Where Is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It Is in French Listeners' Minds

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 618-639

  Hallé, Pierre A ^a   Chéreau, Céline ^a   Segui, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Orthography; morphophonology; phonetics; phoneme monitoring; gating

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006046768     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2718     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Blumstein S. E., Stevens K. N. Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 67:1980;648-662.
2. Dijkstra T., Fieuws S., Roelofs A. Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49:1995;264-271.
3. Dijkstra T., Frauenfelder U., Schreuder R. Bidirectional grapheme-phoneme activation in a bimodal detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;931-950.
4. Donnenwerth-Nolan S., Tanenhaus M. K., Seidenberg M. S. Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 7:1981;170-180.
5. Dupoux E. Prelexical processing: The syllabic hypothesis revisited. Altman G., Shillcock R. Cognitive models of speech processing. 1993;81-114 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
6. Dupoux E., Mehler J. Unifying awareness and on-line studies of speech: A tentative framework. Alegria J., Holender D., Junça de Morais J., Radeau M. Analytic approaches to human cognition. 1992;59-75 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
7. Ehri L., Wilce L. The influence of orthography on reader's conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psychology. 1:1980;371-385.
8. Fox R. A. Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 10:1984;526-540.
9. Frost R., Repp B. H., Katz L. Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print? Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;741-755.
10. Frost R., Katz L. Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word processing. Memory & Cognition. 17:1989;302-311.
11. Grammont M. Traité de Phonétique. 1933;Delagrave, Paris.
12. Greber C., Frauenfelder U. On the locus of morphological effects in spoken-word recognition: before or after lexical identification? Brain and Language. 68:1999;46-53.
13. Grosjean F. Spoken word recognition and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics. 28:1980;267-283.
14. Hallé P. A., Segui J., Frauenfelder U., Meunier C. The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;592-608.
15. Imbs P. Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français. Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. 1971;Librairie Marcel Didier, Paris.
16. Jakimik J., Cole R. A., Rudnicky A. I. Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 24:1985;165-178.
17. Landerl K., Frith U., Wimmer H. Intrusion of orthographic knowledge on phoneme awareness: strong in normal readers, weak in dyslexic readers. Applied Psychology. 17:1996;1-14.
18. Laudanna A., Burani C., Cermele A. Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;295-316.
19. Marslen-Wilson W. D. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;71-102.
20. Marslen-Wilson W. D. Abstractness and combination: The morphemic lexicon. Garrod S., Pickering M. Language processing. 1999;101-119 Psychology Press, Hove.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W. D, Ford, M, Older, L, &, Zhou, X-L. 1995, July, The morphemic lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. Paper presented to the Experimental Psychological Society. Birmingham, UK.
22. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Ford M., Older L., Zhou X-L. The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. Cottrell G. W. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1996;223-227 Erlbaum, Mahwah.
23. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Warren P. Levels of perceptual representations and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review. 101:1994;653-675.
24. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology. 10:1978;29-63.
25. Marslen-Wilson, W. D, &, Zhou, X-L. 1996, January, Modality specificity in lexical access?, Paper presented to the Experimental Psychological Society. London, UK.
26. McClelland J. L., Elman J. L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
27. Norris, D, McQueen, J. M, &, Cutler, A. in press, Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23.
28. Olson D. R. Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition. 60:1996;83-104.
29. O'Shaugnessy D. A study of French vowel and consonant durations. Journal of Phonetics. 9:1981;385-406.
30. Peterson G. I., Lehiste I. Duration of syllabic nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 32:1960;693-703.
31. Port R., Rotunno R. Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 66:1979;654-662.
32. Raphael L. J. Preceding vowel duration as a cue to voicing characteristics of word-final consonants in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 51:1972;1296-1303.
33. Rigault A. L'assimilation consonantique de sonorité en français: Étude acoustique et perceptuelle [Voicing assimilation in French consonants: An acoustic and perceptual study]. Hála B., Romportel M., Janota P. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague. 1967;763-766 Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovat Academy of Sciences, Prague.
34. Samuel A. G. The effect of lexical uniqueness in phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language. 26:1987;36-56.
35. Samuel A. G. Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 125:1996;28-51.
36. Schreuder R., Baayen R. H. Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;357-375.
37. Schriefers H., Zwitserlood P., Roelofs A. The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;26-47.
38. Seidenberg M. S., Tanenhaus M. K. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 5:1979;546-554.
39. Streeter L. A., Nigro G. N. The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 65:1979;1533-1541.
40. Taft M. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20:1981;289-297.
41. Taft M., Hambly G. The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language. 24:1985;320-335.
42. Taft M., Forster K. I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647.
43. Tanenhaus M. K., Flanigan H. P., Seidenberg M. S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition. 8:1980;513-520.
44. Treiman R. Spelling of stop consonants after /s/ by children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics. 6:1985;261-282.
45. Treiman R., Tincoff R., Richmond-Welty E. D. Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology. 32:1996;505-514.
46. Treiman R., Cassar M. Can children and adults focus on sounds as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology. 33:1997;771-780.
47. Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D., Rentoul J., Hanney P. Continuous and discontinuous access in spoken word-recognition: The role of derivational prefixes. Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;368-381.
48. Umeda N. Vowel duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 58:1975;434-455.
49. Umeda N. Consonant duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 61:1977;846-858.
50. Van Petten C., Coulson S., Rubin S., Plante E., Parks M. Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;394-417.
51. Wajskop M. Segmental durations of French intervocalic polsives. Lindblom B., Ohman S. Frontiers of speech communication research. 1979;109-123 Academic Press, New York.
52. Walley A. C., Michela V. L., Wood D. R. The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics. 57:1995;343-351.
53. Warren P., Marslen-Wilson W. Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics. 41:1987;262-275.
54. Warren P., Marslen-Wilson W. Cues to lexical choice: Discriminating place and voice. Perception & Psychophysics. 43:1988;21-30.
55. Warren R. M. Identification times to phonemic components of graded complexity and for spelling of speech. Perception & Psychophysics. 9:1971;345-349.
56. Whalen D. H. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception & Psychophysics. 35:1984;49-64.
57. Whalen D. H. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception & Psychophysics. 50:1991;351-360.
58. Wurm L. H. Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;438-461.
59. Zecker S. G. The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia. 41:1991;178-192.
60. Ziegler J. C., Ferrand L. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 5:1998;683-689.
61. Ziegler J. C., Montant M., Jacobs A. M. The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;533-554.