An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 233-262

  Slowiaczek, Louisa M ^a   Soltano, Emily G ^b   Wieting, Shani J ^c   Bishop, Karyn L ^a  

^a BOWDOIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

AUTOMATISM; HUMANS; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0345060433     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000323     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
2. Bosman, A.M.T., & de Groot, A.M.B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 715-744.
3. Burton, M.W., Jongman, K., & Sereno, J.A. (1993, November). Phonological and orthographic priming effects in auditory and visual word recognition. Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
4. Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226-234.
5. Connine, C.M., Blasko, D.G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
6. Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
7. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.
8. Forster, K.L., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1-25.
9. Frauenfelder, U.H., & Lahiri, A. (1989). Understanding words and word recognition: Does phonology help? In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 319-341). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
11. Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17, 302-310.
12. Goldinger, S.D., Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.R., & Marcario, J.K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
13. Hamburger, M.R.,& Slowiaczek, L.M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 520-525.
14. Hamburger, M.B., & Slowiaczek, L.M. (1999). On the role of bias in dissociated phonological priming effects: A reply to Goldinger (1999). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 352-355.
15. Hillinger, M.L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered, Memory & Cognition, 8, 115-123.
16. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
17. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., Quinlan, P.T., & Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Coltheart (Ed.) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 105-125). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
18. Jaccard, J., & Ackerman, L. (1985). Repeated measures analysis of means in clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 426-428.
19. Jakimik, J., Cole, R.A., & Rudnicky, A.I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 165-178.
20. Kučera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
21. Lupker, S.J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form priming: Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 437-451.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
25. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: On the importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576-585.
26. Martin, R.C., & Jensen, C.R. (1988). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: A failure to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 16, 505-521.
27. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-86.
28. Meyer, D.H., Schvaneveldt, R.W., & Ruddy, M.G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309-321.
29. Norris, D.G. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
30. Norris, D.G., McQueen, J.A., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
31. Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition. Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 299-370.
32. Peter, M., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1990). Phonological priming: Failure to replicate in the rapid naming task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 389-392.
33. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Dewier, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 525-535.
34. Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
35. Seidenberg, M.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
36. Slowiaczek, L.M., & Hamburger, M.B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.
37. Slowiaczek, L.M., & Hamburger, M.B. (1993, November). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition is not strategic. Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
38. Slowiaczek, L.M., McQueen, J.L., Soltano, E.G., & Lynch, M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 530-560.
39. Slowiaczek, L.M., & Pisoni, D.B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14, 230-237.
40. Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
41. Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320-330.
42. Tanenhaus, M.K., Flanigan, H.P., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 8, 513-520.
43. Van Orden, G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
44. Van Orden, G.C., Johnston, J.C., & Hale, B.L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
45. Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
46. Ziegler, J.C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
47. Ziegler, J.C., & Jacobs, A.M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567-593.