Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: The consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 363-368

  Peereman, Ronald ^a,b   Dufour, Sophie ^c   Burt, Jennifer S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 66849091661     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.363     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1234-1249.
2. Bordag, D., Opitz, A., & Pechmann, T. (2006). Gender processing in first and second languages: The role of noun termination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 1090-1101.
3. Chéreau, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2007). Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition, 102, 341-360.
4. Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Lai, C. Y., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: Effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81, 227-241.
5. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
7. Dufour, S., Peereman, R., Pallier, C., & Radeau, M. (2002). Vocolex: Une base de données lexicales sur les similarités phonologiques entre les mots français. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 725-746.
8. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
9. Hallé, P. A., Chéreau, C., & Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 618-639.
10. Holmes, V. M., & Dejean de la Bâtie, B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 479-506.
11. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2007). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 159-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Liberman, A. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 167-178). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
13. Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., Jr., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615-625.
14. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
15. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading abilities. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331.
17. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516-524.
18. Onnis, L., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Lexical categories at the edge of the word. Cognitive Science, 32, 184-221.
19. Pattamadilok, C., Morais, J., Ventura, P., & Kolinsky, R. (2007). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language & Cognitive Processes, 22, 700-726.
20. Peereman, R., Benbousselham, I., Dufour, S., & Bonin, P. (2007, November). Does orthography matter in auditory word recognition? Converging evidence from different tasks. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.
21. Peereman, R., Bonin, P., & Dufour, S. (2008). Orthography in spoken-word recognition: The consistency effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 376-379.
23. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 151-174.
24. Perre, L., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Research, 1188, 132-138.
25. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Word length and lexical activation: Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1120-1135.
26. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 546-554.
27. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and systems principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
28. Taft, M., Castles, A., Davis, C., Lazendic, G., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2008). Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 366-379.
29. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
30. Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 57-95.
31. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
32. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition, 32, 732-741.
33. Ziegler, J. C., Petrova, A., & Ferrand, L. (2008). Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 643-661.