Orthographic congruency effects in the suprasegmental domain: Evidence from Thai

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1515-1537

  Pattamadilok, Chotiga ^a   Kolinsky, Regine ^b   Luksaneeyanawin, Sudaporn ^c   Morais, Jose ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b FNRS   (Belgium)

^c CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Metaphonology; Orthographic congruency effect; Suprasegmental element; Thai lexical tone

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WRITING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 51349108345     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701587305     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176-181.
2. Brown, S. S., & Canseco, G. E. (2004). Who do you love, your mother or your horse? An event-related brain potential analysis of tone processing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 103-135.
3. Campbell, S., & Shaweevongs, C. (1957). The fundamentals of the Thai language. Bangkok, Thailand.
4. Castles, A., Holmes, V. M., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 445-467.
5. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
6. Conrad, R. (1972). Speech and reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 205-240). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cutler, A., & Chen, H. C. (1995). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese word recognition. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, 1, 106-109.
8. Cutler, A., & Chen, H. C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 165-179.
9. Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
10. Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981). Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 170-180.
11. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177.
12. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 26-40.
13. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
14. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.
15. Fox, R. A., & Unkefer, J. (1985). The effect of lexical status on the perception of tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 69-90.
16. Gandour, J., Wong, D., Hsieh, L., Weinzapfel, B., Van Lancker, D., & Hutchins, G. (2000). A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 207-222.
17. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345-365.
18. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 496-528). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2000). CRSLP Thai word frequency. Unpublished research monograph, Centre for Research in Speech and Language Processing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
20. McPherson, W. B., Ackerman, P. T., & Dykman, R. A. (1997). Auditory and visual rhyme judgements reveal differences and similarities between normal and disabled adolescent readers. Dyslexia, 3, 63-77.
21. Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (1995). The consequences of phonemic awareness. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: Comparative approaches (pp. 317-337). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Pattamadilok, C., Kolinsky, R., Ventura, P., Radeau, M., & Morais, J. (in press). Orthographic representations in spoken word priming: No early automatic activation. Language and Speech.
23. Pattamadilok, C., Morais, J., Ventura, P., & Kolinsky, R. (2007). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 700-726.
24. Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.
25. Rack, J. P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 325-340.
26. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6, 26-30.
27. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
28. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
29. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
30. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
31. Sirikanjanapong, K. (1996). Orthographical system in the Thai primer of the department of curriculum and instruction development [in Thai]. Unpublished master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
32. Taft, M., & Chen, H. C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: The influence of tones. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 151-172). Amsterdam. Elsevier.
33. Thonglor, K. (1994). Làk Pha Sǎ Thai [Rules of Thai language] (S. Luksaneeyanawin, Trans.). Bangkok, Thailand: Rouam Sarn.
34. Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology, 33, 771-780.
35. Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1996). Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 505-514.
36. Tsang, K. K., & Hoosain, R. (1979). Segmental phonemes and tonal phonemes in comprehension of Cantonese. Psychologia, 22, 222-224.
37. Ventura, P., Kolinsky, R., Brito-Mendes, C., & Morais, J. (2001). Mental representations of the syllable internal structure are influenced by orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 393-418.
38. Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 57-95.
39. Ye, Y., & Connine, C. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609-630.
40. Zecker, S. G. (1991). The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 178-192.
41. Zecker, S. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Alderman, L., & Siqueland, L. (1986). Lateralization of lexical codes in auditory word recognition. Brain and Language, 29, 372-389.
42. Zhou, X., Yanxuan, Q. Hua, S., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004) Constraints of lexical tone on semantic activation in Chinese spoken word recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36, 379-392.
43. Ziegler, J. C, Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effect of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory and Cognition, 32, 732-741.