Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 732-741

  Ziegler, Johannes C ^a   Ferrand, Ludovic ^a   Montant, Marie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ERROR; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PHONETICS; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION; WRITING;

EID: 6344285248     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195863     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ABRAMSON, M., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1997). What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1059-1068.
2. BRAITENBERG, V. (1989). Some arguments for a theory of cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover, & R. M. Harnish (Eds.), Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 137-145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
4. CONTENT, A., MOUSTY, P., & RADEAU, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. [BRULEX: A computerized lexical data base for the French language]. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
5. DAMIAN, M. F., & BOWERS, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 119-132.
6. DIJKSTRA, T., ROELOFS, A., & FIEUWS, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
7. EHRI, L. C., & WILCE, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371-385.
8. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
9. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., SEGUI, J., & DIJKSTRA, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 77-91.
10. FROST, R., & KATZ, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17, 302-310.
11. FROST, R., REPP, B. H., & KATZ, L. (1988). Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print? Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 741-755.
12. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1996). Auditory lexical decision. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 559-567.
13. GOSWAMI, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217-240.
14. GOSWAMI, U. (2002a). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 47-57.
15. GOSWAMI, U. (2002b). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141-163.
16. HALLE, P. A., CHEREAU, C., & SEGUI, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 618-639.
17. HEBB, D. O. (1988). The first stage of perception: Growth of the assembly. In J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Neurocomputing: Foundations of research (pp. 45-56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. JAKIMIK, J. A., COLE, R. A., & RUDNICKY, A. I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 24, 165-178.
19. JARED, D., McRAE, K., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 687-715.
20. KESSLER, B.,TREIMAN, R., & MULLENNIX, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 145-171.
21. KIRTLEY, C., BRYANT, P., MACLEAN, M., & BRADLEY, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224-245.
22. LIBERMAN, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 167-178): Oxford: Elsevier, North-Holland.
23. LIU, H., BATES, E., POWELL, T., & WULFECK, B. (1997). Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 157-180.
24. LUCE, P. A., GOLDINGER, S. D., & VITEVITCH, M. S. (2000). It's good . . . but is it ART? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 336.
25. McRAE, K., JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 43-65.
26. METSALA, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 47-56.
27. METSALA, J. L., & WALLEY, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. MORAIS, J., CARY, L., ALEGRIA, J., & BERTELSON, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331.
29. NEW, B., PALLIER, C., FERRAND, L., & MATOS, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur l'internet: LEXIQUE. [A lexical database of contemporary French on the Internet: LEXIQUE]. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
30. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-325.
31. OLSON, D. R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60, 83-104.
32. PEEREMAN, R., CONTENT, A., & BONIN, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 151-174.
33. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SCHRIJNEMAKERS, J. M. C., & GREMMEN, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416-426.
34. RADEAU, M., & MORAIS, J. (1990). The uniqueness point effect in the shadowing of spoken words. Speech Communication, 9, 155-164.
35. RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 307-314.
36. RUECKL, J. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14, 5-19.
37. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 546-554.
38. SEIDENBERG, M. S., WATERS, G. S., BARNES, M. A., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
39. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., SOLTANO, E. G., WIETING, S. J., & BISHOP, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 233-262.
40. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
41. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
42. TAFT, M., & HAMBLY, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 320-335.
43. TANENHAUS, M. K., FLANIGAN, H. P., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 8, 513-520.
44. TARABAN, R., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 608-631.
45. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (2002). Nonlinear dynamics and psycholinguistics. Ecological Psychology, 14, 1-4.
46. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
47. VENTURA, P., KOLINSKY, R., BRITO-MENDES, C., & MORAIS, J. (2001). Mental representations of the syllable internal structure are influenced by orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 393-418.
48. VENTURA, P., MORAIS, J., PATTAMADILOK, C., & KOLINSKY, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 57-95.
49. VITEVITCH, M. S. (2002). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 270-278.
50. VITEVITCH, M. S., & LUCE, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
51. VITEVITCH, M. S., & LUCE, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374-408.
52. ZIEGLER, J. C., & FERRAND, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.
53. ZIEGLER, J. C., JACOBS, A. M., & STONE, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.
54. ZIEGLER, J. C., MUNEAUX, M., & GRAINGER, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 779-793.