Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 463-480

  Connine, Cynthia M ^a   Titone, Debra ^a   Deelman, Thomas ^a   Blasko, Dawn ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031281741     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2535     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andruski J. E., Blumstein S. E., Burton S. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition. 52:1994;163-187.
2. Balota D. The role of meaning in word recognition. Comprehension processes in reading. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
3. Burton M., Blumstein S. Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization: The role of stimulus naturalness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 21:1995;1230-1235.
4. Cluff M. S., Luce P. A. Similarity neighborhoods in spoken two-syllable words: Retroactive effects on multiple activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;551-563.
5. Connine C. M. Vertical and horizontal similarity in spoken word recognition. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
6. Connine C. M., Blasko D. G., Hall M. Effects of Subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;234-250.
7. Connine C. M., Blasko D. M., Titone D. A. Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993;193-210.
8. Connine C. M., Blasko D. M., Wang J. Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Perceptual ambiguity, sentence context and individual differences. Perception & Psychophysics. 56:1994;624-636.
9. Connine C. M., Clifton C. Jr. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2:1987;291-299.
10. Connine C. M., Deelman T. Phonological Variation and Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition. 1994.
11. Connine C. M., Titone D. Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes. 11:1996;635-645.
12. Cutler A., Norris D. Monitoring sentence comprehension. Cooper W. E., Walker E. T. C. Language processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. 1979;113-134 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., Segui J. The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language. 25:1987;385-400.
14. Deelman T., Connine C. M. Mismatch, Redundancy and Missing Information in Spoken Word Recognition. 1996.
15. Elman J., McClelland J. Exploiting the lawful variability in the speech wave. Perkell J. S., Klatt D. H. Invariance and variability of speech processes. 1986;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
16. Fodor J. The modularity of mind. 1983;MIT Press, Cambridge.
17. Foss D. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 8:1969;457-462.
18. Foss D., Swinney D. On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 12:1973;246-257.
19. Frauenfelder U., Peeters G. Lexical segmentation in TRACE: An exercise in simulations. Altmann G. T. M. Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
20. Frauenfelder U., Segui J. Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;134-140.
21. Gaskell M. G., Marslen-Wilson W. D. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;144-158.
22. Gernsbacher M. A., Faust M. The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition. 17:1991;245-262.
23. Grosjean F. The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception & Psychophysics. 38:1985;299-310.
24. Gow D., Gordon P. C. Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;344-359.
25. Holender D. Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 9:1986;1-66.
26. Kolers P. A., Roediger H. L. Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory. 23:1984;425-449.
27. Marslen-Wilson W. Issues of process and representation in spoken language understanding. Altmann G., Shillcock R. Cognitive models of speech processing. 1993;Erlbaum, East Sussex.
28. Marslen-Wilson W., Moss H., van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 22:1996;1376-1392.
29. Marslen-Wilson W., Zwitserlood P. Accessing spoken words: On the importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1988;576-585.
30. McClelland J. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review. 86:1979;287-330.
31. McClelland J., Elman J. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
32. McClelland J., Rumelhart D. E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 88:1981;375-407.
33. McQueen J. M. The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality and word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;433-443.
34. Miller J. L., Eimas P. Speech perception: From signal to word. Annual Review of Psychology. 46:1995;467-492.
35. Miller J. L., Volaitis L. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics. 46:1989;505-512.
36. Miyake A., Carpenter P. A., Just M. A. Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;175-202.
37. Morton J., Long. Effect of word transitional probability on phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 15:1976;43-51.
38. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition. 52:1994;189-234.
39. Olive J. P., Greenwood A., Coleman J. Acoustics of american english speech: A dynamic approach. 1993;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
40. Pitt M., Samuel A. Autonomous vs interactive models in speech perception: Evidence from an identification study and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;699-725.
41. Wilson M. D. MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers. 20:1988;6-10.