Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 403-411

  Connine, Cynthia M ^a   Ranbom, Larissa J ^a   Patterson, David J ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 45549109123     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.3.403     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BALOTA, D. A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycho-linguistics (pp. 303-358). San Diego: Academic Press.
2. BINDER, K. S., & RAYNER, K. (1998). Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 271-276.
3. CHURCH, B. A., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 521-533.
4. CONNINE, C. M. (2004). It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1084-1089.
5. CONNINE, C. M., & CLIFTON, C., JR. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 291-299.
6. CUTLER, A., MEHLER, J., NORRIS, D., & SEGUI, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
7. DEELMAN, T., & CONNINE, C. M. (2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Non-released stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 656-663.
8. DILLEY, L., & PITT, M. (2007). A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2340-2353.
9. ERNESTUS, M., BAAYEN, H., & SCHREUDER, R. (2002). The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain & Language, 81, 162-173.
10. FOWLER, C., & HOUSUM, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 489-504.
11. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 110-125.
13. GODFREY, J. D., HOLLIMAN, E. C., & MCDANIEL, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In 1992 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 517-520). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
14. GOLDINGER, S. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
15. GOW, D. W., JR. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 575-590.
16. GOW, D.W., JR., & IM, A. M. (2004). A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 279-296.
17. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
18. KEMPS, R., ERNESTUS, M., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, H. R. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain & Language, 90, 117-127.
19. KISILEVSKY, B. S., HAINS, S. M. J., LEE, K., XIE, X., HUANG, H., YE, H. H., ET AL. (2003). Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science, 14, 220-224.
20. LIVELY, S. E., PISONI, D. B., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition: Research and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-302). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. LOCASTO, P. C., & CONNINE, C. M. (2002). Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 208-219.
22. LORCH, R. F., & MYERS, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
23. MANUEL, S. (1992). Recovery of "deleted" schwa. In O. Engstrand & C. Kylander (Eds.), Perilus XIV: Papers from the Symposium on Current Phonetic Research Paradigms for Speech Motor Control (pp. 115-118). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
24. MCQUEEN, J. M. (1997). Phonetic categorisation. In F. Grosjean & U. Frauenfelder (Eds.), A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms (pp. 655-664). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
25. MILLER, J. L. (2001). Mapping from acoustic signal to phonetic category: Internal structure, context effects and speeded categorization. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 683-690.
26. MITTERER, H., & BLOMERT, L. (2003). Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 956-969.
27. MITTERER, H., CSEPE, V., HONBOLYGO, F., & BLOMERT, I. (2006). The recognition of assimilated word forms does not depend on specific language experience. Cognitive Science, 30, 451-479.
28. MITTERER, H., & ERNESTUS, M. (2006). Listeners report /t/s that speakers lenit: Evidence from /t/ lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 73-103.
29. MULLENNIX, J. W. (1997). On the nature of perceptual adjustments to voice. In K. A. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability and speech processing (pp. 67-83). San Diego: Academic Press.
30. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
31. NYGAARD, L. C., BURT, S. A., & QUEEN, J. S. (2000). Surface form typicality and asymmetric transfer in episodic memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1228-1244.
32. NYGAARD, L. C., & LUNDERS, E. R. (2002). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory & Cognition, 30, 583-593.
33. NYGAARD, L. C., & PISONI, D. B. (1995). Speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 63-90). San Diego: Academic Press.
34. OSHIKA, B., ZUE, V. W., WEEKS, R. V., NEU, H., & AURBACH, J. (1975). The role of phonological rules in speech understanding research. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing, ASSP-23, 104-112.
35. PATTERSON, D., & CONNINE, C. M. (2001). A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica, 58, 254-275.
36. PATTERSON, D., LOCASTO, P. C., & CONNINE, C. M. (2003). A corpus analysis of schwa vowel deletion frequency in American English. Phonetica, 60, 45-68.
37. PITT, M. A. (1998). Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 941-951.
38. PITT, M. A., JOHNSON, K., HUME, E., KIESLING, S., & RAYMOND, W. (2005). The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: Labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability. Speech Communication, 45, 89-95.
39. PITT, M. A., & SAMUEL, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1-27.
40. POLLACK, I., & PICKETT, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language & Speech, 6, 165-171.
41. RANBOM, L. R., & CONNINE, C. M. (2007a). Lexical representation of phonological variation. Journal of Memory & Language, 57, 273-298.
42. RANBOM, L. R., & CONNINE, C. M. (2007b, November). The role of orthography in spoken word recognition. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.
43. SAMUEL, A. G. (1981). Phoneme restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
44. STEVENS, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. SUMNER, M., & SAMUEL, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 322-338.
46. VAN DONSELAAR, W., KUIJPERS, C., & CUTLER, A. (1999). Facilitatory effects of vowel epenthesis on word processing in Dutch. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 59-77.
47. ZWICKY, A. (1972). Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory (pp. 275-301). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.