Technology uptake in Chinese EFL classes

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 99-125

  Li, Li ^a   Walsh, Steve ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

beliefs; China; English language teaching; ICT integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650505192     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168810383347     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Atkins, N.E. & Vasu, E.S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 279-302.
2. Baylor, A.L. & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39, 395-414.
3. Becker, H.J. & Riel, M.M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organisations, University of California, Irvine. Retrieved from: http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_7/startpage.html (October 2010).
4. Beijing Academy Educational Science (2001). A survey of ICT integration into teaching in primary and secondary schools in Beijing. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.cn/20030221/3077877.shtml (October 2010).
5. Bitner, N. & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 95-100.
6. Cabanatan, P. (2003). Integrating pedagogy and technology: The SEAMEO INNOTECH Experience. Presentation to experts meeting on teachers/facilitators training in technology-pedagogy integration, Bangkok, Thailand, 18-20 June.
7. Carman, L. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality and interdisciplinarity. Research Quarterly, 38, 397-403.
8. Chapelle, C.A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K.R.B. (2000). Research methods in education. 5th edition. London: Routledge.
10. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813-34.
11. Debski, R. (2000). Investigating the re-creation of a CALL innovation in a tertiary setting. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 307-32.
12. Doherty, K.M. & Orlofsky, G.F. (2001). Student survey says: Schools are probably not using educational technology as wisely or effectively as they could. Educational Week, 20, 45-8.
13. Dowd, R.O. (2003). Understanding the 'other side': Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 118-44.
14. Egbert, J., Paulus, T.M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning and Technology, 6, 108-26.
15. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47-61.
16. Ertmer, P., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 54-72.
17. Fabry, D.L. & Higgs, J.R. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: current status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 174, 385-95.
18. Hruskocy, C., Cennamo, K.S., Ertmer, P.A., & Johnson, T. (2000). Creating a community of technology users: students become technology experts for teachers and peers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 69-84.
19. Huang, R. (2001). Tomorrow's hope: The status quo and development of Chinese educational informatization. Computer Journal, 62, 16-7.
20. Jonassen, D., Wang, F.-K., Strobel, J., & Cernusca, D. (2003). Applications of a case library of technology integration stories for teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 547-66.
21. Jones, J.F. (2001). CALL and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators. ELT Journal, 55, 360-67.
22. Kozma, R. & Anderson, R.E. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 387-94.
23. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 389-420.
24. Levy, M. (1997). A rationale for teacher education and CALL: The holistic view and its implications. Computers and the Humanities, 30, 293-302.
25. Li, L. (2008). EFL teachers' beliefs about ICT integration in Chinese secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.
26. Loveless, A., Devoogd, G.L., & Bohlin, R.M. (2001). Something old, something new... Is pedagogy affected by ICT? In A. Loveless & V. Ellis (Eds.), ICT, pedagogy and the curriculum: Subject to change (pp. 63-83). London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
27. Meskill, C. (2006). CALL: A survey of K-12 ESOL teacher uses and preferences. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 439-51.
28. Meskill, C. & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian class. System, 33, 89-105.
29. Meskill, C. & Mossop, J. (2000). Technologies use with learners of English as second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 265-84.
30. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 93, 319-41.
31. Nikolova, O.R. (2002). Effect of students' participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning and Technology, 6, 100-22.
32. Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163-78.
33. Snoeyink, R. & Ertmer, P. (2001). Thrust into technology: How western teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 85-111.
34. Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new Millennium. Language Learning and Technology, 6, 165-80.
35. Thorne, S.L. & Payne, J.S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22, 371-97.
36. Ushida, E. & Thomson, C.K. (2003). The world wide web as a teaching and learning resource: Observation of learners' performance in the resource based learning of Japanese as a foreign language. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 74-90.
37. Wang, Q. (2003). Developing learners' autonomous learning ability in teaching English on-line. Journal of Shanxi Radio and TV University, 8, 81-82.
38. Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
39. Yuen, A. & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 365-82.
40. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent development in technology and language: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21, 7-27.
41. Zhong, Y.X. & Shen, H.Z. (2002). Where is the technology-induced pedagogy? Snapshots from two multimedia EFL classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 39-52.