Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 165-180

  Stepp Greany, Jonita ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042601834     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beauvois, M. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), 177-190.
2. Beauvois, M. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2-3), 27-45.
3. Beauvois, M. (1998) Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198-217.
4. Becker, H. J. (1994). How our best computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291-321.
5. Blackstock Junior High School: Multimedia technology drives smart school (1993). Technology and Learning, 14(1), 41-44.
6. Blyth, C. (1997). A constructivist approach to grammar: Teaching teachers to teach aspect. The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 50-66.
7. Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8. Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1996). Voices from networked classrooms. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 34-37.
9. Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language/culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 527-533.
10. Conrad, D. (1999). The student view on effective practices in the college elementary and intermediate foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 494-512.
11. Coverdale-Jones, T. (2000). The use of video-conferencing as a communication tool for language learning: Issues and considerations. IALL Journal, 32(1), 27-40.
12. Crawford, J. (1993). The effects of whole language instruction on community college learners. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 136A.
13. Dwyer, D. (1996). A response to Douglas Noble: We're in this together. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 24-27.
14. Fountas, I., & Hannigan, I. (1989). Making sense of whole language. Childhood Education, 65, 133-137.
15. Glisan, G., Dudt, K., & Howe, M. (1998). Teaching Spanish through distance education: Implications of a pilot study. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 48-66.
16. Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zabrow, D. (1995). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. In Z. Berge & M. Collins (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom (pp. 47-78). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
17. Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using E-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai'i symposium (pp. 105-109). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
18. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development: ETR&D, 41(3), 104-116.
19. Lee, P. K. (1993). A case study: students' perceptions of caring manners of educational le aders and its relation to their learning outcomes. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 377A
20. Lunde, K (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. CALICO Journal, 7(3), 68-78.
21. Markham, P. (1999). Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 321-328.
22. Mather, M. (1997). Mentoring, digital style. Technology and Learning, 18(4), 16-21.
23. McGrath, B. (1998). Partners in learning: twelve ways technology changes the teacher-student relationship. Technological Horizon In Education, 25(9), 58-62.
24. Nowaczyk, R. (1998). Student perception of multimedia in the undergraduate classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25, 367-368.
25. Paul, R. (1990). Open learning and open management. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
26. Salaberry, M. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: a retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 41-56.
27. Sanaoui, R., & Lapkin, S. (1992). A case study of an FSL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 43(3), 524-552.
28. Schrum, J., & Glisan, E. (2000). Teacher's Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
29. Warschauer, M. (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai'i symposium (Technical Report # 12; pp. 29-46). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
30. Weaver, C. (1990). Understanding whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
31. Weiss, J. (1994). Keeping up with the research. Technology and Learning, 14(5), 30-34.
32. Young, J. (1986). The effects of three different sequences of instruction on student performance and attitudes in a teacher education course (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 244.