Combining modularity, conservation, and interactions of proteins significantly increases precision and coverage of protein function prediction

BMC Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Jaeger, Samira ^a   Sers, Christine T ^b   Leser, Ulf ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPHRIN RECEPTOR B4; MISMATCH REPAIR PROTEIN PMS2; PROTEIN MLH1; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES COMPARISON; TUMOR GENE; ANIMAL; BASE MISPAIRING; BIOLOGY; DNA REPAIR; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN BINDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIR MISMATCH; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA REPAIR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78650294065     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-717     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Eisenberg D, Marcotte EM, Xenarios I, Yeates TO. Protein function in the post-genomic era. Nature 2000, 405(6788):823-826. 10.1038/35015694, 10866208., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35015694
2. Frishman D. Protein annotation at genomic scale: the current status. Chem Rev 2007, 107(8):3448-3466. 10.1021/cr068303k, 17658902., http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr068303k
3. Sharan R, Ulitsky I, Shamir R. Network-based prediction of protein function. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:88. 10.1038/msb4100129, 1847944, 17353930., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb4100129
4. Reference Genome Group of the Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology's Reference Genome Project: a unified framework for functional annotation across species. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5(7):e1000431. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000431, 2699109, 19578431, Reference Genome Group of the Gene Ontology Consortium., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000431
5. Baxter SM, Fetrow JS. Sequence- and structure-based protein function prediction from genomic information. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2001, 4(3):291-295.
6. Pal D, Eisenberg D. Inference of protein function from protein structure. Structure 2005, 13:121-130. 10.1016/j.str.2004.10.015, 15642267., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2004.10.015
7. Lee D, Redfern O, Orengo C. Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8(12):995-1005. 10.1038/nrm2281, 18037900., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2281
8. Hawkins T, Chitale M, Luban S, Kihara D. PFP: Automated prediction of gene ontology functional annotations with confidence scores using protein sequence data. Proteins 2009, 74(3):566-582. 10.1002/prot.22172, 18655063., http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22172
9. Chitale M, Hawkins T, Park C, Kihara D. ESG: extended similarity group method for automated protein function prediction. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(14):1739-1745. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp309, 2705228, 19435743., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp309
10. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(17):3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389, 146917, 9254694.
11. Loewenstein Y, Raimondo D, Redfern OC, Watson J, Frishman D, Linial M, Orengo C, Thornton J, Tramontano A. Protein function annotation by homology-based inference. Genome Biol 2009, 10(2):207. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207, 2688287, 19226439., http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207
12. Engelhardt BE, Jordan MI, Muratore KE, Brenner SE. Protein molecular function prediction by Bayesian phylogenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1(5):e45. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010045, 1246806, 16217548., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010045
13. Ranea JAG, Yeats C, Grant A, Orengo CA. Predicting protein function with hierarchical phylogenetic profiles: the Gene3D Phylo-Tuner method applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3(11):e237. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030237, 2098864, 18052542., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030237
14. Forslund K, Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting protein function from domain content. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(15):1681-1687. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn312, 18591194., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn312
15. Llewellyn R, Eisenberg DS. Annotating proteins with generalized functional linkages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(46):17700-17705. 10.1073/pnas.0809583105, 2584710, 19004787., http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809583105
16. Hishigaki H, Nakai K, Ono T, Tanigami A, Takagi T. Assessment of prediction accuracy of protein function from protein-protein interaction data. Yeast 2001, 18(6):523-531. 10.1002/yea.706, 11284008., http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.706
17. Chen XW, Liu M, Ward R. Protein function assignment through mining cross-species protein-protein interactions. PLoS One 2008, 3(2):e1562. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001562, 2216687, 18253506., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001562
18. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, Chaudhuri A, Kuang B, Li Y, Hao YL, Ooi CE, Godwin B, Vitols E, Vijayadamodar G, Pochart P, Machineni H, Welsh M, Kong Y, Zerhusen B, Malcolm R, Varrone Z, Collis A, Minto M, Burgess S, McDaniel L, Stimpson E, Spriggs F, Williams J, Neurath K, Ioime N, Agee M, Voss E, Furtak K, Renzulli R, . other A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2003, 302(5651):1727-1736. 10.1126/science.1090289, 14605208, other., http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090289
19. Schwikowski B, Uetz P, Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18(12):1257-1261. 10.1038/82360, 11101803., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/82360
20. Dittrich MT, Klau GW, Rosenwald A, Dandekar T, Müller T. Identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(13):i223-i231. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn161, 2718639, 18586718., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn161
21. Spirin V, Mirny LA. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(21):12123-12128. 10.1073/pnas.2032324100, 218723, 14517352., http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2032324100
22. Kelley BP, Sharan R, Karp RM, Sittler T, Root DE, Stockwell BR, Ideker T. Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(20):11394-11399. 10.1073/pnas.1534710100, 208768, 14504397., http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1534710100
23. Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley RM, Kuhn T, McCuine S, Uetz P, Sittler T, Karp RM, Ideker T. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(6):1974-1979. 10.1073/pnas.0409522102, 548573, 15687504., http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409522102
24. Jaeger S, Leser U. High-Precision Function Prediction using Conserved Interactions. Proceedings of the German Conference on Bioinformatics, GCB 2007, September 26-28, 2007, Potsdam, Germany, Volume 115 of LNI 2007, 146-162. Falter C, Schliep A, Selbig J, Vingron M, Walther D, GI.
25. Dutkowski J, Tiuryn J. Identification of functional modules from conserved ancestral protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(13):i149-i158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm194, 17646291., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm194
26. Deng M, Zhang K, Mehta S, Chen T, Sun F. Prediction of protein function using protein-protein interaction data. J Comput Biol 2003, 10(6):947-960. 10.1089/106652703322756168, 14980019., http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/106652703322756168
27. Chua HN, Sung WK, Wong L. Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(13):1623-1630. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145, 16632496., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145
28. Huynen MA, Snel B, von Mering C, Bork P. Function prediction and protein networks. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003, 15(2):191-198. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00009-7, 12648675.
29. Vazquez A, Flammini A, Maritan A, Vespignani A. Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21(6):697-700. 10.1038/nbt825, 12740586., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt825
30. Sun S, Zhao Y, Jiao Y, Yin Y, Cai L, Zhang Y, Lu H, Chen R, Bu D. Faster and more accurate global protein function assignment from protein interaction networks using the MFGO algorithm. FEBS Lett 2006, 580(7):1891-1896. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.053, 16516894., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.053
31. Bader GD, Hogue CWV. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:2. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-2, 149346, 12525261.
32. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 1999, 402(6761 Suppl):C47-C52. 10.1038/35011540, 10591225., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35011540
33. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(2):101-113. 10.1038/nrg1272, 14735121., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272
34. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417(6887):399-403. 10.1038/nature750, 12000970., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature750
35. Deng M, Sun F, Chen T. Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003, 140-151.
36. Hart GT, Ramani AK, Marcotte EM. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks?. Genome Biol 2006, 7(11):120. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-120, 1794583, 17147767., http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-120
37. Song J, Singh M. How and when should interactome-derived clusters be used to predict functional modules and protein function?. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(23):3143-3150. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp551, 19770263., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp551
38. Punta M, Ofran Y. The rough guide to in silico function prediction, or how to use sequence and structure information to predict protein function. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(10):e1000160. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000160, 2518264, 18974821., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000160
39. Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J, Ge H, Davis BP, Garrels J, Vincent S, Vidal M. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res 2001, 11(12):2120-2126. 10.1101/gr.205301, 311221, 11731503., http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.205301
40. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000, 25:25-29. 10.1038/75556, 10802651.
41. Salwinski L, Miller CS, Smith AJ, Pettit FK, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, (32 Database):D449-D451. 10.1093/nar/gkh086, 308820, 14681454.
42. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C, Mudali S, Kerrien S, Orchard S, Vingron M, Roechert B, Roepstorff P, Valencia A, Margalit H, Armstrong J, Bairoch A, Cesareni G, Sherman D, Apweiler R. IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, (32 Database):D452-D455. 10.1093/nar/gkh052, 308786, 14681455., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh052
43. Bader GD, Betel D, Hogue CWV. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:248-250. 10.1093/nar/gkg056, 165503, 12519993.
44. Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M, Brauner B, Dunger-Kaltenbach I, Frishman G, Montrone C, Mark P, Stümpflen V, Mewes HW, Ruepp A, Frishman D. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(6):832-834. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti115, 15531608., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti115
45. Peri S, Navarro JD, Amanchy R, Kristiansen TZ, Jonnalagadda CK, Surendranath V, Niranjan V, Muthusamy B, Gandhi TKB, Gronborg M, Ibarrola N, Deshpande N, Shanker K, Shivashankar HN, Rashmi BP, Ramya MA, Zhao Z, Chandrika KN, Padma N, Harsha HC, Yatish AJ, Kavitha MP, Menezes M, Choudhury DR, Suresh S, Ghosh N, Saravana R, Chandran S, Krishna S, Joy M, et al. Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. Genome Res 2003, 13(10):2363-2371. 10.1101/gr.1680803, 403728, 14525934., http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.1680803
46. Chatr-aryamontri A, Ceol A, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Nardelli G, Schneider MV, Castagnoli L, Cesareni G. MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Research 2007, (35 Database):572-574. 10.1093/nar/gkl950, 1802621, 17175531., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl950
47. Stark C, Breitkreutz BK, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, (34 Database):535-539.,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj109
48. Futschik ME, Chaurasia G, Herzel H. Comparison of human protein-protein interaction maps. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(5):605-611. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl683, 17237052., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl683
49. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Edgar R, Federhen S, Feolo M, Geer LY, Helmberg W, Kapustin Y, Khovayko O, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Madden TL, Maglott DR, Miller V, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, Shumway M, Sequeira E, Sherry ST, Sirotkin K, Souvorov A, Starchenko G, Tatusov RL, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, (36 Database):D13-D21. 2238880, 18045790., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1000
50. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R. The InterPro database and tools for protein domain analysis. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2008, Chapter 2:Unit 2.7., http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0207s21
51. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S, Schneider M. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:365-370. 10.1093/nar/gkg095, 165542, 12520024.
52. FlyBase C. The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:172-175. 10.1093/nar/gkg094, 165541, 12519974.
53. Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Blake JA, . Mouse Genome Database Group The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): mouse biology and model systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, (36 Database):D724-D728. 2238849, 18158299, Mouse Genome Database Group.
54. Twigger SN, Shimoyama M, Bromberg S, Kwitek AE, Jacob HJ, . Rat Genome Database Team The Rat Genome Database, update 2007-easing the path from disease to data and back again. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, (35 Database):D658-D662. 10.1093/nar/gkl988, 1761441, 17151068, Rat Genome Database Team.
55. Hong EL, Balakrishnan R, Dong Q, Christie KR, Park J, Binkley G, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Engel SR, Fisk DG, Hirschman JE, Hitz BC, Krieger CJ, Livstone MS, Miyasato SR, Nash RS, Oughtred R, Skrzypek MS, Weng S, Wong ED, Zhu KK, Dolinski K, Botstein D, Cherry JM. Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, (36 Database):D577-D581. 2238894, 17982175., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm909
56. Bieri T, Blasiar D, Ozersky P, Antoshechkin I, Bastiani C, Canaran P, Chan J, Chen N, Chen WJ, Davis P, Fiedler TJ, Girard L, Han M, Harris TW, Kishore R, Lee R, McKay S, Müller HM, Nakamura C, Petcherski A, Rangarajan A, Rogers A, Schindelman G, Schwarz EM, Spooner W, Tuli MA, Auken KV, Wang D, Wang X, Williams G, et al. WormBase: new content and better access. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, (35 Database):D506-D510. 10.1093/nar/gkl818, 1669750, 17099234., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl818
57. Dolinski K, Botstein D. Orthology and functional conservation in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 2007, 41:465-507. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439, 17678444., http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439
58. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003, 13(9):2178-2189. 10.1101/gr.1224503, 403725, 12952885., http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.1224503
59. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Vermunt JK, Roos DS. Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS ONE 2007, 2(4):e383. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000383, 1849888, 17440619., http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000383
60. Koyutürk M, Grama A, Szpankowski W. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(Suppl 1):i200-i207., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth919
61. Couto FM, Silva MJ, Pedro Coutinho PM. Measuring semantic similarity between Gene Ontology terms. Data Knowl Eng 2007, 61:137-152.
62. Chua HN, Sung WK, Wong L. Using indirect protein interactions for the prediction of Gene Ontology functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(Suppl 4):S8. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S4-S8, 1892087, 17570151., http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S4-S8
63. Yamada T, Bork P. Evolution of biomolecular networks: lessons from metabolic and protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(11):791-803. 10.1038/nrm2787, 19851337., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2787
64. Zhou X, Kao MCJ, Wong WH. Transitive functional annotation by shortest-path analysis of gene expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(20):12783-12788. 10.1073/pnas.192159399, 130537, 12196633., http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192159399
65. Tao Y, Sam L, Li J, Friedman C, Lussier YA. Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(13):i529-i538. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm195, 2882681, 17646340., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm195
66. Saeed R, Deane C. An assessment of the uses of homologous interactions. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(5):689-695. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm576, 18042554., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm576
67. Jiricny J. MutLalpha: at the cutting edge of mismatch repair. Cell 2006, 126(2):239-241. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.003, 16873053., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.003
68. Kumar SR, Scehnet JS, Ley EJ, Singh J, Krasnoperov V, Liu R, Manchanda PK, Ladner RD, Hawes D, Weaver FA, Beart RW, Singh G, Nguyen C, Kahn M, Gill PS. Preferential induction of EphB4 over EphB2 and its implication in colorectal cancer progression. Cancer Res 2009, 69(9):3736-3745. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3232, 19366806., http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3232
69. Li GM. Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair. Cell Res 2008, 18:85-98. 10.1038/cr.2007.115, 18157157., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.115
70. Jiricny J. Mediating mismatch repair. Nat Genet 2000, 24:6-8. 10.1038/71698, 10615114., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/71698
71. Habraken Y, Sung P, Prakash L, Prakash S. Enhancement of MSH2-MSH3-mediated mismatch recognition by the yeast MLH1-PMS1 complex. Curr Biol 1997, 7(10):790-793. 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00337-X, 9368761.
72. Yoshioka K, Yoshioka Y, Hsieh P. ATR kinase activation mediated by MutSalpha and MutLalpha in response to cytotoxic O6-methylguanine adducts. Mol Cell 2006, 22(4):501-510. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.023, 2423943, 16713580., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.023
73. Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, Bronner CE, Harris AC, Yao X, Christie DM, Monell C, Arnheim N, Bradley A, Ashley T, Liskay RM. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet 1996, 13(3):336-342. 10.1038/ng0796-336, 8673133., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng0796-336
74. Hall MC, Shcherbakova PV, Kunkel TA. Differential ATP binding and intrinsic ATP hydrolysis by amino-terminal domains of the yeast Mlh1 and Pms1 proteins. J Biol Chem 2002, 277(5):3673-3679. 10.1074/jbc.M106120200, 11717305., http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M106120200
75. Guarne A, Junop MS, Yang W. Structure and function of the N-terminal 40 kDa fragment of human PMS2: a monomeric GHL ATPase. EMBO J 2001, 20(19):5521-5531. 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5521, 125661, 11574484., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.19.5521
76. Hsieh P, Yamane K. DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2008, 129(7-8):391-407. 10.1016/j.mad.2008.02.012, 2574955, 18406444., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2008.02.012
77. Gibson SL, Narayanan L, Hegan DC, Buermeyer AB, Liskay RM, Glazer PM. Overexpression of the DNA mismatch repair factor, PMS2, confers hypermutability and DNA damage tolerance. Cancer Lett 2006, 244(2):195-202. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.12.009, 16426742., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2005.12.009
78. Erdeniz N, Nguyen M, Deschenes SM, Liskay RM. Mutations affecting a putative MutLα endonuclease motif impact multiple mismatch repair functions. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007, 6(10):1463-1470. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.04.013, 2366940, 17567544., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.04.013
79. Stone JE, Petes TD. Analysis of the proteins involved in the in vivo repair of base-base mismatches and four-base loops formed during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006, 173(3):1223-1239. 10.1534/genetics.106.055616, 1526700, 16702432., http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.055616
80. Ikegaki N, Tang XX, Liu XG, Biegel JA, Allen C, Yoshioka A, Sulman EP, Brodeur GM, Pleasure DE. Molecular characterization and chromosomal localization of DRT (EPHT3): a developmentally regulated human protein-tyrosine kinase gene of the EPH family. Hum Mol Genet 1995, 4(11):2033-2045. 10.1093/hmg/4.11.2033, 8589679.
81. Birgbauer E, Oster SF, Severin CG, Sretavan DW. Retinal axon growth cones respond to EphB extracellular domains as inhibitory axon guidance cues. Development 2001, 128(15):3041-3048.
82. Himanen JP, Nikolov DB. Eph receptors and ephrins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003, 35(2):130-134. 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00096-1, 12479863.
83. Sturz A, Bader B, Thierauch KH, Glienke J. EphB4 signaling is capable of mediating ephrinB2-induced inhibition of cell migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 313:80-88. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.092, 14672701.
84. Pasquale EB. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6(6):462-475. 10.1038/nrm1662, 15928710., http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1662
85. Brambilla R, Klein R. Telling axons where to grow: a role for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases in guidance. Mol Cell Neurosci 1995, 6(6):487-495. 10.1006/mcne.1995.0001, 8742266., http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mcne.1995.0001
86. Dickson BJ. Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance. Science 2002, 298(5600):1959-1964. 10.1126/science.1072165, 12471249., http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1072165
87. Huot J. Ephrin signaling in axon guidance. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2004, 28(5):813-818. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.025, 15363605., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.05.025