Identification of functional modules from conserved ancestral protein-protein interactions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 13, 2007, Pages

  Dutkowski, Janusz ^a   Tiuryn, Jerzy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETIC CONSERVATION; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34547840254     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm194     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Berg, J. and Lassig, M. (2006) Cross-species analysis of biological networks by Bayesian alignment. PNAS, 103, 10967.
2. Berg, J. et al. (2004) Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: A statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. BMC Evolution. Biol., 4, 51.
3. Durand, D. et al. (2006) A hybrid micro-macroevolutionary approach to gene tree reconstruction. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 320-335.
4. Enright, A.J. et al. (2002) An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 1575-1584.
5. Felsenstein, J. (2005) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, US. Distributed by the author.
6. Flannick, J. et al. (2006) Graemlin: General and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Res., 16, 1169-1181.
7. Górecki, P. and Tiuryn, J. (2006) Inferring phylogeny from whole genomes. Bioinformatics, 23, e116-e122.
8. Higgins, D. et al. (1994) CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive-multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673-4680.
9. Hirsh, E. and Sharan, R. (2006) Identification of conserved protein complexes based on a model of protein network evolution. Bioinformatics, 23, e170-e176.
10. Kelley, B.P. et al. (2003) Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 11394-11399.
11. Koyuturk, M. et al. (2006) Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 182-199.
12. Matthews, L.R. et al. (2001) Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or 'interologs'. Genome Res., 11 2120-2126.
13. Mewes, H.W. et al. (2006) MIPS: Analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D169-D172.
14. Neapolitan, R.E. (2003) Learning Bayesian Networks. NJ: Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
15. Page, R. and Charleston, M. (1997) From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene treespecies tree problem. Mol Phylogenet Evol., 7, 231-240.
16. Pastor-Satorras, R. et al. (2003) Evolving protein interaction networks through gene duplication. J. Theor. Biol., 222, 199-210.
17. Salwinski, L. et al. (2004) The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D449.
18. Sharan, R. and Ideker, T. (2006) Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 427-433.
19. Sharan, R. et al. (2005a) Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102 1974-1979.
20. Sharan, R. et al. (2005b) Identification of protein complexes by comparative analysis of yeast and bacterial protein interaction data. J. Comput. Biol., 12, 835-846.
21. Sole, R.V. et al. (2002) A model of large-scale proteome evolution. Adv. Compl. Syst., 5, 43.
22. Tatusov, R.L. et al. (2003) The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics, 4.
23. Wagner, A. (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 18, 1283-1292.