When hearing turns into playing: Movement induction by auditory stimuli in pianists

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1376-1389

  Drost, Ulrich C ^a   Rieger, Martina ^a   Brass, Marcel ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SOUND DETECTION;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 33644875811     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: 14640740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000610     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bangert, M., & Altenmüller, E. O. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neuroscience, 4, 26-36.
2. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45-73.
3. Deutsch, D. (1999). The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 349-411). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., & Prinz, W. (in press). Action-effect coupling in pianists. Psychological Research.
5. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
6. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
7. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning (Vol 18). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
8. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect-toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
9. Hommel, B., Müsseier, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
10. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: MacMillan.
11. Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297-1303.
12. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J. W. (1995). Stimulus response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
13. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
14. Mudd, S. A. (1963). Spatial stereotypes of 4 dimensions of pure-tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 347-352.
15. Pitt, M. A. (1995). Evidence for a central representation of instrument timbre. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 43-55.
16. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
17. Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525-559.
18. Schön, D., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Besson, M. (2002). An fMRI study of music sight-reading. Neuroreport, 13, 2285-2289.
19. Schubö, A., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments. Psychological Research, 65, 145-157.
20. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor &T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Physiology, 51, 300-304.
22. Spitzer, M. (2002). Musik im Kopf [Music in the head]. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer.
23. Stewart, L., Henson, R., Kampe, K., Walsh, V., Turner, R., & Frith, U. (2003). Brain changes after learning to read and play music. Neuroimage, 20, 71-83.
24. Stewart, L., Walsh, V., & Frith, U. (2004). Reading music modifies spatial mapping in pianists. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 183-195.
25. Zakay, D., & Glicksohn, J. (1985). Stimulus congruity and S-R compatibility as determinants of interference in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 414-423.