Acquisition and generalization of action effects

Visual Cognition

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 965-986

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a   Alonso, Diego ^b   Fuentes, Luis J ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0242690235     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000176     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allan, L. G., & Jenkins, H. M. (1980). The judgment of contingency and the nature of the response alternatives. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 1-11.
2. Alonso, D., & Fuentes, L. J. (2000). Symmetric inferences: Another qualitative difference between implicit and explicit learning? Paper presented at the 27th International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
4. Bolles, R. C. (1972). Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review, 79, 394-409.
5. Brogden, W. J. (1962). Contiguous conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 172-176.
6. Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600-602.
7. Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2003). Spontaneous but goal-dependent binding of actions and their effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
9. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (in press). Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition of action effects. Psychological Research.
10. Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. NeuroImage, 17, 364-372.
11. Estévez, A. F., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in four-year-old children. Psicológica, 24, 159-167.
12. Estévez, A. F., Fuentes, L. J., Mari-Beffa, P., Gonzáles, C., & Alvarez, D. (2001). The differential outcomes effect as useful tool to improve conditional discrimination learning in children. Learning and Motivation, 32, 48-64.
13. Estévez, A. F., Fuentes, L. J., Overmier, B., & González, C. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children and adults with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 108-116.
14. Estévez, A. F., Overmier, B., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children: Demonstration and mechanisms. Learning and Motivation, 34, 148-167.
15. Gerolin, M., & Matute, H. (1999). Bidirectional associations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 27, 42-49.
16. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
17. Hall, J. F. (1984). Backward conditioning in pavlovian type studies: Re-evaluation and present status. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 19, 163-168.
18. Hazeltine, E. (2002). The representational nature of sequence learning: Evidence for goal-based codes. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention andperformancc XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 673-689). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stoecker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470-482.
20. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
21. Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176-186.
22. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one's own action-and what it leads to. In J.S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory ofevent coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
25. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
26. Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, 1-17.
27. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124.
28. Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236-259.
29. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
30. Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica, 109, 137-155.
31. Lewicki, P. (1986). Processing information about covariations that cannot be articulated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 135-146.
32. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
33. Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P., & Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory. Learning and Motivation, 19, 317-344.
34. McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., Kledaras, J. B., de Rose, J. C., & Stodderd, L. T. (1992). In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds. , Understanding verbal relations (pp. 43-67), Reno, NV: Context Press.
35. Meck, W. H. (1985). Postreinforcement signal processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 52-70.
36. Murdock, B. B. (1958). "Backward" associations in transfer and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 111-114.
37. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronounciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 401-418.
38. Posner, M. I., Nissen, J. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
39. Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111-144). New York: Academic Press.
40. Scheerer, E. (1984). Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 77-98). Berlin: Springer.
41. Schreuder, R., Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339-354.
42. Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. The psychology of learning and motivation, 21, 229-261.
43. Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 165-173.
44. Toni, I., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. (1997). A comparison of externally and internally guided motor learning. NeuroImage, 5, 252.
45. Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different reinforcing events discriminably different? Learning and Motivation, 1, 129-140.
46. Trapold, M. A., & Overmier, J. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental conditioning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 427-452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
47. Urcuioli, P. J., & DeMarse, T. (1996). Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 192-204.
48. Waldmann, M. B., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222-236.
49. Wasserman, E. A. (1990). Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 27-82.
50. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962-978.
51. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.