Differences between intention-based and stimulus-based actions

Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 9-20

  Keller, Peter E ^a,c   Wascher, Edmund ^a,e   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a   Waszak, Florian ^a,d   Koch, Iring ^a   Rosenbaum, David A ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

^d CNRS   (France)

^e LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERPs; P3; Readiness potential; Voluntary action

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 33645739101     PISSN: 02698803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803.20.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allport, D.A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48, 66-79.
3. Cisek, P., Crammond, D.J., & Kalaska, J.F. (2003). Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 922-942.
4. Deecke, L., & Lang, W. (1990). Movement-related potentials and complex actions: Coordinating role of the supplementary motor area. In J.C. Eccles & O. Creutzfeldt (Eds.), The principles of design and operation of the brain (pp. 303-336). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Desimone R., & Duncan J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
6. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, 27, 229-240.
7. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). Cortical mechanism for the visual guidance of hand grasping movements in the monkey: A reversible inactivation study. Brain, 124, 571-586.
8. Frith, C.D. (1992). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Frith, C.D. (2000). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes. Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Gallese, V., Murata, A., Kaseda, M., Niki, N., & Sakata, H. (1994). Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. Neuroreport, 5, 1525-1529.
11. Goldberg, G. (1985). Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 567-616.
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
13. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Sirevaag, E.J., Eriksen, C.W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
14. Greenwald, A.G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
15. Haggard, P., Aschersleben, G., Gehrke, J. & Prinz, W. (2002). Action, binding, and awareness. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance, vol. XIX (pp. 266-285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382-385.
17. Haggard, P., & Eimer, M. (1999). On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 128-133.
18. Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
20. Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227-245.
21. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R.P., & Mazziotta, J.C. (1996). Brain-behavior relationships: Evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 321-331.
22. Jahanshahi, M., & Frith, C.D. (1998). Wined action and its impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 483-533.
23. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
24. Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297-1303.
25. Kornhuber, H.H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale [Brain potential changes during voluntary and passive movements in humans: The readiness potential and reafferent potentials]. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284, 1-17.
26. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387-394.
27. Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of unconscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529-566.
28. Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., & Pearl, D.K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106, 623-642.
29. Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
30. Lotze, R.H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or physiology of the mind]. Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
31. Luppino, G., Murata, A., Govoni, P., & Matelli, M. (1999). Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Experimental Brain Research, 128, 181-187.
32. Passingham, R.E. (1985). Memory of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with lesions in prefrontal cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 3-21.
33. Passingham, R.E., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M.F. (2000). Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: The ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 103-113.
34. Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003). Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: A high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 309-322.
35. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
37. Rizzolatti, G., Camarda, R., Fogassi, L., Gentilucci, M., Luppino, G., & Matelli, M. (1988). Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 491-507.
38. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Murata, A., & Mine, S. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 429-438.
39. Spence, S.A., Brooks, D.J., Hirsch, S.R., Liddle, P.F., Meehan, J., & Grasby, P.M. (1997). A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain, 120, 1997-2011.
40. Thut, G., Hauert, C.A., Viviani, P., Morand, S., Spinelli, L., Blanke, O., Landis, T., & Michel, C. (2000). Internally driven vs. externally cued movement selection: A study on the timing of brain activity. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 261-269.
41. Toni, I., Rushworth, M.F., & Passingham, R.E. (2001). Neural correlates of visuomotor associations: Spatial rules compared with arbitrary rules. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 359-369.
42. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 165-181.
43. Wascher, E., Reinhard, M., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (1999). Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 214-229.
44. Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162.
45. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., Allport, D.A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
46. Waszak, F., Wascher, E., Keller, P., Koch, I., Aschersleben, G., Rosenbaum, D., & Prinz, W. (2005). Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 346-356.
47. Wegner, D.M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Wise, S.P., Di Pellegrino, G., & Boussaoud, G. (1996). The premotor cortex and nonstandard sensorimotor mapping. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 74, 469-482.