Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 192-204

  Urcuioli, Peter J ^a   Demarse, Thomas ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002054217     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.2.192     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brodigan, D. L., & Peterson, G. B. (1976). Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 121-124.
2. Carlson, J. G., & Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1976). Mediators of the effects of magnitude of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 7, 184-196.
3. Chatlosh, D. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Memory and expectancy in delayed discrimination procedures. In I. Gormezano & E. A. Wasserman (Eds.), Learning and memory: The behavioral and biological substrates (pp. 61-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Colwill, R. M. (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 1-72). New York: Academic Press.
5. Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155-164.
6. Gumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated opérant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284-330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. DeLong, R. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 394-412.
8. DeMarse, T. B., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1993). Enhancement of matching acquisition by differential comparison-outcome associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 317-326.
9. Edwards, C. A., Jagielo, J. A., Zentall, T. R., & Hogan, D.E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244-259.
10. Fedorchak, P. M., & Bolles, R. C. (1986). Differential outcome effect using a biologically neutral outcome difference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 125-130.
11. Honig, W. K., & Dodd, P. W. D. (1986). Anticipation and intention in working memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.), Theories of animal memory (pp. 77-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Honig, W. K., Matheson, W. R., & Dodd, P. W. D. (1984). Outcome expectancies as mediators for discriminative responding. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 196-217.
13. Maki, P., Overmier, J. B., Delos, S., & Gutmann, A. J. (1995). Expectancies as factors influencing conditional discrimination performance of children. The Psychological Record, 45, 45-71.
14. Peterson, G. B. (1984). How expectancies guide behavior. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 135-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Peterson, G. B., & Trapold, M. A. (1980). Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons' delayed conditional discrimination performance. Learning and Motivation, 11, 267-288.
16. Peterson, G. B., & Trapold, M. A. (1982). Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 571-580.
17. Peterson, G. B., Wheeler, R. L., & Armstrong, G. D. (1978). Expectancies as mediators in the differential-reward conditional discrimination performance of pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 279-285.
18. Peterson, G. B., Wheeler, R. L., & Trapold, M. A. (1980). Enhancement of pigeons' conditional discrimination performances by expectancies of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 22-30.
19. Rescorla, R. A. (1987). A Pavlovian analysis of goal-directed behavior. American Psychologist, 42, 119-129.
20. Rescorla, R. A. (1992). Response-outcome versus outcomeresponse associations in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 223-232.
21. Rescorla, R. A. (1994). Transfer of instrumental control mediated by a devalued outcome. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 2733.
22. Rescorla, R. A., & Colwill, R. M. (1989). Associations with anticipated and obtained outcomes in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 291-303.
23. Rodger, R. S. (1975). The number of non-zero, post hoc contrasts
24. from ANOVA and error rate. I. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 71-78.
25. Santi, A., & Roberts, W. A. (1985). Prospective representation: The effects of varied mapping of sample stimuli to comparison stimuli and differential trial outcomes on pigeons' working memory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 103-108.
26. Saunders, R., & Sailor, W. (1979). A comparison of three strategies of reinforcement on two-choice learning problems with severely retarded children. AAESPH Review, 4, 323-333.
27. Shepp, B. E. (1962). Some cue properties of anticipated rewards in discrimination learning of retardates. Joumal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 856-859.
28. Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different reinforcing events discriminably different? Learning and Motivation, 1, 129-140.
30. Trapold, M. A., & Overmier, J. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 427-452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31. Urcuioli, P. J. (1990). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons' delayed matching. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 302-314.
32. Urcuioli, P. J. (1991). Retardation and facilitation of matching acquisition by differential outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 29-36.
33. Urcuioli, P.J., & DeMarse, T.B. (1994). On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 249-263.
34. Urcuioli, P. J., & Zentall, T. R. (1990). On the role of trial outcomes in delayed discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 141-150.
35. Urcuioli, P. J., & Zentall, T. R. (1992). Transfer across delayed discriminations: Evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 154-173.
36. Urcuioli, P. J., & Zentall, T. R. (1993). A test of comparisonstimulus substitutability following one-to-many matching by pigeons. Tlie Psychological Record, 43, 745-759.
37. Wasserman, E. A. (1986). Prospection and retrospection as processes of animal short-term memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.), Theories of animal memory (pp. 53-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Williams, D. A., Butler, M. M., & Overmier, J. B. (1990). Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 3-13.