Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action

Current Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 493-498

  Hamilton, Antonia ^a   Wolpert, Daniel ^b   Frith, Uta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WEIGHT PERCEPTION;

EID: 1842535187     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 119:1996;593-609.
2. Decety J., Grezes J., Costes N., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Procyk E., Grassi F., Fazio F. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain. 120:1997;1763-1777.
3. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. 286:1999;2526-2528.
4. Grezes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions. a meta-analysis Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:2001;1-19.
5. Umilta M.A., Kohler E., Gallese V., Fogassi L., Fadiga L., Keysers C., Rizzolatti G. I know what you are doing. a neurophysiological study. Neuron. 31:2001;155-165.
6. Gallese V., Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;493-501.
7. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2:2001;661-670.
8. Wohlschlager A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Res. 40:2000;925-930.
9. Brass M., Bekkering H., Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol. (Amst.). 106:2001;3-22.
10. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11:1998;1317-1329.
11. Haruno M., Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 13:2001;2201-2220.
12. Wolpert D.M., Doya K., Kawato M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358:2003;593-602.
13. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements. comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues Brain Cogn. 44:2000;124-143.
14. Wohlschlager A., Bekkering H. Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence. Exp. Brain Res. 143:2002;335-341.
15. Edwards M.G., Humphreys G.W., Castiello U. Motor facilitation following action observation. A behavioural study in prehensile action Brain Cogn. 53:2003;495-502.
16. Castiello U., Lusher D., Mari M., Edwards M.G., Humphreys G.W. Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object. differential motor priming effects Prinz W., Hommel B. Attention and performance XIX. 2002;314-334 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. p.
17. Kilner J.M., Paulignan Y., Blakemore S.J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 13:2003;522-525.
18. Kohler E., Keysers C., Umilta M.A., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Hearing sounds, understanding actions. action representation in mirror neurons Science. 297:2002;846-848.
19. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation. a magnetic stimulation study J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;2608-2611.
20. Strafella A.P., Paus T. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation. a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Neuroreport. 11:2000;2289-2292.
21. Bingham G.P. Kinematic form and scaling. further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 13:1987;155-177.
22. Runeson S., Frykholm G. Visual perception of lifted weight. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7:1981;733-740.
23. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage. 6:1997;231-236.
24. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage. 12:2000;478-484.
25. Vetter P., Wolpert D.M. Context estimation for sensorimotor control. J. Neurophysiol. 84:2000;1026-1034.
26. Knoblich G., Seigerschmidt E., Flach R., Prinz W. Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes. evidence for action simulation during action perception Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 55:2002;1027-1046.
27. Knoblich G., Flach R. Predicting the effects of actions. interactions of perception and action Psychol. Sci. 12:2001;467-472.
28. Wohlschlager A. Mental and manual rotation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24:1998;397-412.
29. Wohlschlaeger A. Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Percept. Psychophys. 63:2001;709-718.
30. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umilta C.A., Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. Neuroreport. 8:1996;347-349.
31. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G., Umilta C. Action for perception. a motor-visual attentional effect J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25:1999;1673-1692.
32. Craighero L., Bello A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;492-502.
33. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;11656-11661.
34. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron. 35:2002;1167-1175.
35. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358:2003;435-445.
36. Muesseler J., Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23:1997;861-872.
37. Wuhr P., Musseler J. Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;1260-1270.
38. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC). a framework for perception and action planning Behav Brain Sci. 24:2001;849-878. discussion 878-937.
39. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. Eur. J. Cog. Psychol. 9:1997;129-154.
40. Flanagan J.R., King S., Wolpert D.M., Johansson R.S. Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 55:2001;87-95.
41. Davidson P.R., Wolpert D.M. Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13:2003;232-237.
42. McLeod P., Plunkett K., Rolls E.T. Introduction to Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes. 1998;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Leube D.T., Knoblich G., Erb M., Grodd W., Bartels M., Kircher T.T. The neural correlates of perceiving one's own movements. Neuroimage. 20:2003;2084-2090.