Blindness to Response-Compatible Stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 861-872

  Müsseler, Jochen ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; VISION;

ADULT; HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031156965     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arend, U., & Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical receding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
2. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
3. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1993). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In S. J. Hanson, J. D. Cowan, & C. L. Giles (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 5, pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
4. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
5. Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. (1965). On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 61-67.
6. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
7. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
8. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, M. I. ( 1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
9. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
10. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
11. Gottsdanker, R. (1980). The ubiquitous role of preparation. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 355-371). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
13. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
14. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
15. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
16. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
17. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (1997). Visual attention and the selection of manual responses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
20. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
22. Kanwisher, N. G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
23. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1989). Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement. Memory and Cognition, 17, 117-124.
24. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
25. Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
26. Komblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
27. Kwak, H. W., & Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 455-464.
28. Lotze, H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or the physiology of the mind]. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann.
29. Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 95-113.
30. MacKay, D. G. (1986). Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 174-186). London: Springer-Verlag.
31. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. MacKay, D. G., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Semantic blindness: Repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall under time pressure. Psychological Science, 5, 52-55.
33. Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Mechanisms of attention: Attention and performance (Vol. 11, pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Mudd, S. A. (1963). Spatial stereotypes of four dimensions of pure tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 347-352.
35. Müsseler, J. (1995). Wahrnehmung und Handlungsplanung. Effekte kompatibler und inkompatibler Reize bei der Initiierung und Ausführung von Reaktions-sequenzen [Perception and action planning. Effects of compatible and incompatible stimuli during initialization and performance of reaction sequences]. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
36. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125-129.
37. Müsseler, J. & Prinz, W. (1996). Action planning during the presentation of stimulus sequences: Effects of compatible and incompatible stimuli. Psychological Research, 59, 48-63.
38. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435-448.
39. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673.
40. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
41. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
42. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
43. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
44. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Control of language processes: Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition in return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 117-120.
46. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
47. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
48. Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., & Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Das Gedächtnis: Probleme-Trends-Perspektiven [The memory: Problems, trends, perspectives] (pp. 129-168). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
49. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccadic preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attented locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
50. Simon, J. R., Mewaldt, S. P., Acosta, Jr., E., & Hu, J. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 354-358.
51. Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-37.
52. Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., & Neill, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
53. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Short report: Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
54. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.
55. Umiltà C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.
56. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
57. Welford, A. T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 215-252). London: Academic Press.
58. Wühr, P. (1995). Zwei Experimente zum Einfluß auszuführender Handlungen auf die Wahrnehmung kompatibler bzw. inkompatibler Reize [Two experiments on the impact of actions on the perception of compatible and incompatible stimuli]. Unpublished manuscript, Munich, Germany.