Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 387-394

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 85047685980     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.387     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and choice time. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 106-118.
2. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
3. Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Paprotta, I. (1998). Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5(1-2), 81-107.
4. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
5. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
6. Greenwald, A. G. (1970a). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 20-25.
7. Greenwald, A. G. (1970b). A double stimulation test of ideomotor theory with implications for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 392-398.
8. Greenwald, A. G. (1970c). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
9. Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50-73.
10. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
11. Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis [Anticipation and cognition]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
12. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270-279.
13. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 261-268.
14. Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 59, 176-186.
15. Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one's own action - and what it leads to. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems theory and a priori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
17. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX: Information processing (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
19. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig, Germany: Weidman' sehe Buchhandlung.
20. Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Leuthold, H. (1999, March). Kompatibilitätseffekte durch irrelevante Reizmerkmale in einer nicht-räumlichen Anordnung [Compatibility effects by irrelevant stimulus features in a non-spatial arrangement]. Paper presented at the 41st meeting of Experimental Psychologists, Leipzig, Germany.
21. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., & Ladavas, E. (1984). Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica, 57, 133-143.
22. Rescorla, R. A. (1991). Associations of multiple outcomes with an instrumental response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 465-474.
23. Rescorla, R. A. (1995). Full preservation of a response-outcome association through training with a second outcome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48(B), 252-261.
24. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. G., & Umiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89-100.
25. Romaiguere, P., Hasbroucq, T., Possamai, C. A., & Seal, J. (1993). Intensity to force translation: A new effect of stimulus response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 197-201.
26. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Krist, H. (1996). Antecedents of action. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, Vol. 2: Motor skills (pp. 3-69). London, England: Academic Press.
27. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umiltà, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
28. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
29. Stevens, J. C., Mack, J. D., & Stevens, S. S. (1960). Growth of sensation on seven continua as measured by force of handgrip. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 60-67.
30. Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 972-990.