An analysis of ideomotor action

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 130, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 779-798

  Knuf, Lothar ^a,b   Aschersleben, Gisa ^a   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b Grundig AG UsabilityLabor   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 85047685317     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.779     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 93-130). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bargh, J. A., & Barndollar, K. (1996). Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 457-481). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Bargh, J. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1994). Environmental control of goal-directed action: Automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 41, 71-124.
6. Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti- and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410-427.
7. Bortz, J. (1989). Lehrbuch der Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for the social sciences]. Berlin: Springer.
8. Carpenter, W. B. (1874). Principles of mental physiology, with their applications to the training and discipline of the mind and the study of its morbid conditions. New York: Appleton.
9. Charter, R. A., & Larsen, B. S. (1983). Fisher's z to r. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 41-42.
10. De Maeght, S., Knuf, L., & Prinz, W. (2001). Action related intentions in ideomotor action. Manuscript in preparation.
11. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanism in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
13. Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 52-57.
14. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
15. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
16. Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness. New York: Wiley.
17. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (in press). A theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
18. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Holt.
19. Keele, S. W. (1986). Motor control. In J. K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance (Vol. 2, pp. 30.1-30.60). New York: Wiley.
20. Kleint, H. (1936). Versuche über die Wahrnehmung [Studies on perception]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 131, 1-34.
21. Kleint, H. (1940). Versuche über die Wahrnehmung [Studies on perception]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 149, 31-82.
22. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or mental physiology]. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung.
23. Mottet, D., Benoît, G. B., & Athènes, S. (1994). A note on data smoothing for movement analysis: The relevance of a nonlinear method. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26(1), 51-55.
24. Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 225-294). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Pfungst, O. (1907). Das Pferd des Herrn von Osten (Derkluge Hans) [Herr von Osten's horse (Clever Hans)]. Leipzig, Germany: Barth.
26. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideomotor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.
28. Prinz, W. (in press-a). Experimental approaches to imitation. In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29. Prinz, W. (in press-b). How do we know about our own actions. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. Richter, H. (1954). Über ideomotorische Phänomene [Ideomotor phenomena]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 157, 201-257.
31. Richter, H. (1957). Zum Problem der ideomotorischen Phänomene [The problem of ideomotor phenomena]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 161, 161-254.
32. Spitz, H. H. (1997). Nonconscious movements. From mystical messages to facilitated communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Ideo-motor action. Psychological Review, 20, 91-106.
34. Winter, D. A. (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley.
35. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.