Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output

Language Learning

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 439-473

  Tavakoli, Parvaneh ^a   Foster, Pauline ^b,c  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b St Mary's University College   (Canada)

^c ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Limited attention model; Multiple pool model; Narrative structure; Processing capacity; Second language performance; Storyline complexity; Task effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149167559     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00446.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learners' narratives. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, 144 161.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (4 471 508.
4. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kapperl, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10 (3 245 261.
5. Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., Norris, J. M., & Bonk, W. (2002). An investigation of second language task-based performance assessment. Honolulu : University of Hawaii Press.
6. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134 146). London : Heineman.
7. Bygate, M. (1999). Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 3 (3 185 214.
8. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23 49). London : Longman.
9. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. London : Longman.
10. Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds Language learning tasks (pp. 5 22). London : Prentice Hall.
11. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. New York : Cambridge University Press.
12. Cheng, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92 (3 414 423.
13. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197 262). New York : Cambridge University Press.
14. Dry, H. (1983). The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics, 12, 19 53.
15. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Talking task to task. In R. Day (Ed Talking to learn (pp. 147 181). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
16. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12 20.
17. Ellis, R. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49 75). London : Longman.
18. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75 95). London : Longman.
19. Foster, P. (in preparation). Lexical diversity and native-like selection: The bonus of studying abroad. Manuscript in prepation.
20. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performances. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299 323.
21. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3 (3 215 247.
22. Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (in preparation). The impact of narrative structure on native speaker task performance. Manuscript in preparation.
23. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3 354 375.
24. Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Givón, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 1008 1025). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Harris, C., & Bates, E. (2002). Clausal background and pronominal reference: A functionalist approach to c-command. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17 (3 237 269.
27. Heaton, J. B. (1966). Composition through pictures. Essex : Longman.
28. Hooper, P. J., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251 299.
29. Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., & Elder, C. (2001). Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51 (3 401 436.
30. Jones, L. (1980). Notions in English. Cambridge : University Press.
31. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
32. Levelt, W. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its order. In G. Blanken, H. Dittman, H. Grimm, J. Marshal, & C. Wallesch (Eds Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 1 15). Berlin : de Gruyter.
33. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of the research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359 382.
34. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77 99). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
35. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 14 41). New York : Cambridge University Press.
36. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2001). "A case of exercising": Effects of immediate task repetition on learners' performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141 63). London : Longman.
37. Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19 (1 85 104.
38. Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. (1988). The structure of discourse and subordination. In J. Haiman & S. Thompson (Eds Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 95 120). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
39. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different length of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (1 83 108.
40. Navon, D. (1989). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 191 238.
41. Neumann, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann & A. Sanders (Eds Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 3. Attention (pp. 389 446). San Diego : Academic Press.
42. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
43. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Buckingham, UK : Open University Press.
44. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds Language and cmmunication. London : Longman.
45. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (2000). The one clause at a time hypothesis. In H. Riggenbach (Ed Perspectives on fluency (pp. 163 191). Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
46. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493 527.
47. Pica, T. (1996). The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom. JALT Journal, 78, 241 268.
48. Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds Tasks and language learning (pp. 35 56). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
49. Polanyi-Bowditch, L. (1976). Why the whats are when: Mutually contextualizing realms of narrative. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2, 59 77.
50. Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779 809.
51. Robinson, P. (2000). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1 27 55.
52. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287 318). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
53. Robinson, P. (2003). The cognitive hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21 (2 45 107.
54. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 43 (1 45 107.
55. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119 141). London : Longman.
56. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I: Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1 66.
57. Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form: A myth in the making. ELT, 57 (3 225 233.
58. Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84 (2 127 190.
59. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
60. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1 (3 185 212.
61. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49 (1 93 120.
62. Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In B. Freed (Ed Foreign language acquisition: Research and the classroom (pp. 91 103). Lexington, MA : Heath.
63. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 245 256). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
64. Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26 (2 376 401.
65. Swan, M., & Walter, C. (1990). New Cambridge English course: Workbook level 1. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
66. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York : Harper Collins.
67. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239 277). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
68. Tomlin, R. (1984). The treatment of foreground-background information in the on-line descriptive discourse of second language learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 115 142.
69. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287 301.
70. von Stutterheim, C 1991). Narrative and description: Temporal reference in second language acquisition. In C. A. Ferguson & T. Huebner (Eds Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 385 403). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
71. Wigglesworth, G. (2001). Influences on performance in task-based oral assessments. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language teaching, learning and testing (pp. 186 210). London : Longman.
72. Willis, J., & Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. London : Heinemann.
73. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effect of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 23 (1 1 27.