ATM regulates Mre11-dependent DNA end-degradation and microhomology- mediated end joining

Cell Cycle

Volumn 9, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 2938-2949

  Rahal, Elias A ^a,f   Henricksen, Leigh A ^a   Li, Yuling ^b,g   Williams, R Scott ^c   Tainer, John A ^c,d   Dixon, Kathleen ^a,e  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^f AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^g Humacyte   (United States)

Author keywords

ATM; DNA degradation; Double strand break repair; Microhomology mediated end joining; Mre11; MRN complex; PI 3 kinase like kinases

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ENZYME INHIBITOR; ENZYME INHIBITOR MIRIN; EXONUCLEASE; MRE11 PROTEIN; SHORT HAIRPIN RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA DENATURATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MAMMAL CELL; MICROHOMOLOGY MEDIATED END JOINING; NONHUMAN;

ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 77956819782     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.14.12363     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Peterson CL, Cote J. Cellular machineries for chromosomal DNA repair. Genes Dev 2004; 18:602-16.
2. van Gent DC, Hoeijmakers JH, Kanaar R. Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:196-206.
3. Taylor AM, Byrd PJ. Molecular pathology of ataxia telangiectasia. J Clin Pathol 2005; 58:1009-15.
4. Lavin MF, Kozlov S. ATM activation and DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:931-42.
5. DiBiase SJ, Zeng ZC, Chen R, Hyslop T, Curran WJJr, Iliakis G. DNA-dependent protein kinase stimulates an independently active, nonhomologous, end-joining apparatus. Cancer Res 2000; 60:1245-53.
6. Feldmann E, Schmiemann V, Goedecke W, Reichenberger S, Pfeiffer P. DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:2585-96.
7. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Huck S, Bertrand P, Pirzio L, Desmaze C, Sabatier L, et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 2004; 14:611-23.
8. Liang F, Jasin M. Ku80-deficient cells exhibit excess degradation of extrachromosomal DNA. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:14405-11.
9. 2. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7:329-38.
10. Zhu C, Mills KD, Ferguson DO, Lee C, Manis J, Fleming J, et al. Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations. Cell 2002; 109:811-21.
11. Li Y, Carty MP, Oakley GG, Seidman MM, Medvedovic M, Dixon K. Expression of ATM in ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts rescues defects in DNA double-strand break repair in nuclear extracts. Environ Mol Mutagen 2001; 37:128-40.
12. Ma JL, Kim EM, Haber JE, Lee SE. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:8820-8.
13. Lee K, Lee SE. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining. Genetics 2007; 176:2003-14.
14. Paull TT, Gellert M. A mechanistic basis for Mre11-directed DNA joining at microhomologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:6409-14.
15. Rass E, Grabarz A, Plo I, Gautier J, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:819-24.
16. Xie A, Kwok A, Scully R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:814-8.
17. Williams RS, Williams JS, Tainer JA. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling and the chromatin template. Biochem Cell Biol 2007; 85:509-20.
18. Nelms BE, Maser RS, MacKay JF, Lagally MG, Petrini JH. In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts. Science 1998; 280:590-2.
19. You Z, Chahwan C, Bailis J, Hunter T, Russell P. ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5363-79.
20. Wu X, Ranganathan V, Weisman DS, Heine WF, Ciccone DN, O'Neill TB, et al. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 2000; 405:477-82.
21. Lim DS, Kim ST, Xu B, Maser RS, Lin J, Petrini JH, et al. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 2000; 404:613-7.
22. Kim JE, Minter-Dykhouse K, Chen J. Signaling networks controlled by the MRN complex and MDC1 during early DNA damage responses. Mol Carcinog 2006; 45:403-8.
23. Rahal EA, Henricksen LA, Li Y, Turchi JJ, Pawelczak KS, Dixon K. ATM mediates repression of DNA end-degradation in an ATP-dependent manner. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7:464-75.
24. Canman CE, Lim DS, Cimprich KA, Taya Y, Tamai K, Sakaguchi K, et al. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science 1998; 281:1677-9.
25. Lee JH, Paull TT. Direct activation of the ATM protein kinase by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex. Science 2004; 304:93-6.
26. van den Bosch M, Bree RT, Lowndes NF. The MRN complex: coordinating and mediating the response to broken chromosomes. EMBO Rep 2003; 4:844-9.
27. Yuan SS, Chang HL, Hou MF, Chan TF, Kao YH, Wu YC, et al. Neocarzinostatin induces Mre11 phosphorylation and focus formation through an ATM- and NBS1-dependent mechanism. Toxicology 2002; 177:123-30.
28. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Ostheimer GJ, van Vugt MA, Jorgensen C, Miron IM, et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 2007; 129:1415-26.
29. Garner KM, Pletnev AA, Eastman A. Corrected structure of mirin, a small-molecule inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nat Chem Biol 2009; 5:129-30.
30. Dupre A, Boyer-Chatenet L, Sattler RM, Modi AP, Lee JH, Nicolette ML, et al. A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nat Chem Biol 2008; 4:119-25.
31. Paull TT, Gellert M. The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 1998; 1:969-79.
32. Bentley J, Diggle CP, Harnden P, Knowles MA, Kiltie AE. DNA double strand break repair in human bladder cancer is error prone and involves microhomology-associated end-joining. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:5249-59.
33. Shin KH, Kang MK, Kim RH, Kameta A, Baluda MA, Park NH. Abnormal DNA end-joining activity in human head and neck cancer. Int J Mol Med 2006; 17:917-24.
34. Weinstock DM, Elliott B, Jasin M. A model of oncogenic rearrangements: differences between chromosomal translocation mechanisms and simple double-strand break repair. Blood 2006; 107:777-80.
35. Windhofer F, Krause S, Hader C, Schulz WA, Florl AR. Distinctive differences in DNA double-strand break repair between normal urothelial and urothelial carcinoma cells. Mutat Res 2008; 638:56-65.
36. Yoshimoto M, Joshua AM, Chilton-Macneill S, Bayani J, Selvarajah S, Evans AJ, et al. Three-color FISH analysis of TMPRSS2/ERG fusions in prostate cancer indicates that genomic microdeletion of chromosome 21 is associated with rearrangement. Neoplasia 2006; 8:465-9.
37. Williams RS, Moncalian G, Williams JS, Yamada Y, Limbo O, Shin DS, et al. Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 2008; 135:97-109.
38. Langland G, Elliott J, Li Y, Creaney J, Dixon K, Groden J. The BLM helicase is necessary for normal DNA double-strand break repair. Cancer Res 2002; 62:2766-70.
39. Audebert M, Salles B, Calsou P. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:55117-26.
40. Gottlich B, Reichenberger S, Feldmann E, Pfeiffer P. Rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in vitro by single-strand annealing. Eur J Biochem 1998; 258:387-95.
41. Decottignies A. Microhomology-mediated end joining in fission yeast is repressed by pku70 and relies on genes involved in homologous recombination. Genetics 2007; 176:1403-15.
42. Williams RS, Dodson GE, Limbo O, Yamada Y, Williams JS, Guenther G, et al. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell 2009; 139:87-99.
43. Hopfner KP, Tainer JA. Rad50/SMC proteins and ABC transporters: unifying concepts from high-resolution structures. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2003; 13:249-55.
44. Corneo B, Wendland RL, Deriano L, Cui X, Klein IA, Wong SY, et al. Rag mutations reveal robust alternative end joining. Nature 2007; 449:483-6.
45. Guirouilh-Barbat J, Rass E, Plo I, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:20902-7.
46. Soulas-Sprauel P, Le Guyader G, Rivera-Munoz P, Abramowski V, Olivier-Martin C, Goujet-Zalc C, et al. Role for DNA repair factor XRCC4 in immunoglobulin class switch recombination. J Exp Med 2007; 204:1717-27.
47. Yan CT, Boboila C, Souza EK, Franco S, Hickernell TR, Murphy M, et al. IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway. Nature 2007; 449:478-82.