Influence of force and torque feedback on operator performance in a VR-based suturing task

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 217-230

  Santos Carreras, L ^a   Beira, R ^a   Sengul A ^a   Gassert, R ^b   Bleule, H ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Force feedback; Haptic IO; Psycophysics; Suture accuracy; Teleoperated surgery; Torque feedback

Indexed keywords

HAPTIC INTERFACES; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TORQUE; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL); VISUAL COMMUNICATION; VISUAL SERVOING;

FORCE FEEDBACK; HAPTIC IO; PSYCOPHYSICS; SUTURE ACCURACY; TELEOPERATED; TORQUE FEEDBACK;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 77956407852     PISSN: 11762322     EISSN: 17542103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11762322.2010.503110     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abolhassani N, Patel R, Moallem M. 2007. Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey. Med Eng Phys. 29(4):413-431. Elsevier
2. Barbagli F, Salisbury JK. 2003. The effect of sensor/actuator asymmetries in haptic interfaces. In: HAPTICS. IEEE Computer Society, p. 140.
3. Barbé L, Bayle B, De Mathelin M, Gangi A. 2007a. In vivo model estimation and haptic characterisation of needle insertions. Int J Robot Res. 26(11-12):1283-1301.
4. Barbé L, Bayle B, De Mathelin M, Gangi A. 2007b. Needle insertions modeling: identifiability and limitations. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2(3):191-198.
5. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G, Schmid T. 2004. EACTS; first experiences with the da vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 25(5):844-851.
6. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin D, Milner T, Kawato M. 2001. Nature publishing group; the central nervous system stabilises unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature. 414(6862):446-449.
7. Cohen A, Chen E. 1999. Six degree-of-freedom haptic system as a desktop virtual prototyping interface. Asme Dyn Syst Control. 67:401-402. Citeseer.
8. Dasgupta P, Jones A, Gill I. 2005. Robotic urological surgery: a perspective. BJU Int. 95(1):20-23. Blackwell Science Ltd.
9. Ernst M, Banks M. 2002. Nature publishing group; humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 415(6870):429-433.
10. Gerovichev O, Marayong P, Okamura A. 2002. The effect of visual and haptic feedback on manual and teleoperated needle insertion. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, MICCAI 2002, Pt 1. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
11. Grange S, Conti F, Rouiller P, Helmer P, Baur C. 2001.Overviewof the delta haptic device. In: Proceedings of Eurohaptics. Vol. 1. Citeseer, Birmingham, England: Harper Collins.
12. Guthart G, Salisbury J. 2000.TheIntuitiveTMtelesurgerysystem: overview and application. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA. USA. pp. 618-621.
13. Hayward V, Gregorio P, Astley O, Greenish S, Doyon M, Lessard L, McDougall J, Sinclair I, Boelen S, Chen X, et al. 1998. Freedom-7: a high fidelity seven axis haptic device with application to surgical training. In: Experimental Robotics V. London: Springer Verlag, p. 443-456.
14. Hayward V, MacLean KE. 2007. Do it yourself haptics: part I. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 14(4):88-104.
15. Iwamoto H, Osaki H, Sheki S. 1993. The technical skill in suturing: an analysis of the actual suture tracks. Surg Today. (23):800-806.
16. Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S. 2003. Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center, USA. The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 13(4):279-283.
17. Okamura A. 2002. Measurement of the tip and friction force acting on a needle during penetration. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. London: Springer Verlag, p. 216-223.
18. Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura A, Yuh D. 2005.Effectofsensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thoracic and Cardiovas Surg. 129(1):151-158.
19. Lawrence D, Pao L, Salada M, Dougherty A. 1996. Quantitative experimental analysis of transparency and stability in haptic interfaces. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, Atlanta, GA. DSC 58:441-449. Citeseer.
20. Lee J, Hwang I, Kim K, Choi S, Chung WK, Kim YS. 2009. Cooperative robotic assistant with drill-by-wire end-effector for spinal fusion surgery. Ind Robot-An Int J. 36(1):60-72. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
21. Mack M. 2001. Am Med Assoc. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA. 285(5):568.
22. Massie T, Salisbury J. 1994. The phantom haptic interface: a eviceforprobingvirtualobjects.In:ProceedingsoftheASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for VirtualEnvironmentandTeleoperatorSystems.Vol.55.p.295-300.
23. McJunkin S, O'Malley M, Speich J. 2005.TransparencyofaPhantom premium haptic interface for active and passive human interaction. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Vol. 5. p. 3060.
24. Moser F, Horgan S. 2004. Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J. Surg. 188(4S1):38-44. Elsevier.
25. Nio D, Bemelman W, Boer K, Dunker M, Gouma D, Gulik T. 2002. Springer; efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardised tasks. Surg Endoscopy. 16(3):412-415.
26. Okamura AM, Simone C, O'Leary M. 2004. Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51(10):1707-1716.
27. Pheasant S. 1986. Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and design. London: Taylor Francis.
28. Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O. 2007. A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterisation of soft tissue response. Med Image Anal. 11(4):361-373. Elsevier Science.
29. Seibold U, Kuebler B, Hirzinger G. 2008. Prototypic force feedback instrument for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Medical robotics. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education and Publishing, p. 377-400.
30. Seki S. 1987. Accuracy of suture techniques of surgeons with different surgical experience. Japan J Surg. 17(6):465-469.
31. Seki S. 1988. Techniques for better suturing. Br J Surg. 75(12):1181-1184.
32. Semere W, Kitagawa M, Okamura AM. 2004. Teleoperation with ensor/actuatorasymmetry:taskperformancewithpartialforce feedback. In: HAPTICS. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, p. 121-127.
33. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F. 1994. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 14(5):3208. Soc Neuroscience.
34. Simone C, Okamura A. 2002. Modeling of needle insertion forces for robot-assisted percutaneous therapy In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 2. Citeseer, Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, p. 2085-2091.
35. Solis J, Oshima N, Ishii H, Matsuoka N, Hatake K, Takanishi A. 2008. Towards understanding the suture/ligature skills during the training process using WKS-2RII. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 3(3):231-239. Springer.
36. Toffin D, Reymond G, Kemeny A, Droulez J. 2007. Role of steering wheel feedback on driver performance: driving simulator and modeling analysis. Veh Syst Dyn. 45(4):375-388. Taylor & Francis.
37. Verner LN, Okamura AM. 2007. Effects of translational and gripping force feedback are decoupled in a 4-degree-of-freedom telemanipulator. In: WHC (World Haptics Conference). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, p. 286-291.
38. Verner LN, Okamura AM. 2009. Force and Torque Feedback vs. Force Only Feedback. In: Third Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
39. Wang F, Samur E, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2008. Development of a microsurgery training system. In: Conf Proc IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008, p. 1935-1938.