A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 361-373

  Samur, Evren ^a   Sedef, Mert ^a   Basdogan, Cagatay ^a   Avtan, Levent ^b   Duzgun, Oktay ^b  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Hyperelasticity; Inverse finite element solution; Laparoscopic surgery; Linear viscoelasticity; Minimally invasive measurement; Robotic indenter; Soft tissue characterization; Surgical simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VISCOELASTICITY;

INVERSE FINITE ELEMENT SOLUTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LINEAR VISCOELASTICITY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; ROBOTIC INDENTER; SOFT TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; SURGICAL SIMULATION;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ABDOMEN; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA EXTRACTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SIMULATOR; SOFT TISSUE; SWINE; TIME; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ABDOMEN; ANIMALS; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LIVER; ROBOTICS; SWINE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 34250821777     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2007.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Basdogan C., Ho C., and Srinivasan M.A. Virtual environments for medical training: graphical and haptic simulation of common bile duct exploration. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 6 3 (2001) 267-285
2. Basdogan C., De S., Kim J., Muniyandi M., and Srinivasan M.A. Haptics in minimally invasive surgical simulation and training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24 2 (2004) 56-64
3. Basdogan C., Sedef M., Harders M., and Wesarg S. VR-based simulators for training in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 27 2 (2007) 54-66
4. Brouwer, I., Ustin, J., Bentley, L., Sherman, A., Dhruv, N., Tendick, F., 2001. Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation. In: Proceedings of MMVR Conference, pp. 69-71.
5. Brown J.D., Rosen J., Kim Y.S., Chang L., Sinanan M.N., and Hannaford B. In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 94 (2003) 26-32
6. Carter F.J., Frank T.G., Davies P.J., McLean D., and Cuschieir A. Measurements and modeling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Medical Image Analysis 5 (2001) 231-236
7. Cavusoglu M.C., Feygin D., and Tendick F. A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the PHANToM haptic interface and improvements for high-performance control. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11 6 (2002) 555-568
8. Delingette H., and Ayache N. Soft tissue modeling for surgery simulation. In: Ayache N. (Ed). Computational Models for the Human Body: Handbook of Numerical Analysis (2004), Elsevier
9. Findley W.N., Lai J.S., and Onaran K. Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials (1976), Dover, New York
10. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. second ed. (1993), Springer-Verlag, New York
11. Gao L., Parker K.J., Lerner R.M., and Levinson S.F. Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue: a review. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 22 (1996) 959-977
12. Gefen A., and Margulies S.S. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?. Journal of Biomechanics 37 (2004) 1339-1352
13. Haddad Y.M. Viscoelasticity of Engineering Materials (1995), Chapman & Hall, London
14. Han L., Noble J.A., and Burcher M. A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 29 (2003) 813-823
15. Hu, T., Desai, J.P., 2004. Characterization of soft-tissue material properties: large deformation analysis. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Medical Simulation (Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 3078), Cambridge, MA, June 17-18, pp. 28-37.
16. Kauer, M., 2001. Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues with aspiration experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Mechanical Systems, Diss No: 14233, ETH, Zurich.
17. Kauer M., Vuskovic V., Dual J., Szekely G., and Bajka M. Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues. Medical Image Analysis 6 (2002) 275-287
18. Kim, J., 2003. Virtual environments for medical training: graphical and haptic simulation of tool-tissue interactions. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT.
19. Lakes R. Viscoelastic Solids (1998), CRC Press
20. Lee E.H., and Radok J.R.M. The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. Journal of Applied Mechanics 27 (1960) 438-444
21. Liu, Y., Kerdok, A.E., Howe, R.D., 2004. A nonlinear finite element model of soft tissue indentation. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Medical Simulation (Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 3078), Cambridge, MA, June 17-18,, pp. 67-76.
22. Manduca A., Oliphant T.E., Dresner M.A., Mahowald J.L., Kruse S.A., Amromin E., Felmlee J.P., Greenleaf J.F., and Ehman R.L. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Medical Image Analysis 5 (2001) 237-254
23. Miller K. Constitutive modeling of abdominal organs. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 367-373
24. Ottensmeyer, M.P., 2001. Minimally invasive instrument for in vivo measurement of solid organ mechanical impedance. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT.
25. Ottensmeyer, M.P., Kerdok, A.E., Howe, R.D., Dawson, S.L., 2004. The effects of testing environment on the viscoelastic properties of soft tissues. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Medical Simulation, pp. 9-18.
26. Rosen J., Hannaford B., MacFarlane M.P., and Sinanan M.N. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery-experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46 (1999) 1212-1221
27. Samani A., and Plewes D. A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples. Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 4395-4405
28. Samur, E., Sedef, M., Basdogan, C., Avtan, L., Duzgun, O., 2005. A robotic indenter for minimally invasive characterization of soft tissues. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, June, Berlin, vol. 128, pp. 1713-1718.
29. Sedef M., Samur E., and Basdogan C. Real-time finite-element simulation of linear viscoelastic tissue behavior based on experimental data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26 5 (2006) 58-68
30. Schnur D.S., and Zabaras N. An inverse method for determining elastic material properties and a material interface. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 33 (1991) 2039-2057
31. Tay, B.K., Stylopoulos, N., De, S., Rattner, D.W., Srinivisan, M.A., 2002. Measurement of in vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation. In: Proceedings of MMVR Conference, pp. 514-519.
32. Tönük E., and Silver-Thorn M.B. Nonlinear elastic material property estimation of lower extremity residual limb tissue. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 11 (2003) 43-53
33. Valtorta D., and Mazza E. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device. Medical Image Analysis 9 5 (2005) 481-490
34. Yong-Ping Z., and Mak A.F. An ultrasound indentation system for biomechanical properties assessment of soft tissues in vivo. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 43 (1996) 912-918