Effects of translational and gripping force feedback are decoupled in a 4-degree-of-freedom telemanipulator

Proceedings - Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 286-291

  Verner, Lawton N ^a   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FEEDBACK; FORCE CONTROL; HAPTIC INTERFACES;

DECOUPLED DYNAMICS; FORCE FEEDBACK; TELEMANIPULATOR;

REMOTE CONTROL;

EID: 34548118733     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2007.46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. F. Barbagli and K. Salisbury. The effect of sensor/actuator asymmetries in haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 140-147, 2003.
2. M. Cavusoglu, W. Williams, F. Tendick, and S. S. Sastry. Robotics for telesurgery: Second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications. Industrial Robot, 30(1):22-29, 2003.
3. T. Debus, J. Stoll, R. Howe, and P. Dupont. Cooperative human and machine perception in teleoperation assembly. In Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pages 51-60, 2000.
4. A. Dollar, C. Wagner, and R. Howe. Sensors for biomimetic robots via shape deposition manufacturing. In IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob2006), pages 763-768, 2006.
5. S. Kim, S. Hasegawa, Y. Koike, and M. Sato. Tension based 7-dof force feedback device: Spidar-g. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 283-284, 2002.
6. R. Murray, Z. Li, and S. Sastry. A mathematical Introduction to robotic manipulation. CRC Press, 1994.
7. J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, M. MacFarlane, and M. Sinanan. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery - experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46:1212-1221, 1999.
8. S. Saha. Appropriate degrees of freedom of force sensing in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, May 2006.
9. W. Semere, M. Kitagawa, and A. M. Okamura. Teleoperation with sensor/actuator asymmetry: Task performance with partial force feedback. In Proceedings of 12th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 121-127, 2004.
10. G. Tholey and J. P. Desai. A general purpose 7 dof haptic interface. In Proceedings of World Haptics Conference, pages 582-583, 2005.
11. L. N. Verner, K. Jeung, and A. M. Okamura. The effects of gripping and translational forces on teleoperation. In F. Barbagli, D. Prattichizzo, and K. Salisbury, editors, Multipoint Interaction with Real and Virtual Objects, volume 18 of Springer Tracks in Advanced Robotics, pages 231-242. Springer Verlag, 2005.
12. L. N. Verner and A. M. Okamura. Sensor/actuator asymmetries in telemanipulators: Implications of partial force feedback. In Proceedings of 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, pages 309-314, 2006.
13. C. Wagner and R. Howe. Mechanisms of performance enhancement with force feedback. In Proceedings of World Haptics Conference, pages 21-29, 2005.
14. R. L. Williams, II, J. M. Henry, and D. W. Repperger. Evaluation of rate-based force-reflecting teleoperation in free motion and contact. Presence, 9(1):25-36, 2000.