Predicting children's word-reading accuracy for common English words: The effect of word transparency and complexity

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 519-543

  Spencer, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; READING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; READING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77955073750     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712609X470752     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., et al. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. St Louis, MO: Washington University, Retrieved from elexicon.wustl.edu
5. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.
6. Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory and Cognition, 29(4), 639-647.
7. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.
8. Berndt, R. T., Reggia, J. A., & Mitchum, C. C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 1-9.
9. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 411-431.
10. Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & De Groot, A. M. (2005). Onset entropy matters - letter-tophoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing, 18, 211-229.
11. Calhoon, J. A., & Leslie, L. (2002). A longitudinal study of the effects of word frequency and rimeneighborhood size on beginning readers' rime reading accuracy in words and nonwords. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(1), 39-58.
12. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Coltheart, M. (2006). Dual route and connectionist models of reading: An overview. London Review of Education, 4, 5-17.
14. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589-608.
15. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
17. Compton, D. L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 219-259.
18. Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non-parallel processes? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 9-22.
19. Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Katz, L., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1-16.
20. Department of Education and Employment (2000). Progression in phonics. London: DOEE.
21. Duncan, L. C., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171-208.
22. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
24. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Ehri, L. C., & Soffer, A. G. (1999). Graphophonemic awareness: Development in elementary students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 1-30.
26. Ellis, N. C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., Van Daal, V. H. P., Polyzoe, N., et al. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 438-468.
27. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publication.
28. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301-330). London: Erlbaum.
29. Frith, U.,Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1), 31-54.
30. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
31. Gontijo, P. F. D., Gontijo, I., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Grapheme-phoneme probabilities in British English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35(1), 136-157.
32. Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
33. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443-475.
34. Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217-240.
35. Goswami, U. (2005). Synthetic phonics and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21(4), 273-282.
36. Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children's orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(3), 273-290.
37. Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., & Hodges, R. E. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, [OE-32008].
38. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 166-183.
39. Hofland, K., & Johansson, S. (1982). Word frequencies in British and American English. Bergen: The Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
40. Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273-296.
41. Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723-750.
42. Johnston, R. S., & Watson, J. E. (1997). Fast phonics first. Spalefield: Spalefield Publishing.
43. Johnston, R. S., & Watson, J. E. (2004). Accelerating the development of reading, spelling and phoneme awareness skills in initial readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 327-357.
44. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
45. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2007). Feedback consistency effects in single-word reading. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 159-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315-334.
47. Laxon, V., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too:Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103-119.
48. Laxon, V., Gallagher, A., & Masterson, J. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter length and graphemic complexity on children's reading accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 269-287. doi:10.1348/000712602162580.
49. Lete, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 952-977.
50. Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M., & Lovejoy, S. (2003). Children's Printed Word Database. Economic and Social Research Council project (R00023406). Retrieved from http://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/cpwd/
51. McGuinness, D. (1997). Why children can't read and what we can do about it. London: Penguin Books.
52. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 45-52.
53. NFER (2000). Group reading test 6-12. London: NFER-Nelson.
54. Oney, B., & Goldman, S. R. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 557-568.
55. Oxford University Press (2006). The Oxford English dictionary on-line. Oxford: Author. Retrieved from http://dictionary.oed.com/
56. Paulesu, E., Demonet, J.-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., et al. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165-2167.
57. Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91-96.
58. Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 33-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Perry, C. (2003). A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 392-397.
60. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP {thorn} model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
61. Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543-568.
62. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
63. Protopapas, A., & Vlahou, E. L. (2009). A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 991-1008.
64. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(2), 277-282.
65. Rey, A., Jacobs, A. M., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (1998). A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68, B71-B80.
66. Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudo-homophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 48-62.
67. Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C. (1998). Evaluating word-reading models at the item level: Matching the grain of theory and data. Psychological Science, 9(3), 234-237.
68. Seymour, P. H. K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 319-337). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Seymour, P. H. K. (1999). Cognitive architecture of early reading. In I. Lundberg, F. E. Tonnessen, & I. Austad (Eds.), Dyslexia: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 59-73). London: Kluwer.
70. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. doi:10.1348/ 000712603321661859.
71. Seymour, P. H. K., Bunce, F., & Evans, H. M (1992). A framework for orthographic remediation and assessment. In C. Sterling & C. Robson (Eds.), Psychology, spelling and education (pp. 224-247). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
72. Spencer, K. A. (1999). Predicting word-spelling difficulty in 7- to 11-year-olds. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(3), 283-292.
73. Spencer, K. A. (2001). Differential effects of orthographic transparency on dyslexia: Word reading difficulty for common English words. Dyslexia, 7, 217-228.
74. Spencer, K. A. (2006). Phonics self-teaching materials for foundation literacy. Literacy, 40, 42-50.
75. Spencer, K. A. (2007). Predicting children's word-spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 305-338. doi:10.1348/000712606X123002.
76. Spencer, K. A. (2009). Feed-forward, -backward and neutral transparency measures for British English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 220-227.
77. Spencer, K. A., Loizidou, N., & Masterson, J. (2010). Feed-forward, -backward and neutral transparency measures for grade 1 and grade 2 Greek readers. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 96-108.
78. Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1-28. doi:10.1348/000712603762842075.
79. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
80. Stanovich, K. E., & Bauer, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 6, 410-415.
81. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
82. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
83. Treiman, R. (1987). On the relationship between phonological awareness and literacy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 524-529.
84. Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
85. Venezky, R. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
86. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory and Cognition, 13, 557-572.
87. Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91-103.
88. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
89. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 504-515.
90. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600-618.