Evaluating Word-reading Models at the Item Level: Matching the Grain of Theory and Data

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 234-237

  Seidenberg, Mark S ^a   Plaut, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347718480     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00046     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Besner, D. (in press). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionisl models. In P.A. McMullen & R.M. Klein (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Besner, D., & Bourassa, D.C. (1995, June). Localist and parallel processing models of visual word recognition: A few more words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science Society, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
3. Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Phonological representations, reading, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Kawamoto, A.H., Kello, C., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (in press). Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
5. Kawamoto, A.H., & Zemblige, J.H. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
6. Plaut, D.C., & Kello, C.T. (in press). The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
8. Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & E.M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 199-252). New York: Academic Press.
9. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
10. Seidenberg, M.S., & Waters, G.S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study [Abstract]. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 489.
11. Spieler, D.H., & Balota, D.A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
12. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
13. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E.D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.