Synthetic phonics and learning to read: A cross-language perspective

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 273-282

  Goswami, Usha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055306378     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02667360500344823     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brown, G. D. A., and Deavers, R. P., 1999. Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73(3): 208–242.
2. Bruck, M., Genesee, F., and Caravolas, M., 1997. “ A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition ”. In Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention, Edited by: Blachman, B. A., 145–162. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
3. Chall, J. S., 1967. Learning to read: The great debate, New York: McGraw Hill.
4. Cook, M., ed. 2002. Perspectives on the teaching and learning of phonics, Royston, UK: United Kingdom Reading Association.
5. Durgunoglu, A. Y., and Oney, B., 1999. A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading & Writing, 11: 281–299.
6. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. A., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., and Shanahan, T., 2001. Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36: 250–287.
7. Ellis, N. C., and Hooper, A. M., 2001. Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22: 571–599.
8. Frith, U., Wimmer, H., and Landerl, K., 1998. Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1): 31–54.
9. Goswami, U., 1986. Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42: 73–83.
10. Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., and de Barrera, L. F., 1998. Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1): 19–52.
11. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., and Schneider, W., 2001. Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory & Language, 45(4): 648–664.
12. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., and Schneider, W., 2003. Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units?. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24: 235–247.
13. Hanley, R., Masterson, J., Spencer, L., and Evans, D., 2004. How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(8): 1393–1410.
14. Landerl, K., 2000. Influences of orthographic consistency and reading instruction on the development of nonword reading skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15: 239–257.
15. National Reading Panel. 2000. “ Teaching to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and it simplications for reading instruction ”. Washington, DC: NICHD Clearing House. (http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm)
16. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., and Seidenberg, M. S., 2001. How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2: 31–74.
17. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., and Erskine, J. M., 2003. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94: 143–174.
18. Share, D. L., 1995. Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2): 151–218.
19. Siok, W. T., and Fletcher, P., 2001. The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37: 886–899.
20. Spencer, L. H., and Hanley, J. R., 2003. Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1): 1–28.
21. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., and Richmond-Welty, E. D., 1995. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2): 107–136.
22. Walton, P. D., and Walton, L. M., 2002. Beginning reading by teaching in rime analogy: Effects on phonological skills, letter–sound knowledge, working memory and word-reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6: 79–115.
23. Walton, P. D., Bowden, M. E., Kurtz, S. L., and Angus, M., 2001a. Evaluation of a rime-based reading program with Shuswap and Heiltsuk first nations prereaders. Reading & Writing, 14: 229–264.
24. Walton, P. D., Walton, L. M., and Felton, K., 2001b. Teaching rime analogy or letter recoding reading strategies to pre-readers: Effects on prereading skills and word reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93: 160–180.
25. Ziegler, J. C., and Goswami, U., 2005. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1): 3–29.
26. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., and Jacobs, A. M., 1997. What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4): 600–618.