Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress

Assessing Writing

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 68-85

  Parr, Judy M ^a   Timperley, Helen S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Feedback; Formative writing assessment; Teacher knowledge; Writing achievement; Written response

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954456999     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ball A. Expanding the dialogue on culture as a critical component when assessing writing. Assessing Writing 1997, 4:169-202.
2. Ball D.L., Bass H. Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. Multiple perspectives on teaching and learning 2000, 83-104. Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT. J. Boaler (Ed.).
3. Balzer W.K., Doherty M.E., O'Connor R. Effects of cognitive feed-back on performance. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106(3):410-433.
4. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice 2003, Open University Press, Buckingham.
5. Black P., McCormick R., James M., Pedder D. Learning how to learn: Assessment for learning: A theoretical enquiry. Research Papers in Education 2006, 21:119-132.
6. Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 1998, 5:7-73.
7. Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2009, 21:5-31.
8. Borko H. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 2004, 33(8):3-15.
9. Brown G.T.L., Glasswell K., Harland D. Accuracy in scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing 2004, 9:105-121.
10. Brown G.T.L., Irving S.E., Sussex K. Scoring of a nationally representative sample of student writing at level 5-6 of the New Zealand English curriculum: Use and refinement of the asTTle progress indicators & tasks 2004, August, asTTle Tech. Rep. #48, University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
11. Chapman M. Situated, social, active: Rewriting genre in the elementary classroom. Written Communication 1999, 16:469-490.
12. Connors R.J., Lunsford A.A. Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication 1993, 44:200-223.
13. Cowie B., Bell B. A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education 1999, 6:101-116.
14. Derewianka B. Exploring how texts work 1990, Primary Teachers Association, Sydney, Australia.
15. Ferris D.R. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 1997, 31:315-339.
16. Fife J.M., O'Neill P. Moving beyond the written comment: Narrowing the gap between response practice and research. College Composition and Communication 2001, 53:300-321.
17. Gardner J. Assessment and learning: An introduction. Assessment and learning 2006, Sage Publications, London. J. Gardner (Ed.).
18. Gee J. An introduction to discourse analysis 1990, Routledge, New York.
19. Hall K., Burke W. Making formative assessment work: Effective practice in the primary classroom 2003, Open University Press, Buckingham.
20. Hargreaves E., McCallum B. Written feedback to children from teachers 1998, ESRC Project 'Teaching, Assessment and Feedback Strategies'. Project Paper No. 7, University of London, Institute of Education, London.
21. Harlen, W. (1998). Classroom assessment: A dimension of purposes and procedures. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the New Zealand association for research in education.
22. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77:81-112.
23. Hattie J.A.C., Brown G.T.L., Keegan P.J., Irving S.E., MacKay A.J., Pipi A.H., et al. Assessment tools for teaching and learning (asTTle) manual: Version 3 2004 2003, December, Learning Media, Wellington.
24. Hawe E., Dixon H., Watson E. Oral feedback in the context of written language. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 2008, 31:43-58.
25. Higgins R., Hartley P., Skelton A. Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 2001, 6:269-274.
26. Huot B. Re-articulating writing 2002, Utah State University Press, Logan, UT.
27. Hyland F. ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research 2000, 4:33-54.
28. Jones A., Moreland J. The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case-study of a whole-school approach. Curriculum Journal 2005, 2(16):193-206.
29. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1998, 7(3):67-72.
30. Knapp P., Watkins M. Context, text, grammar: Teaching the genres and grammar of school writing in infant and primary classrooms 1994, Text Productions, Sydney, Australia.
31. Knapp P., Watkins M. Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing 2005, University of NSW Press, Sydney, Australia.
32. Kress G. Genre as social process. The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing 1993, 22-37. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, PA. B. Cope, M. Kalantzis (Eds.).
33. Little J., Gearhart M., Curry M., Kafka J. Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan 2003, November, 185-192.
34. Maclellan E. Assessment for learning: The different perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2001, 26:307-318.
35. Marshall B. Goals or horizons - the conundrum of progression in English: Or a possible way of understanding formative assessment in English. The Curriculum Journal 2004, 15:101-113.
36. Marshall B., Drummond M.J. How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education 2006, 21:133-149.
37. Martin J.R., Christie F., Rothery J. Social processes in education. The place of genre in learning: Current debates 1987, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Australia. I. Reid (Ed.).
38. Matsumura L., Patthey-Chavez G., Valdes R., Garnier H. Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students' revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal 2002, 103:3-25.
39. Moats L. Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers 2000, Paul H. Brooks, Baltimore.
40. Moats L., Lyon R. Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics of Language Disorders 1996, 16:73-86.
41. Muncie J. Using written feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal 2000, 54(1):47-53.
42. Murphy S. A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?. Assessing Writing 2000, 7:79-90.
43. Nelson J. Reading classrooms as text: Exploring student writers' interpretive practices. College Composition and Communication 1995, 46:411-429.
44. Newton D.P., Newton L.D. Subject content knowledge and teacher talk in the primary classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education 2001, 24(3):369-379.
45. Nicol D.J., Macfarlane-Dick Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 2006, 31:199-218.
46. Parr J.M., Glasswell K., Aikman M. Supporting teacher learning and informed practice in writing through assessment tools for teaching and learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2007, 35:69-87.
47. Penny J., Johnson R.L., Gordon B. The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability: An empirical study of a holistic rubric. Assessing Writing 2000, 7(2):143-164.
48. Phelps L.W. Cyrano's nose: Variations on the theme of response. Assessing Writing 2000, 7:91-110.
49. Phelps G., Schilling S. Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. Elementary School Journal 2004, 105:31-49.
50. Ramaprasad A. On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science 1983, 28:4-13.
51. Richardson S. Students' conditioned response to teachers' response: Portfolio proponents, take note!. Assessing Writing 2000, 10:80-99.
52. Robinson V.M.J., Lai M. Practitioner research for education: A guide to improving classrooms and schools 2006, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
53. Sadler D.R. Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education 1987, 13:191-209.
54. Sadler R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 1989, 18:119-144.
55. Sadler R. Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education 1998, 5:77-84.
56. Schwartz M. Response to writing: A college-wide perspective. College English 1984, 46:55-62.
57. Shulman L. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 1986, 15:4-14.
58. Shulman L. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 1987, 57:1-22.
59. Shepard L.A. Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership. 2005, 63:66-70.
60. Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world 2005, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. C. Snow, P. Griffin, S. Burns (Eds.).
61. Sommers N. Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication 1982, 33:148-156.
62. Sperling M., Freedman S. A good girl writes like a good girl: Written response and clues to the teaching/learning process. Written Communication 1987, 4:343-369.
63. Stern L.A., Solomon A. Effective faculty feedback: The road less travelled. Assessing Writing 2006, 11:22-41.
64. Timperley H.S., Parr J.M. What is this lesson about? Instructional processes and student understandings in the writing classroom. The Curriculum Journal 2009, 20:43-60.
65. Torrance H., Pryor J. Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom 1998, Open University Press, Buckingham.
66. Torrance H., Pryor J. Developing formative assessment: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal 2001, 27:615-631.
67. Tunstall P., Gipps C. Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal 1996, 22:389-404.
68. Twiselton S. Seeing the wood for the trees: The National Literacy Strategy and Initial Teacher Education; pedagogical content knowledge and the structure of subjects. Cambridge Journal of Education 2000, 30(3):391-403.
69. Ward, J., Thomas, G., & Tagg, A. (2007). What do teachers know about fractions? Paper presented at National numeracy conference.
70. Webb M., Jones J. Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2009, 16:165-184.
71. Weigle S.C., Bildt H., Valsecchi M. Effects of task and rater background on the evaluation of ESL student writing: A pilot study. TESOL Quarterly 2003, 37:345-354.
72. Wiliam, D. (1998). The validity of teachers' assessments. Paper presented to the 22nd annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education.
73. Wiliam D., Thompson M. Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work?. The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning 2007, 53-82. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. C.A. Dyer (Ed.).
74. Wing Jan L. Write ways: Modelling writing forms 1991, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
75. Wong-Fillimore L., Snow K. What teachers need to know about language. What teachers need to know about language 2002, 7-54. Delta Systems Co., McHenry, IL. C.T. Adger, C.E. Snow, D. Christian (Eds.).
76. Wray, D., & Lewis, M. (1999). From learning to teaching: Towards a model of teaching literacy. Unpublished Report, England (ERIC Document Service No. ED 432 777).
77. Wyatt-Smith C., Castleton G., Freebody P., Cooksey R. Teachers' qualitative judgements: A matter of context and salience, Part 1. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 2003, 26:11-32.
78. Zellermayer M. The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science 1989, 18:145-165.