Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students' revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2002, Pages

  Matsumura, Lindsay Clare ^a   Patthey Chavez, G Genevieve ^a   Valdés, Rosa ^b   Garnier, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040668257     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Applebee, A. N. (1984). Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2. Applebee, A. N. (1999). Building a foundation for effective teaching and learning of English: A personal perspective on thirty years of research. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(4), 352-366.
3. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Mussis, I. V. S., Latham, A. S., & Gentile, C. A. (1994). NAEP 1992 writing report card. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office for the National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
4. Aschbacher, P. R. (1999). Developing indicators of classroom practice to monitor and support school reform (Center for the Study of Evaluation Technical Report No. 513). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Berninger, V. W., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process of writing development across life span. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 193-218.
7. California State Board of Education. (1999). Reading/language arts framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Developed by the California Development and Supplemental Materials Commission. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
8. Calkins, L. M. (1983). Lessons from a child. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Christie, F. (1989). Language development in education. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 152-198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Clare, L. (2000). Using teachers' assignments as an indicator of classroom practice (Center for the Study of Evaluation Technical Report No. 532). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
11. Clare, L., & Aschbacher, P. R. (2001). Exploring the technical quality of using assignments and student work as indicators of classroom practice. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 39-59.
12. Clare, L., Valdés, R., Pascal, J., & Steinberg, J. R. (2001). Teachers' assignments as indicators of instructional quality in elementary schools (Center for the Study of Evaluation Technical Report No. 545). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
13. Clare, L., Valdés, R., & Patthey-Chavez, G. G. (2000). Learning to write in urban elementary and middle schools: An investigation of teachers' written feedback on student compositions (Center for the Study of Evaluation Technical Report No. 526). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
14. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1994). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 249-256.
15. Connors, R. J. (2000). The erasure of the sentence. College Composition and Communication, 52(1), 96-128.
16. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
17. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
19. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
20. Dorris, M. (1992). Morning girl. New York: Hyperion Books for Children.
21. Dyson, A. H. (1989). Multiple worlds of child writers: Friends learning to write. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Dyson, A. H. (2000). On reframing children's words: The perils, promises, and pleasures of writing children. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 352-367.
23. Dyson, A. H. (2001). Donkey Kong in Little Bear country: A first grader's composing development in the media spotlight. Elementary School Journal, 101(4), 417-433.
24. Edelsky, C. (1986). Writing in a bilingual classroom: Habia una vez. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
27. Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
28. Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 35, 365-387.
29. Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Falmer.
30. Goldenberg C., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Changing teaching takes more than a one-shot workshop. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 69-72.
31. Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32. Gubern, M. M. (1999). Strategies for effective research on the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and Instruction, 2, 223-228.
33. Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2000). Writing in knowledge-building communities. Research in the Teaching of English, 34(3), 430-457.
34. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Higuchi, C. (1996). Improving student learning: High standards, standards-based curriculum, and standards-based assessment models. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
36. Kamberelis, G. (1995). Genre as institutionally informed social practice. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 115-171.
37. Kamberelis, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(4), 403-460.
38. Keppner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
39. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
40. Lensmire, T. (1994). When children write: Critical revisions of writing workshop. New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Los Angeles Unified School District. (1998). Los Angeles Unified School District student learning standards. Los Angeles: LAUSD.
42. Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy: Modelling context in educational linguistics. Sydney: University of Sydney.
43. McNiff, J., & Leader, D. (1995, April). In-career teacher education in Ireland: A new perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
44. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Report of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. Kutztown, PA: Author.
46. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Newmann, F. M., Lopez, G., & Bryk, A. S. (1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
48. Olson, M. W., & Raffeld, P. (1987). The effects of written comments on the quality of student compositions and the learning of content. Reading Psychology, 4, 273-293.
49. Orellana, M. F. (1995). Literacy as a gendered social practice: Tasks, texts, talk, and take-up. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 674-708.
50. Patthey-Chavez, G. G., & Clare, L. (1996). Task, talk, and text: The influence of instructional conversation on transitional bilingual writers. Written Communication, 13, 515-563.
51. Patthey-Chavez, G. G., & Ferris, D. R. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 51-90.
52. Resnick, L. B., & Hall, M. W. (1998). Learning organizations for sustainable educational reform. Daedalus, 127(4), 89-117.
53. Rotherty, J. (1989). Learning about language. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 199-256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Scarcella, R. (1996). Secondary education in California and second language research: Instructing ESL students in the 1990s. CATESOL Journal, 9(1), 129-151.
55. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56. Sharmat, M. W. (1980). Gila monsters meet you at the airport. New York: Macmillan.
57. Silverstein, S. (1964). The giving tree. New York: Harper & Row.
58. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1989). What works for students at risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 4-13.
59. Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27.
60. Sternglass, M. (1998). Time to know them. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Strickland, D. S., Bodino, A., Buchan, K., Jones, K. M., Nelson, A., & Rosen, M. (2001). Teaching writing in a time of reform. Elementary School Journal, 101(4), 385-397.
62. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
65. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
66. Wilder, L. I. (1975). Little house on the prairie. New York: Harper & Row.
67. Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (2000). Teaching science writing to first graders: Genre learning and recontextualization. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(1), 35-65.
68. Yagelski, R. P. (1995). The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(2), 216-238.
69. Yeh, S. S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(1), 49-83.
70. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-102.
71. Zellermayer, M. (1989). The study of teachers' written feedback to student writing: Changes in the theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science, 18, 145-165.