Cyrano's nose: Variations on the theme of response

Assessing Writing

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 91-110

  Phelps, Louise Wetherbee ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criticism; Reflective practice; Response; Student writing; Teaching as art

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347316331     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00018-0     Document Type: Letter

References (23)

1. Anson, C. M. (1999). Reflective reading: developing thoughtful ways to respond to student writing. In: C. R. Cooper, & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: the role of teachers' knowledge about text, learning, and culture (pp. 302-324). Urbana: NCTE.
2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
4. Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
5. Haswell, R. H. (1991). Gaining ground in college writing: tales of development and interpretation. Dallas: Southern Methodist Univ. Press.
6. Haswell, J., & Haswell, R. H. (1995). Gendership and the miswriting of students. College Composition and Communication, 46, 223-254.
7. Hester, M. (1977). Visual attention and sensibility. In: R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 135-169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Larson, R. (1995). Epilogue: writing assignments: how might they encourage learning? In: R. Straub, & R. F. Lunsford (Eds.), Twelve readers reading: responding to college student writing (pp. 375-385). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
9. North, S. M. (1987). The making of knowledge in composition: portrait of an emerging field. Upper Montclair: Boynton/Cook.
10. Phelps, L. W. (1979). What we know about teaching composition that we don't know we know. Freshman English News, 7, 15-18.
11. Phelps, L. W. (1980). Acts, texts, and the teaching context: their relations within a dramatistic philosophy of composition (Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University; Retitled Composition in a New Key) Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 6255.
12. Phelps, L. W. (1989). Images of student writing: the deep structure of teacher response. In: C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, and research (pp. 37-67). Urbana: NCTE.
13. Phelps, L. W. (1992, March). The problem of criticism in composition studies. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Cincinnati.
14. Phelps, L. W. (1998). Surprised by response: student, teacher, editor, reviewer. Journal of Advanced Composition, 18, 247-273.
15. Probst, R. E. (1989). Transactional theory and response to student writing. In: C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, and research. Urbana: NCTE.
16. Random House Dictionary (1967). Unabridged edition.
17. Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
18. Rostand, E. (1972). Cyrano de Bergerac. New York: Penguin Putnam.
19. Scholes, R. (1985). Textual power: literary theory and the teaching of english. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
21. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design of teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Straub, R., & Lunsford, R. F. (1995). Twelve readers reading: responding to college student writing. Cresskill: Hampton.
23. van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: the meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany: SUNY Press.