Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-48

  Phelps, Geoffrey ^a   Schilling, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044264915     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/428764     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
3. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
4. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
5. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
6. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3-14). Edmonton: Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group.
7. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematics knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
8. Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Brady, S., & Moats, L. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation (Opinion Paper 120). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
10. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report No. RR-043). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
12. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
13. Duke, N., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3d ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. I. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 759-788). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers' perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301-325.
16. Grossman, P. L. (1990). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 24-31.
17. Grossman, P. L. (1991). What are we talking about anyway? Subject-matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 245-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18. Hambleton, R., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage.
19. International Reading Association. (2000). Excellent reading teachers: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Reading Teacher, 54(2), 235-240.
20. Lampert, M. (1998). Studying teaching as a thinking practice. In J. Greeno & S. G. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices (pp. 53-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Learning First Alliance/American Federation of Teachers. (1998). Teaching reading IS rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance.
23. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247-271.
24. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Quiroga, T., Potter, N. S., & Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 69-87.
26. McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(4), 215-226.
27. McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., & Cox, S. (2002). Reading teachers' knowledge of children's literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 207-228.
28. Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1997). Bilog: Item analysis and test scoring with binary models. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
29. Moats, L. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81-102.
30. Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
31. Moats, L., & Lyon, R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics of Language Disorders, 16(2), 73-86.
32. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2001). Middle childhood generalist standards (2d ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
33. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: Reports of the sub-groups (Publication Report). Washington, DC: National Institute for Health and Child Development.
34. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. Reading Teacher, 39, 771-777.
35. Pearson, P. D. (1996). Six ideas in search of a champion: What policymakers should know about teaching and learning of literacy in our schools. Journal of Literacy Research, 28(2), 302-309.
36. Pearson, P. D. (2001). Learning to teach reading: The status of the knowledge base. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 4-19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
37. Phelps, G. (2003). Just knowing how to read isn't enough! What teachers know about the content of reading. Manuscript in preparation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
38. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-562). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 513-555.
40. Roller, C. M. (Ed.). (2001). Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41. Rowan, B., Schilling, S. G., Ball, D. L., & Miller, R. (2001). Measuring teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in surveys: An exploratory study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
42. Schilling, S. G. (2002). ORDFAC [software]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
43. Schilling, S. G., & Phelps, G. (2003). Dimensionality and local independence in measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. Manuscript in preparation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
44. Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 229-272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
46. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
47. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
48. Snow, C. E., Burns S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). "150 different ways of knowing": Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-123). Eastbourne: Cassell.
51. Wilson, S., & Wineburg, S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.
52. Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. M. (1991). The subject matter knowledge of history teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 305-345). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53. Wong-Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7-54). McHenry, IL: Delta Systems Co.