Research into teaching with whole-class interactive technologies: Emergent themes

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 285-292

  Littleton, Karen ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogic teaching; Multimodal resources; Training and professional development; Whole class interactive technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954431478     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491240     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alexander, R. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
2. Alexander, R. (2008). Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school, 131-150. London: Sage.
3. Beauchamp, G., Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and all that jazz: The contribution of musical metaphors to the analysis of classroom activity with interactive technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 143-157.
4. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2010). Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 159-172.
5. de Winter, J., Winterbottom, M., & Wilson, E. (2010). Developing a user guide to integrating new technologies in science teaching and learning: Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of their affordances. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 261-267.
6. Fernández-Cárdenas, J.M., & Silveyra-De La Garza, M.L. (2010). Disciplinary knowledge and gesturing in communicative events: A comparative study between lessons using interactive whiteboards and traditional whiteboards in Mexican schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 173-193.
7. Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Green, J.L., & Smith, D. (1983). Teaching and learning: A linguistic perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 352-391.
9. Hardman, F. (2008). Teachers' use of feedback in whole class and group-based talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (p. 285). London: Sage.
10. Harlow, A., Cowie, B., & Heazlewood, M. (2010). Keeping in touch with learning: The use of an interactive whiteboard in the junior school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 237-243.
11. Hennessy, S., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. Forthcoming. A dialogic inquiry approach to working with teachers in developing classroom dialogue. Teachers College Record.
12. Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2009, June). English now: The place of image and writing in pedagogy. Presented at the Research Into Teaching with Whole class Interactive Technologies (RITWIT) International Conference, Cambridge.
13. Jewitt, C., & Moss, G. (2009, June). Teachers' pedagogic use of the technological possibilities of interactive whiteboards in UK secondary schools. Presented at the Research Into Teaching with Whole class Interactive Technologies (RITWIT) International Conference, Cambridge.
14. Kennewell, S., & Higgins, S. (2007). Introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 207-212.
15. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73.
16. Lee, M. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and schooling: The context. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 133-141.
17. Lemke, J. (2001). The long and the short of it: Comments on multiple timescale studies of human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 17-26.
18. Littleton, K. (2009, June). Research into teaching with whole class interactive technologies. Presented at the Research Into Teaching with Whole class Interactive Technologies (RITWIT) International Conference, Cambridge.
19. Littleton, K., Twiner, A., & Gillen, J. (2010). Instruction as orchestration: Multimodal connection building with the interactive whiteboard. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2), 130-141.
20. Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 269-275.
21. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
22. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.
23. Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2010). Presentation or mediation: Is there a need for 'interactive whiteboard technology-proficient' teachers in secondary mathematics? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 253-259.
24. Sawyer, R.K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.
25. Twiner, A., Coffin, C., Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2010). Multimodality, orchestration and participation in the context of classroom use of the interactive whiteboard: A discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 211-223.
26. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
27. Wegerif, R. (2010). Dialogue and teaching thinking with technology: Opening, expanding and deepening the 'inter-face'. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction. London: Routledge.
28. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic enquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Wikan, G., Mølster, T., Faugli, B., & Hope, R. (2010). Digital multimodal texts and their role in project work: Opportunities and dilemmas. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 225-236.
30. Wright, D. (2010). Orchestrating the instruments: Integrating ICT in the secondary mathematics classroom through handheld technology networks. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 277-284.