Presentation or mediation: Is there a need for 'interactive whiteboard technology-proficient' teachers in secondary mathematics?

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 253-259

  Miller, Dave ^a   Glover, Derek ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interaction; Interactive whiteboard; Interactivity; Mathematics; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954432919     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491236     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Becta. (2005). Evidence on the progress of ICT in education. Coventry, UK: Becta.
2. Becta. (2008). Harnessing technology: The role of technology and its impact on education. Sheffield, UK: Becta.
3. Blanton, P. (2008). Using interactive whiteboard to enhance student learning. Physics Teacher, 46(3), 188-189.
4. Cleaves, A., & Toplis, R. (2008). Pre-service science teachers and ICT: Communities of practice? Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 203-213.
5. Cogill, J. (2003). The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: Effects on pedagogy. Research Bursary Reports. Coventry, UK: Becta. Retrieved from Teachernet website: http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES-0791-2003.pdf#page=54.
6. Cogill, J. (2009, June). How are primary teachers' pedagogy and practice affected by using an IWB? Paper presented at the International Conference on Research Into Teaching with Whole class Interactive Technologies (RITWIT), Cambridge.
7. Cuthell, J.P. (2004). Interactive whiteboards: New tools, new pedagogies, new learning? MirandaNet research. Retrieved from http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk.
8. Damcott, D., Landato, J., & Marsh, C. (2000). Report on the use of the SMART board interactive whiteboard in physical science. Research report. Retrieved from SMARTer Kids Foundation website: http://www.smarterkids.org.
9. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.
10. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001). Missioners, tentatives and luddites: Leadership challenges for school and classroom posed by the introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK. Paper presented at British Educational Management and Administra- tion Society Conference, September 4-6 at Newport Pagnell, UK.
11. Godwin, S., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Whole class technology for learning mathematics: The case of functions and graphs. Education, Communication & Information (ECI), 4(1), 131-152.
12. Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., McFarlane, A., et al. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers and Education, 48(1), 137-152.
13. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73.
14. Miller, D., Averis, D., Door, V., & Glover, D. (2005a). How can the use of an interactive whiteboard enhance the nature of teaching and learning in secondary mathematics and modern foreign languages? Report made to Becta. Retrieved from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/bursaries05/interactive_whiteboard.pdf.
15. Miller, D., Averis, D., Door, V., & Glover, D. (2005b). From technology to professional development: How can the use of an interactive whiteboard in initial teacher education change the nature of teaching and learning in secondary mathematics and modern languages? Report made to the Teacher Training Agency. London: Training and evelopment Agency for Schools. Retrieved from Teacher Training Resource Bank: http://www.ttrb.ac.uk/attachments/0d65acf3-488a-4fca-8536-918d6dafd694.pdf.
16. Miller, D.J., & Glover, D. (2006). Interactive whiteboard evaluation for the secondary national strategy: Developing the use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics. Final report for the Secondary National Strategy. Retrieved from Department for Education and Skills website: http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/keystage3/downloads/ma_iaw_eval_rpt.pdf.
17. Miller, D.J., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2008). Enabling enhanced mathematics teaching: Final report for the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics.Retrieved from Keele University website: http://www.keele.ac.uk/media/keeleuniversity/fachumsocsci/sclpppp/education/interactivewhiteboard/ncetmreport-1.pdf.
18. Office for Standards in Education. (2008). Mathematics: Understanding the score. London: HMSO.
19. Robison, S. (2000). Math classes for the 21st century. Media and Methods, 36(4), 10-11.
20. Schussler, D.L., Poole, I.R., Whitlock, T.W., & Evertson, C.M. (2007). Layers and links: Learning to juggle 'one more thing' in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 572-583.
21. Simpson, M., Payne, F., Munro, R., & Lynch, E. (1998). Using information and communica- tion technology as a pedagogical tool: A survey of initial teacher education in Scotland. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7(3), 431-446.
22. Slay, H., Sieborger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just 'lipstick'? Computers and Education, 51(3), 1321-1341.
23. Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, 91-101.
24. Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2007). Using video-stimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 16, 321-335.
25. Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96.