Multimodality, orchestration and participation in the context of classroom use of the interactive whiteboard: A discussion

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 211-223

  Twiner, Alison ^a   Coffin, Caroline ^a   Littleton, Karen ^a   Whitelock, Denise ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interactive whiteboard; Multimodality; Orchestration; Participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954448886     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491232     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York: Dialogos.
2. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.
3. Bearne, E. (2003, November). Rethinking literacy: Communication, representation and text. Reading, Literacy and Language, 98-103.
4. Bearne, E. (2005). Interview with Gunther Kress. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 287-299.
5. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of post-modernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12.
6. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1553-1568.
7. De Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2004). Paying attention to attention: New economies for learning. Educational Theory, 54(4), 381-397.
8. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2007). Multimodal - ICT - Digital texts. Retrieved from http://www.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/primaryframework/library/Literacy/publications.
9. Faux, F. (2005). Multimodality: How students with special educational needs create multimedia stories. Education, Communication & Information, 5(2), 167-181.
10. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
11. Gillen, J., Littleton, K., Twiner, A., Kleine Staarman, J., & Mercer, N. (2008). Using the inter- active whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 348-358.
12. Haldane, M. (2007). Interactivity and the digital whiteboard: Weaving the fabric of learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 257-270.
13. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive white-boards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
14. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005-2007). T-MEDIA. Exploring teacher mediation of subject learning with ICT: A multimedia approach. Economic and Social Research Council-funded project: RES-000-23-0825. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
15. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.
16. Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., la Velle, L., et al. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers and Education, 48(1), 137-152.
17. Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, 'reading', and 'writing' for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331.
18. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge
19. Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
20. Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers' design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 303-317.
21. Johnson, D., & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 5-14.
22. Kemeny, H. (2005, June). Transforming learning? Interactive whiteboards in the primary classroom: Case studies from a London school. Paper presented at CRPP Transforming Pedagogy Conference, Singapore.
23. Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
24. Kress, G. (2000). A curriculum for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 133-145.
25. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
26. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Littleton, K., Twiner, A., & Gillen, J. (2010). Instruction as orchestration: Multimodal connection building with the interactive whiteboard. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2), 130-141.
28. Maybin, J. (2006). Children's voices: Talk, knowledge and identity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
30. Merchant, G. (2007). Writing the future in the digital age. Literacy, 41(3), 118-128.
31. Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: The experience of five elementary schools in an English education authority. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 5-19.
32. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33. Schwartz, A., & Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2006). Understanding the manga hype: Uncovering the multimodality of comic-book literacies. International Reading Association, 50(1), 40-49.
34. Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexi-bly adaptive instructional designs. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (vol. 2, pp. 183-213). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Scott, P. (2008). Talking a way to understanding in science classrooms. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 17-36). London: Sage.
36. Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
37. Walker, D. (2002, November 1). Meet Whiteboard Wendy. Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved from http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=371268.
38. Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupils' learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55(1), 350-362.
39. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.