Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the english as a foreign language classroom

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 159-172

  Schmid, Euline Cutrim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interactive whiteboard; Language teaching; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954444112     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491218     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aldrich, F., Rogers, Y., & Scaife, M. (1998). Getting to grips with 'interactivity': Helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 321-332.
2. Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers and Education, 54(3), 759-766.
3. Borg, S. (1999). Teachers' theories in grammar teaching. ELT Journal, 53(3), 157-167.
4. Borg, S. (2003). Review article: Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
5. Borg, S. (2009). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
6. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1553-1568.
7. Cutrim Schmid, E. (2009). The pedagogical potential of interactive whiteboards 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), The handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 491-505). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
8. Dudeney, G. (2006, Summer). Interactive, quite bored. IATEFL CALL Review, 8-10.
9. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
10. Gray, G., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R., & Tomkins, S. (2005). The pros and cons of interactive whiteboards in relation to the Key Stage 3 strategies and framework. Language Learning Journal, 32, 38-44.
11. Gray, G., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R., & Tomkins, S. (2007). Integrating ICT into classroom practice in modern foreign language teaching in England: Making room for teachers' voices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 407-429.
12. Johnson, K.E. (1992). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for nonnative speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(1), 83-108.
13. Legutke, M., & Thomas, H. (1991). Process and experience in the language classroom. Harlow, UK: Longman.
14. Mcniff, J., & Whitehead, J.A. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage Publications.
15. Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker, S., Tseng, C., & You, J. (2006). Expert-novice teacher mentoring in language learning technology. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Research in CALL teacher education (pp. 283-298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Orr, M. (2008). Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. CALL-EJ Online, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/callejonline/journal/9-2/orr.html.
17. Pearson, R. (2006, June). Teachers and new technology: Interactive whiteboards at British Council Hong Kong. Paper presented at the Computer Assisted Language Learning conference, Beijing, China.
18. Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.
19. Thornbury, S. (2009, June 7). On interactive whiteboards (again!). [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from British Council website: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/scott-thornbury/interactive-whiteboards-again.
20. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of the higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
21. Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Warschauer, M. (2000). On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Williams, L., & Chang, T. (2009, June). Combining IWB and video-conferencing equipment to support the teaching of English in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International Confer- ence on Research Into Teaching with Whole class Interactive Technologies (RITWIT), Cambridge, UK.
25. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman Addison- Wesley.
26. Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.