Semantic ambiguity within and across languages: An integrative review

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1266-1303

  Degani, Tamar ^a   Tokowicz, Natasha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Interlingual homographs; Semantic ambiguity

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REVIEW; SEMANTICS;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MULTILINGUALISM; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77954150386     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903377372     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Altarriba, J., Carlo, M. S., & Kroll, J. F. (1992, March). Language dominance and the processing of crosslanguage ambiguity. Poster presented at the Fifth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
2. Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. L. (2003). Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50, 159-170.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451-474.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). Retrieval of information from long-term memory. Science, 220, 25-30.
5. Andrews, S., & Bond, R. (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing, 22, 687-711.
6. Arêas Da Luz Fontes, A. B., & Schwartz, A. (in press). On a different plane: Cross-language effects on the conceptual representations of within-language homonyms. Language and Cognitive Processes.
7. Armstrong, B. C., & Plaut, D. C. (2008, July). Settling dynamics in distributed networks explain task differences in semantic ambiguity effects: Computational and behavioral evidence. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (Ed.). (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
9. Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 658-672.
10. Binder, K. S. (2003). Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye movement examination. Memory and Cognition, 31, 690-702.
11. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85.
12. Costa, A. (2005). Lexical access in bilingual production. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 308-325). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastiaán-Galleás, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283-1296.
14. de Bruijn, E. R. A., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., & Schriefers, H. J. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 155-168.
15. Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N. (in press). Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
16. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2009).Ambiguouswords are harder to learn. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
17. de Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001-1018.
18. de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 397-428.
19. Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 179-201). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Dijkstra, T., de Bruijn, E., Schriefers, H., & ten Brinke, S. (2000a). More on interlingual homograph recognition: Language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 69-78.
21. Dijkstra, T., del Prado Martín, M., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2005). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 7-41.
22. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518.
23. Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schriefers, H. (2000b). On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 445-464.
24. Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G. (2003). Testing the language mode hypothesis using trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6, 2-16.
25. Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197.
27. Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
28. Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D.S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives of resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 27-43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-446.
30. Dufour, R., & Kroll, J. F. (1995). Matching words to concepts in two languages: A test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory & Cognition, 23, 166-180.
31. Duyck, W., & De Houwer, J. (2008). Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 961-966.
32. Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008). The frequency effect in secondlanguage visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 850-855.
33. Duyck, W., & Warlop, N. (2009). Translation primin gbetween the native language and a second language. Experimental Psychology, 56, 173-179.
34. Elston-Güttler, K. E. (2000). An enquiry into crosslanguag edifferences in lexical-conceptual relationship sand their effects on L2 lexical processing, Unpublishe ddoctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
35. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sententia lcontext. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 256-283.
36. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Ambiguous words in sentences: Brain indices for native and non-native disambiguation. Neuroscienc eLetters, 414, 85-89.
37. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2005a). Zooming into L2: Global languag econtext and adjustment affect processing of interlingua lhomographs in sentences. Cognitive Brai nResearch, 25, 57-70.
38. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2005b). Who's in control?: Proficiency and L1 influenc eon L2 processing. Journal of Cognitiv eNeuroscience, 17, 1593-1610.
39. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Williams, J. N. (2008). Firs tlanguage polysemy affects second languag emeaning interpretation: Evidence for activation o ffirst language concepts during second languag ereading. Second Language Research, 24, 167-187.
40. Faust, M., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Sentence context an dlexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 36, 827-835.
41. Finkbeiner, M., Forster, K. I., Nicol, J., & Nakamura, K. (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic an dtranslation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 1-22.
42. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Prince, P. (1997). Secon dlanguage autonomy. Journal of Memory an dLanguage, 37, 481-501.
43. Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Languagespecifi clexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 305-315.
44. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanis mof suppression: A component of general comprehensio nskill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
45. Gernsbacher, M. A., & St. John, M. F. (2001). Modeling suppression in lexical access. In D.S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 47-65). Washington, DC: America nPsychological Association.
46. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehensio nskill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430-445.
47. Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I., & Frost, R. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Maske dpriming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew - English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1122-1139.
48. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingua llexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language an dCognition, 1, 67-81.
49. Greenberg, S. N., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2004). Lette rdetection for homographs with different meaning sin different language texts. Bilingualism: Languag eand Cognition, 7, 241-253.
50. Greenberg, S. N., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2008). Interlingua lhomograph letter detection in mixe dlanguage text: Persistent missing-letter effects an dthe effect of language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 111-119.
51. Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution a srevealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 643-657.
52. Haigh, C. A., & Jared, D. (2007). The activation o fphonological representations by bilinguals whil ereading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 623-644.
53. Hart, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Learning words in Zekkish: Implications for understanding lexica lrepresentation. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naple s(Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biologica lperspectives (pp. 107-128). New York: Taylor & Francis.
54. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., de Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their firs tlanguage? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 213-229.
55. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy i nlexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexica laccess accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
56. Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semanti ctasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal o fMemory and Language, 55, 247-273.
57. Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexica lambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal o fVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265-274.
58. Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological activatio nin bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograp hnaming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 225-239.
59. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discret eserial versus cascaded processing in lexical access i nspeech production: Further evidence from the coactivatio nof near-synonyms. Journal of Experimenta lPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274.
60. Kawamoto, A. H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in th eresolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distribute dprocessing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
61. Kerkhofs, R., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2006). Testing a model for bilingual semanti cpriming with interlingual homographs: RT an dN400 effects. Brain Research, 1068, 170-183.
62. Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representatio nof polysemous words. Journal of Memory an dLanguage, 45, 259-282.
63. Klepousniotou, E., Titone, D., & Romero, C. (2008). Making sense of word senses: The comprehensio nof polysemy depends on sense overlap. Journal o fExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, an dCognition, 34, 1534-1543.
64. Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selectio nin bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language an dCognition, 9, 119-135.
65. Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1997). Lexical an dconceptual memory in the bilingual: Mapping for mto meaning in two languages. In A. M. B. d eGroot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 169-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interferenc ein translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetri cconnections between bilingual memor yrepresentations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.
67. Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of bilingua lrepresentation and processing: Looking back and t othe future. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groo t(Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguisti capproaches (pp. 531-553). New York: Oxfor dUniversity Press.
68. Lemhoü fer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizin gcognates and interlingual homographs: Effects o fcode similarity in language-specific and generalize dlexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 32, 533-550.
69. Lemhoü fer, K., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognitio nin a second language: A mega-study. Journal o fExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, an dCognition, 34, 12-31.
70. Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexica laccess in context: Evidence from eye-movemen tduring reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 381-390.
71. Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activatio nin bilingual language processing: Within- an dbetween-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97-115.
72. Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). The effect sof context, meaning frequency, and associativ estrength on semantic selection: Distinct contribution sfrom each cerebral hemisphere. Brai nResearch, 1183, 91-108.
73. Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). The divide dvisual world paradigm: Eye tracking reveals hemispheri casymmetries in lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain Research, 1222, 166-183.
74. Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution o flexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretation sin neutral contexts. Journal of Memory an dLanguage, 33, 175-202.
75. Nakayama, M., & Archibald, J. (2005, May). Eyetracking and interlingual homographs. Paper presente dat the Annual Conference of the Canadia nLinguistic Association, London, Ontario.
76. Nievas, F., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2002). Negative primin gfrom the non-selected meaning of the homograph. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 47-66.
77. Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexica lambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effect sof frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memor yand Cognition, 9, 225-236.
78. Paulmann, S., Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Is bilingual lexical access influence dby language context? NeuroReport, 17, 727-731.
79. Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2008). Hemispheric sensitivitie sto lexical and contextual information: Evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution. Brai nand Language, 105, 71-82.
80. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical qualit yhypothesis. In L. T. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literac y(pp. 189-213). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Joh nBenjamins.
81. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selectio nand phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journa lof Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, an dCognition, 24, 539-557.
82. Piercey, C. D., & Joordens, S. (2000). Turning a nadvantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects i nlexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory an dCognition, 28, 657-666.
83. Prior, A., MacWhinney, B., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Translation norms for English and Spanish: Th erole of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficienc yin negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 1029-1038.
84. Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effect sof prior encounter and global discourse bias on th eprocessing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidenc efrom eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 527-544.
85. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competitio nin lexical access. Journal of Memory an dLanguage, 46, 245-266.
86. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Meyer, D. E., & Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, an dvisual word recognition. Journal of Experimenta lPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 243-256.
87. Schwartz, A. I. (2003). The nature of cross-languag elexical activation in sentence context: A psycholinguisti cinvestigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Th ePennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
88. Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexica lactivation in sentence context. Journal of Memor yand Language, 55, 197-212.
89. Schwartz, A. I., Yeh, L. H., & Arêas Da Luz Fontes, A. B. (2009). Bilingual lexical disambiguation in context: The role of non-selective cross-language activation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
90. Schwartz, A. I., Yeh, L. H., & Shaw, M. P. (2008). Lexical representation of second language words: Implications for second language vocabular yacquisition and use. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 309-324.
91. Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance an dsemantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120-136.
92. Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role i nmodels of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316-340.
93. Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation an dselection processes in the recognition of ambiguou swords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Huma nPerception and Performance, 11, 28-39.
94. Smits, E., Martensen, H., Dijkstra, T., & Sandra, D. (2006). Naming interlingual homographs: Variabl ecompetition and the role of the decision system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 281-297.
95. Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First languag eactivation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatica lclass. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 387-422.
96. Tabossi, P., & Sbisá, S. (2001). Methodological issues i nthe study of lexical ambiguity resolution. In D.S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meanin gselection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguit y(pp. 11-26). Washington, DC: America nPsychological Association.
97. Tabossi, P., & Zardon, F. (1993). Processing ambiguou swords in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 359-372.
98. Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F., & Dufour, R. (1999). Fro mform to meaning: Stages in the acquisition o fsecond-language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Languag eand Cognition, 2, 45-58.
99. Tokowicz, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Number of meaning sand concreteness: Consequences of ambiguit ywithin and across languages. Language an dCognitive Processes, 22, 727-779.
100. Tokowicz, N., Kroll, J. F., de Groot, A. M. B., & van Hell, J. G. (2002). Number-of-translation norms for Dutch-English translation pairs: A new tool for examining language production. Behavior Researc hMethods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 435-451.
101. Tokowicz, N., Prior, A., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). Bilingua lspeech production depends on translation ambiguity, Manuscript in preparation.
102. Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, T. (2009). Are pumpkin sbetter than heaven? An ERP investigation o forder effects in the concrete-word advantage. Brai nand Language, 110, 12-22.
103. van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism chang enative-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentenc econtext. Psychological Science, 20, 923-927.
104. van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign languag eknowledge can influence native languag eperformance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780-789.
105. van Hell, J.G., & Witteman, M. J. (2009).The neurocognitio nof switching between languages:Areview of electrophysiologica lstudies. In L. Isurin, D. Winford, & K. de Bot (Eds.), Multidiscipilinary approaches to cod eswitching (pp. 53-84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
106. van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual wor drecognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.
107. van Heuven, W. J. B., Schriefers, H., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Language conflict in th ebilingual brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2706-2716.
108. van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous word sin context: An event-related potential analysis of th etime course of meaning activation. Journal of Memor yand Language, 26, 188-208.
109. von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (2002). Interlingua lhomograph interference in German-Englis hbilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 1-23.