Lexical Ambiguity Resolution Across Languages: A Theoretical and Empirical Review

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 159-170

  Altarriba, Jeanette ^a   Gianico, Jennifer L ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilingual language processing; Homographs; Lexical ambiguity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SEMANTICS;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MULTILINGUALISM; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0041850106     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.159     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Altarriba, J., Carlo, M. S., & Kroll, J. F. (1992, March). Language dominance and the processing of cross-language ambiguity. Poster presented at the Fifth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
2. Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. L. (2002). The use of sentence contexts in reading, memory and semantic disambiguation. In R. R. Heredia, & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 111-135). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
3. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24, 477-492.
4. Ashcraft, M. H. (1994). Human memory and cognition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
5. Beauvillain, C. (1992). Orthographic and lexical constraints in bilingual word recognition. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 221-235). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
6. Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 658-672.
7. Binder, K., & Rayner, K. (1998). Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye-fixations and self-paced reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 271-276.
8. Bueno, S., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). The frequency effect during the processing of interlexical homographs. Psychologie Francaise, 43, 339-348.
9. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilinguals' two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365-397.
10. Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
11. De Bruijn, E. R. A., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., & Schriefers, H. J. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 155-168.
12. de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 397-428.
13. de Groot, A. M. B., & Nas, G. L.J (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 90-123.
14. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518.
15. Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
16. Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schriefers, H. (2000). On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 445-464.
17. Ferraro, F. R., & Kellas, G. (1990). Normative data for number of word meanings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 491-498.
18. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119-148.
19. Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 305-315.
20. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N. J., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
21. Gilboy, E., Sopena, J. M., Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition, 54, 131-167.
22. Gorfein, D. S. (Ed.) (1989). Resolving semantic ambiguity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Gorfein, D. S. (Ed.) (2001). On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Gorfein, D. S., Berger, S., & Bubka, A. (2000). The selection of homograph meaning: Word association when context changes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 766-773.
25. Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 520-530.
26. Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265-274.
27. Holmes, V. M. (1979). Accessing ambiguous words during sentence comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 569-589.
28. Kintsch, W., & Mross, E. F. (1985). Context effects in word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 336-349.
29. Kolers, P. A. (1963). Interlingual word associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 291-300.
30. Kolers, P. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 314-319.
31. Lucas, M. M. (1987). Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence contexts. Language and Speech, 30, 25-46.
32. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
33. Martin, C., Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Metcalf, K. (1999). Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 813-839.
34. Mitchell, D. C., & Cuetos, F. (1991). The origins of parsing strategies. In C. Smith (Ed.), Current issues in language processing (pp. 1-12). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
35. Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 175-202.
36. Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency and contextual bias. Memory & Cognition, 9, 225-236.
37. Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 779-790.
38. Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1984). Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Language and Verbal Behavior, 23, 84-99.
39. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Meyer, D. E., & Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 243-256.
40. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232-252.
41. Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489-537.
42. Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120-136.
43. Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316-340.
44. Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28-39.
45. Simpson, G. B., & Krueger, M. A. (1991). Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627-643.
46. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.
47. Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324-340.
48. Tabossi, P., & Sbisa, S. (2001). Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 11-26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49. Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427-440.
50. Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. C., & Gil, M. (1999). Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1347-1365.
51. Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Towards a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tulving, E., & Colotla, V. A. (1970). Free recall of trilingual lists. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 86-98.
53. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 188-208.
54. Williams, J. N., & Colombo, L. (1995). Constraints on the range of context-independent priming from ambiguous words. Psychological Research, 58, 38-50.
55. Yates, J. (1978). Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words. Memory & Cognition, 6, 636-643.