Commonly taught and less commonly taught language learners: Are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning?

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 199-219

  Winke, Paula ^a   Goertler, Senta ^a   Amuzie, Grace L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; CALL; Computer literacy; Distance learning; Hybrid instruction; Individual differences; Less commonly taught languages

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953308324     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2010.486576     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arnone, M. (2002). 3 Iowa universities go online to preserve Eastern European language courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(45), A31.
2. Banados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3),533-550.
3. Barone, C.A., & Hagner, P.R. (Eds.). (2001). Technology enhanced teaching and learning: Leading and supporting the transformation on your campus. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Barrette, C.M. (2001). Students' preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19(1),5-36.
5. Blake, R. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497-511.
6. Blake, R. (2008). Distance learning for second and foreign language teaching. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 4, pp. 365-376). New York: Springer.
7. Blake,R.,& Delforge, A.(2007).Online language learning: Thecase of Spanish without Walls. In B.A. Lafford & R. Salaberry (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 127-147). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Blake, R., Wilson, N.L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114-127.
9. Burston, J.L. (1991). Using systeme-d in a classroom environment. CALICO Journal, 8(4), 51-57.
10. Burston, J.L. (2001). Exploiting the potential of a computer-based grammar checker in conjunction with self-monitoring strategies with advanced-level students of French. CALICO Journal, 18(3), 499-516.
11. Chapelle, C.A. (2005). Computer assisted language learning. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 743-756). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Chenoweth, N.A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 285-314.
13. Chenoweth, N.A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of Language Online. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 115-145.
14. Davies, G. (2009). ICT "can do" lists for teachers of foreign languages. Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, UK: Thames Valley University. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/ICT_Can_ Do_Lists.doc
15. Donaldson, R.P., & Haggstrom, M.A. (2006). Changing language education through CALL. New York: Routledge.
16. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3),429-456.
17. Fischer, K. (2008). New report reveals mixed results in colleges' efforts at international education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(38), A.24.
18. Fleming, S., Hiple, D., & Du, Y. (2002). Foreign language distance education: The University of Hawaii's experience. In C.A. Spreen & M. Levy (Eds.), WORLDCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 229-248). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
19. Furman, N., Goldberg, D., & Lusin, N. (2007). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, fall 2006. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from the Modern Language Association website: http://www.mla.org/pdf/enrollment survey_final.pdf
20. Goertler, S., & Winke, P. (2008). The effectiveness of technology-enhanced foreign language teaching. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 233-260). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
21. Hoven, D. (2006). Communicating and interacting: An exploration of the changing roles of media in CALL/CMC. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 233-256.
22. Howard, J. (2007). Enrollments in foreign-language courses continue to rise, MLA survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(13), A13.
23. Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos & C.M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hubbard, P.(2005).A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. CALL, 18(5), 351-368.
25. Johnson, E.M., & Brine, J.W. (2000). Design and development of CALL courses in Japan. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 251-268.
26. Kabata, K., & Wiebe, G. (2005). Challenge of developing and implementing multimedia courseware for a Japanese language program. CALICO Journal, 22(2), 237-250.
27. Kornum, L. (1993). Foreign language teaching and learning in a multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 10(3), 65-76.
28. Kraemer, A. (2008). Formats of distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 11-42). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
29. Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners' perspectives. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 139-156.
30. Levy, M. (2007). Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance. In R.P. Donaldson & M.A. Haggstrom (Eds.), Changing language education through CALL (pp. 1-18). New York: Routledge.
31. Liou, H.-C. (1997). Research of on-line help as learner strategies for multimedia CALL evaluation. CALICO Journal, 14(2-4), 81-96.
32. Messineo, M., & DeOllos, I.Y. (2005). Are we assuming too much? Exploring students' perception of their computer competence. College Teaching, 53(2), 50-55.
33. Murday, K., Ushida, D., & Chenoweth, N.A. (2008). Learners' and teachers' perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 125-142.
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Fast facts about postsecondary enrollment. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98
35. O'Bryan, A. (2008). Providing pedagogical learner training in CALL: Impact on student use of language learning strategies and glosses. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 142-159.
36. Romeo, K., & Hubbard, P. (2008). Pervasive CALL learner training for improving listening proficiency. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from the World CALL Proceedings website: http://www.j-let.org/~wcf/proceedings/d-060.pdf
37. Sanchez-Serrano, L. (2008). Initiation by fire: Training teachers for distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 153-174). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
38. Sanders, R.F. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4),523-532.
39. Scida, E.E., & Saury, R.E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3),517-531.
40. Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 81-102.
41. Trzesniewski, K.H., Donnellan, M.B., & Robins, R.W. (2008). Do today's young people really think they are so extraordinary? An examination of secular trends in narcissism and self- enhancement. Psychological Science, 19(2), 181-188.
42. Volle, L.M. (2005). Analyzing oral skills in voice-email and online interviews. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 146-163.
43. Warschauer, M. (1997). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2-3), 7-26.
44. Winke, P.M., & Goertler, S. (2008a). An introduction to distance language learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 1-10). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
45. Winke, P.M., & Goertler, S. (2008b). Did we forget someone? Students' computer access and literacy for CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 482-509.
46. Zyzik, E.C., & Polio, C. (2008). Incidental focus on form in Spanish literature courses. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 50-73.