Computer-assisted language learning

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 743-755

  Chapelle, Carol A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750336874     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-55     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Allum, P. (2002). CALL in the classroom: The case for comparative research. ReCALL Journal, 14(1), 146-166.
2. Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2), 213-231.
3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad S., & E. Finegan (1999). The longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
4. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
5. Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 61-75.
6. Bowers, C. A. (2000). Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and prospects of ecological sustainability. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Bruce, B. C. & Hogan, M. P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Burns, A., & Coffin, C. (Eds.), (2001). Analyzing English in a global context. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10. Chanier, T., Pengelly, M., Twidale, M., & Self, J. (1992). Conceptual modelling in error analysis in computer-assisted language learning systems. In M. L. Swartz & M. Yazdani (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems for foreign language learning, (pp. 125-150). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on teaching and research in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 22-34.
14. Chapelle, C. A. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research agendas? Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
15. Chapelle, C. (1994). CALL activities: Are they all the same? System, 22(1), 33-45.
16. Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33,343-377.
17. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80,183-198.
18. st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 548-560.
19. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Cummins, J. (2000). Academic language learning, transformative pedagogy and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 537-548.
21. DeRidder, I. (2002). Electronic glosses revisited. In J. Colpaert, W. Decoo, M. Simons, & S. Van Bueren (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international CALL conference: CALL Conference 2002-CALL professionals and the future of CALL research, (pp. 65-76). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
22. Desmarais, L., Duquette, L., Renie, D., & Laurier, M. (1998). Evaluating learning interactions in a multimedia environment. Computers and the Humanities, 22,1-23.
23. Doughty, C., (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
24. Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2002). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Paper presented at the Distance Learning of the Less Commonly Taught Languages Conference, Arlington, Virginia, February 1-3.
25. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, (pp. 197-261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Graddol, D. (2001). English in the future. In A. Burns & C. Coffin, (Eds.), Analyzing English in a global context, (pp. 260-37). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Harrington, M., & Levy, M. (2001). CALL begins with a –C—: Interaction in computer-mediated language learning. System, 29(1), 15-26.
30. Hegelheimer, V. (1998). Effects of textual glosses and sentence-level audio glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary recall. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Illinois.
31. Hegelheimer, V., & Chapelle, C. A. (2000). Methodological issues in research on learner-computer interactions in CALL. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 41-59.
32. Hsu, J. (1994). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL): The effect ofESL students' use of interactional modifications on listening comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, Iowa State University.
33. Jamieson, J., & Chapelle, C. (1987). Working styles on computers as evidence of second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 37, 523-544.
34. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2000). Looking to the future of TESOL teacher education: Web-based bulletin board discussions in a methods course. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 423-455.
35. Kon, C. K. (2002). The influence on outcomes of ESL students' performance strategies on a CALL listening comprehension activity. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of English, Iowa State University.
36. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.
37. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
38. Lamy, M-N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). Reflective conversation in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning and Technology, 2(2), 43-61
39. Levy, M. (2000). Scope, goals, and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. ReCALL, 12(2), 170-195.
40. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
41. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Murray, D. (2000). Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
43. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning and Technology, 3(1), 75-87.
44. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern, (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), pp. 48-72.
46. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527.
47. Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
48. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
49. Rassool, N. (1999). Literacy for sustainable development in the age of information. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
50. Renie, D. & Chanier, T. (1995). Collaboration and computer-assisted acquisition of a second language. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 8(1), 3-29.
51. Roever, C. (2001). Web-based language testing. Language Learning and Technology, 5(2), 84-94.
52. Rose, E. (2000). Hyper texts: The language and culture of educational computing. Toronto: The Althouse Press.
53. Salaberry, R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer-mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37.
54. Salaberry, R. (1999). CALL in the year 2000: Still developing the research agenda. A commentary on Carol Chapelle's ACALL in the Year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms. Language Learning and Technology, 3(1), 104-107.
55. Schmidt, R. (1992). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
56. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
57. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58. Susser, B. (2001). A defense of checklists for courseware evaluation. ReCALL Journal, 13(2), 261-276.
59. Swaffar, J. (1998). Assessing development in writing: A proposal for strategy coding. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens, (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and the L2 computer classroom, (pp. 155-176). Austin: Labyrinth Publications.
60. Taylor, C., Kirsch, I., Eignor, D., & Jamieson, J. (1999). Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks. Language Learning, 49(2), 219-274.
61. Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511-535.
62. Watanabe, Y. (1997), Input, intake and retention: effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign vocabulary, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287-307.
63. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1993). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 25, 297-308.