Learners' and teachers' perspectives on language online

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 125-142

  Murday, Kimmaree ^a   Ushida, Eiko ^b   Chenoweth, N Ann ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Chenoweth and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Computer assisted language instruction; Computer mediated communication; Learners' perspectives; Online courses; Online learning; Qualitative analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549099974     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220801943718     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through on online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550.
2. Burston, J. (2003). Proving IT works. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 219-226.
3. Chen, J., Belkada, S., & Okamoto, T. (2004). How a web-based course facilitates acquisition of English for academic purposes. Language learning & technology, 8(2), 33-49.
4. Carnevale, D. (2004). Educational technology fails to deliver on its promises, report says. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2004/06/2004062401n.htm.
5. Chenoweth, N.A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 285-314.
6. Chenoweth, N.A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of language online. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 115-145.
7. Corda, A., & Stel, M. (2004). Web-based CALL for Arabic: Constraints and challenges. CALICO Journal, 21(3), 485-496.
8. Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage publications.
9. Gilbert, S.D. (2001). How to be a successful online student. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Emerging technologies. Tools for distance education: Toward convergence and integration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 18-22.
11. Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66-82.
12. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100.
13. Meskill, C., Mossop, J., DiAngelo, S., & Pasquale, R.K. (2002). Expert and novice teachers talking technology: Precepts, concepts, and misconcepts. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 46-57.
14. Presby, L. (2001). Seven tips for highly effective online courses. Syllabus, 14(11), 17.
15. Sampson, N. (2003). Meeting the needs of distance learners. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 103-118.
16. Scida, E.E., & Saury, R.E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517-531.
17. Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 81-102.
18. Trotter, A. (2002). E-learning goes to school. Education Week, XXI(35), 16-18.
19. Warshauer, M. (1999). Electric literacies: Language, culture, and power in on-line education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Warshauer, M. (2000). On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warshauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Zemsky, R. & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why? A Final Report for The Weatherstation Project of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania in cooperation with the Thomson Corporation. Retrieved June 24, 2004, from http://www.irhe.upenn. edu/WeatherStation.html.
22. Zhang, H. (2002). Teaching business Chinese online. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 525-532.