Self-regulation and link selection strategies in hypertext

Discourse Processes

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 175-211

  Salmerón, Ladislao ^a   Kintsch, Walter ^b   Kintsch, Eileen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952790964     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530902728280     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 303-311.
2. Aiken, S., & West, G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545-561.
4. Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129-154.
5. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
7. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
8. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33,381-412.
9. Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent's external regulation upon college students' hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 67-87.
10. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.
11. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externallyfacilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72.
12. Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver lernhilfen auf den wissenserwerb in vernetzten lernumgebungen [Effects of metacognitive help on knowledge acquisition in Web-based learning environments]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 13-25.
13. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 359-375.
14. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition Learning, 3, 39-58.
15. Borkowski, J., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1987). Spontaneous strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
16. Britton, B. K., & Gülgöz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
17. Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 735-748.
18. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Exploring the online comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214-257.
20. Dearholt, D. W., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Properties of pathfinder networks. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 1-30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
22. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
24. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15,84-93.
25. Goldman, S. R. (1996). Reading, writing, and learning in hypermedia environments. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 7-42). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. (1990). Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 181-219.
27. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
28. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents' use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 125-148.
29. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 54-81). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
30. Jee, B., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. (2006). Expertise and the illusion of comprehension. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387-392). Available at: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/forms/cogsci.htm
31. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2005). Web-based training of metacognitive strategies for text comprehension: Focus on poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 29, 755-786.
32. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in Web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139-161.
33. Kintsch, E. (2005). Coomprehension theory as a guide to the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 51-64.
34. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
35. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385-399.
37. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest, and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51-70.
38. Levy, B. A., Campsall, J., Browne, J., Cooper, D., Waterhouse, C., & Wilson, C. (1995). Reading fluency: Episodic integration across texts. Journalof Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1169-1185.
39. Lightman, E. J., McCarthy, P. M., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The structural organization of high school educational texts. In D. Wilson & G. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 235-240). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
40. Lorch, R. F. (1993). Integration of topic and subordinate information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1071-1081.
41. Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A. (1993). College students' conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 239-252.
42. Madrid, R. I., van Oostendorp, H., & Puerta Melguizo, M. C. (2009). The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers and Human Behavior, 25, 66-75.
43. Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
44. McManus, T. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advanced organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11, 219-251.
45. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
46. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interaction of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-42.
47. McNamara, D. S., & O'Reilly, T. (in press). Theories of comprehension skill: Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Progress in experimental psychology research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
48. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2006). The role of goal structure in undergraduates' use of self regulatory processes in two hypermedia learning tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 49-86.
49. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1686-1706.
50. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy trainings in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 197-213.
51. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
52. O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2002). What's a science student to do? In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 726-731). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
53. Pelegrina, S., Bajo, M. T., & Justicia, F. (1999). Allocation of time in self-paced memory tasks: The role of practice, instructions, and individual differences in optimizing performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 401-429.
54. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
55. Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1987). The use of retrospective verbal reports in the analysis of compensatory strategies. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 213-299). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
56. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. (1995). Cognition, teaching, and assessment. New York: Harper-Collins.
57. Protopsaltis, A. (2008). Reading strategies in hypertexts and factors influencing hyperlink selection. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 191-213.
58. Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33, 451-481.
59. Reader, W. R., & Payne, S. J. (2007). Allocating time across multiple texts: Sampling and satisficing. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 263-298.
60. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503-529). San Diego: Academic.
61. Rouet, J. F. (1992). Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: When does nonlinearity help? In D. Lucarella, J. Nanard, M. Nanard, & P. Paolini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Hypertext (pp. 131-140). New York: ACM.
62. Salmerón, L., Baccino, T., Cañas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2008). Processing of graphical overviews: Evidence from eye movements. Manuscript submitted for publication.
63. Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.
64. Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. J. (2006). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning with hypertext. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1157-1171.
65. Schmidt, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405-429.
66. Schnotz, W. (1982). How do different readers learn with different text organizations? In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 87-97). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
67. Schvaneveldt, R. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
68. Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners' memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77-93.
69. Scott, B. M., & Schwartz, N. H. (2007). Navigational spatial displays: The role of metacognition as cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 17, 89-105.
70. Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 605-620). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1638). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
72. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191-210.
73. Stiller, K. D. (2007). Computerised multimedia learning. Modes of text presentation and access to text. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
74. Taylor, K. L., & Dionne, J. P. (2000). Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 413-425.
75. Taylor, R. S. (2004). Informal science learning: Influences of explanatory elaboration and learner control on knowledge acquisition. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
76. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
77. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
78. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
79. Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 331-358.
80. Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2002). Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: Comparing different approaches. Instructional Science, 30, 243-267.