Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 191-210

  Stadtler, Marc ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comprehension of multiple documents; Expert layperson communication; Internet research; Metacognition; Metacognitive tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748873884     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
2. Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen [Effects of metacognitive learning aids in networked learning environments]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 13-25.
3. Bannert, M. (2004). Designing metacognitive support for hypermedia learning. In H. Niegemann, D. Leutner & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional Design for Multimedia-Learning. (pp. 19-30). Münster: Waxmann.
4. Bhavnani, S. K., Jacob, R. T., Nardine, J., & Peck, F. A. (2003). Exploring the distribution of online healthcare information. Paper presented at the CHI, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (April).
5. Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F., & Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. [Need for cognition: A scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147-154.
6. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. v. d. Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving student's ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485-522.
8. Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson-communication. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers-and how they may be overcome. New York: Springer.
9. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399-413.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Chuan, F. K. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
11. Czienskowski, U. (1996). Wissenschaftliche Experimente: Planung, Auswertung, Interpretation. [Scientific experiments: planning, analysis and interpretation]. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
12. Dillon, A. (1991). Readers' models of text structures: The case of academic articles. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 913-925.
13. Dillon, A. (2002). Writing as design: Hypermedia and the shape of information space. In: R. Bromme & E. Stahl (Eds.), Writing hypertext and learning: Conceptual and empirical approaches. New York: Pergamon.
14. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
15. Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative studies using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324, 573-577.
16. Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Eun-Ryoung, S. (2002). Emprical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web. A systematic review. JAMA, 287, 2691-2700.
17. Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. III (pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics, 4th edition. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.
19. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43-55.
20. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. USA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
23. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837-858.
24. O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical decision making, 15, 15-30.
25. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Rogosa, D. (1988). Myths about longitudinal research. In: K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. M. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 171-209). New York: Springer.
27. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493.
29. Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
30. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371.
31. Stadtler, M. (2006). Auf der Suche nach medizinischen Fachinformationen. Metakognitionen bei der Internetrecherche von Laien [Searching for medical information. The role of metacognition in the Internet research of laypersons]. Münster: Waxmann.
32. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2004). Laypersons searching for medical information on the web: The role of metacognition. In: K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1638). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behaviour (in press).
34. Veenmann, M. V., Elshout, J. J., & Busato, V. V. (1994). Metacognitive Mediation in learning with computerbased simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 93-106.
35. Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2000). Attachment from infancy to early adulthood in a high-risk sample: Continuity, discontinuity, and their correlates. Child Development, 71, 695-702.
36. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 79.
37. Wittwer, J., Bromme, R., & Jucks, R. (2004). Kann man dem Internet trauen, wenn es um die Gesundheit geht? Die Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung medizinischer Fachinformationen im Internet durch laien. [Is the Internet a trustworthy source when it comes to health information? Laypersons' trustworthiness ratings of medical information on the Internet] Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 2, 48-56.