The foundations of a theory-aware authoring tool for CSCL design

Computers and Education

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 809-834

  Isotani, Seiji ^a   Mizoguchi, Riichiro ^a   Inaba, Akiko ^a   Ikeda, Mitsuru ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN ADVANCED INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning design; CSCL; Intelligent authoring system; Ontology

Indexed keywords

AUTHORING SYSTEMS; AUTHORING TOOL; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EFFECTIVE LEARNING; GROUP ACTIVITIES; GROUP LEARNING; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; LEARNING OUTCOME; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING THEORY; ONTOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; SYSTEMATIC DESIGNS;

CESIUM ALLOYS; COMPLEXATION; DESIGN; INTEROPERABILITY; TEACHING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77249174752     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson J.R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review 89 4 (1982) 369-406
2. Alfonseca E., Carro R.M., Martín E., Ortigosa A., and Paredes P. The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: A case study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16 3-4 (2006) 377-401
3. Bandura A. Social learning theory (1977), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Barkley E., Cross K.P., and Major C.H. Collaborative learning techniques: A practical guide to promoting learning in groups (2005), Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CL
5. Babic, F., Wagner, J., & Paralic, J. (2008). The role of ontologies in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the international symposium on applied machine intelligence and informatics (pp. 119-124).
6. Collins A. Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In: Jones L., and Jones B.F. (Eds). Educational values and cognitive instruction (1991), LEA
7. CTGV - Cognition and technology group at Vanderbilt. Anchored instruction in science education. In: Duschl R., and Hamilton R. (Eds). Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (1992), SUNY Press, Albany, NY 244-273
8. Devedzic V. Semantic web and education (2006), Springer
9. Dimitrakopoulou, A., Petrou, A., Martinez, A., Marcos, J. A., Kollias, V., Jermann, P., Harrer, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Bollen L. (2006). State of the art of interaction analysis for metacognitive support & diagnosis. Kaleidoscope Research Report .
10. Dillenbourg P. What do you mean by collaborative learning, collaborative learning and computational approaches (1999), Elsevier Science, Oxford pp. 1-19
11. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (2002), Open University Nederland, Heerlen 61-91
12. Endlsey, W. R. (1980). Peer tutorial instruction. Educational Technology.
13. Ertmer P.A., and Newby T.J. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly 6 4 (1993) 50-70
14. Frysch S. Patterns in CSCL systems. M.Sc. in Computer Science (2006), University of Hagen, Germany
15. Fiechtner S.B., and Davis E.A. Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review 9 4 (1985) 75-88
16. Gagne R., Briggs L., and Wager W. Principles of instructional design. 4th ed. (1992), HBJ College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX
17. Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., & Mizoguchi, R. (2006). Ontological support for a theory-eclectic approach to instructional and learning design. In Proceedings of the European conference on technology enhanced learning, lecture notes in computer science 4227 (pp. 155-169).
18. Hernandez-Leo D., Asensio-Perez J.I., and Dimitriadis Y. Computational representation of collaborative learning flow patterns using IMS learning design. Educational Technology and Society 8 4 (2005) 75-89
19. Hernandez-Leo D., Villasclaras-Fernandez E.D., Jorrin-Abellan I.M., Asensio-Perez J.I., Dimitriadis Y., Ruiz-Requies I., et al. Collage, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society 9 1 (2006) 58-71
20. Hoppe, U., Pinkwart, N., Oelinger, M., Zeini, S., Verdejo, F., Barros, B., et al. (2005). Building bridges within learning communities through ontologies and "thematic objects". In Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 211-220).
21. Kobbe L., Weinberger A., Dillenbourg P., Harrer A., Hämäläinen R., and Fischer F. Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 2-3 (2007) 211-224
22. Kumar, V. S., Gress, C. L. Z, Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (in press). Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach. Computers in Human Behavior. .
23. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (1991), Cambridge University Press
24. Ikeda, M., Go, S., & Mizoguchi, R. (1997). Opportunistic group formation. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 167-174).
25. Inaba, A., Ohkubo, R., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2002). An interaction analysis support system for CSCL: An ontological approach to support instructional design process. In Proceedings of the international conference on computers in education (pp. 358-362).
26. Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2003) What learning patterns are effective for a learner's growth? In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 219-226).
27. Inaba, A., Ohkubo, R., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2003b). Models and vocabulary to represent learner-to-learner interaction process in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the international conference on computers in education (pp. 1088-1096).
28. Inaba, A., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004) Learner's role and predictable educational benefits in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent tutoring systems, LNCS 3220 (pp. 285-294).
29. Isotani S., and Mizoguchi R. An integrated framework for fine-grained analysis and design of group learning activities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 151 (2006), IOS Press 193-200
30. Isotani S., and Mizoguchi R. Deployment of ontologies for an effective design of collaborative learning scenarios. Proceedings of the international workshop on groupware 4715 (2007), LNCS 223-238
31. Isotani S., and Mizoguchi R. Adventures in the boundary between domain-independent ontologies and domain content for CSCL. Proceedings of the international conference on knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems 5179 (2008), LNAI 523-532
32. Isotani S., and Brandao L.O. An algorithm for automatic checking of exercises in a dynamic geometry system: iGeom. Computers and Education 51 3 (2008) 1283-1303
33. Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. International Journal on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. .
34. Laurillard D. The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4 1 (2009) 5-20
35. Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H. U., & Harrer, A. (2005). CSCL scripts: Modelling features and potential use. In Proceedings of the international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 423-432).
36. Miyake N., and Shirouzu H. A collaborative approach to teaching cognitive science to undergraduates: The learning sciences as a means to study and enhance college student learning. Psychologia 49 2 (2006) 101-113
37. Mizoguchi, R., Hayashi, Y., & Bourdeau, J. (2007). Inside theory-aware and standards-compliant authoring system. In Proceedings of the international workshop on ontologies and semantic web for e-learning (pp. 1-18).
38. Moura, J. G., Brandão, L. O., & Brandão, A. A. F. (2007). A web-based learning management system with automatic assessment resources. In Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in education conference, Session F2D (pp. 1-6).
39. Psyche, V., Bourdeau, J., Nkambou, R., & Mizoguchi, R. (2005). Making learning design standards works with an ontology of educational theories. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 539-546).
40. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: modes of learning, semantic factors in cognition. LEA (pp. 37-53).
41. Rummel N., and Spada H. Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 2 (2005) 201-241
42. Ruthven K., Hennessya S., and Deaneya R. Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education 51 1 (2008) 297-317
43. Salomon G. Distributed cognitions (1993), Cambridge University Press
44. Spiro R.J., Coulson R.L., Feltovich P.J., and Anderson D.K. Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. The tenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 375-383
45. Stahl G., Koschmann T., and Suthers D. CSCL: An historical perspective. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK pp. 409-426
46. Stahl G. Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
47. Soller A., Martínez-Monés A., Jermann P., and Muehlenbrock M. From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15 4 (2005) 261-290
48. Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2007). A framework for eclectic analysis of collaborative interaction. In Proceedings of the international conference on computers supported collaborative learning (pp. 694-703).
49. Suthers D.D., Vatrapu R., Medina R., Joseph S., and Dwyer N. Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers and Education 50 4 (2008) 1103-1127
50. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., and Jochems W.M.G. Designing group based learning: Six steps to designing computer-supported group based learning. Computers and Education 42 (2004) 403-424
51. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., Jochems W.M.G., and Broers N.J. The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research 35 (2004) 195-229
52. Stegmann K., Weinberger A., and Fischer F. Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2 4 (2007) 421-447
53. Tchounikine P. Operationalizing macro-scripts in CSCL technological settings. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3 2 (2008) 421-447
54. Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Isotani, S., Hayashi, Y., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). Looking into collaborative learning: Design from macro- and micro-script perspectives. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 231-238).
55. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes (1930/1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
56. Weinberger A., Ertl B., Fischer F., and Mandl H. Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science 33 1 (2005) 1-30
57. Webb N.M., Nemer K.M., and Ing M. Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 1 (2006) 63-119