The implications of RTI and EBP for SLPs: Commentary on L. M. Justice

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 298-303

  Ukrainetz, Teresa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Language assessment; Language intervention; Reading disability

Indexed keywords

CHILD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; LANGUAGE THERAPY; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH THERAPY; SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750854125     PISSN: 01611461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/034)     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents. Rockville, MD: Author.
2. Berninger, V. W., Vermeulen, K., Abbott, R. D., McCutchen, D., Cotton, S., et al. (2003). Comparison of three approaches to supplementary reading instruction for low-achieving second-grade readers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 101-116.
3. Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2005). Language and reading disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Ehren, B. J., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). The responsiveness to intervention approach and language impairment. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 120-131.
5. Ehren, T. C., & Whitmire, K. A. (2005). Leadership opportunities in the context of responsiveness to intervention activities. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 168-179.
6. Gelzheiser, L. M., & Meyers, J. (1991). Reading instruction by classroom, remedial and resource room teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 512-526.
7. Gillam, R., Loeb, D., Bohman, T., Champlin, C., Thibodeau, L., Widen, J., et al. (2005, November). Comparing language intervention outcomes. Mini-seminar presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention. San Diego, CA.
8. Gillam, R. B., Loeb, D. F., & Friel-Patti, S. (2001). Looking back: A summary of five exploratory studies of Fast ForWord. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 269-273.
9. Gillam, R. B., & van Kleeck, A. (1996). Phonological awareness training and short-term working memory: Clinical implications. Topics in Language Disorders, 17(1), 72-81.
10. Graner, P. S., Faggella-Luby, M. N., & Fritschmann, N. S. (2005). An overview of responsiveness to intervention: What practitioners ought to know. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 93-105.
11. Justice, L. M. (2006). Evidence-based practice, response-to-intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 284-297.
12. Justice, L. M., Skibbe, L., & Ezell, H. (2006). Using print referencing to promote written language awareness. In T. A. Ukrainetz (Ed.), Contextualized language intervention: Scaffolding PreK-12 literacy achievement (pp. 329-428). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
13. Kratcoski, A. M. (1998). Guidelines for using portfolios in assessment and evaluation. Language. Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 3-10.
14. Lidz, C. S., & Pepa, E. D. (1996). Dynamic assessment: The model, its relevance as a nonbiased approach, and its application to Latino American preschool children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27(4), 367-372.
15. Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, P. (1998). The Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program for Reading, Spelling, and Speech (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002).
17. O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 43-54.
18. Pepa, E. D., Gillam, R. B., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C., & Sabel, T. (in press). Dynamic assessment of school-age children's narrative ability: An investigation of reliability and validity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
19. Pepa, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A nonbiased procedure. The Journal of Special Education. 26, 269-280.
20. Pinnell, G. S., Fried, M. D., & Estice, R. M. (1990). Reading Recovery: Learning how to make a difference. The Reading Teacher, 43, 282-295.
21. Shumway, K. (1999). The effectiveness of dynamic assessment as a kindergarten screening measure. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wyoming: Laramie.
22. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
23. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
24. Staskowski, M., & Rivera, E. A. (2005). Speech-language pathologists' involvement in responsiveness to intervention activities: A complement to curriculum-relevant practice. Topics in Language Disorders. 25, 132-147.
25. Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., & O'Brien, M. (2003). The stability of primary language disorder: Four years after kindergarten diagnosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1283-1296.
26. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
27. Troia, G. A. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention: Roles for speech-language pathologists in the prevention and identification of learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 106-119.
28. Ukrainetz, T. A. (2005). What to work on how: An examination of the practice of school-age language intervention. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 32, 108-119.
29. Ukrainetz, T. A. (2006). Assessment and intervention within a contextualized skill framework. In T. A. Ukrainetz (Ed.), Contextualized language intervention: Scaffolding PreK-12 literacy achievement (pp. 7-58). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
30. Ukrainetz, T. A., & Fresquez, E. F. (2003). What isn't language?: A qualitative study of the role of the school speech-language pathologist. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 284-298.
31. Ukrainetz, T. A., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 142-153.
32. Ukrainetz, T. A., & Trujillo, A. (1999). "You know, I just don't know what else you'd do?" Five SLPs' perspectives on children's literature in speech-language intervention. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 26, 35-48.
33. University of Alabama. (2004). Project CORE: Building a community to reading excellence in Jefferson County Mississippi. Tuscaloosa, AL: Department of Education Early Reading First Grant.
34. Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
35. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.