Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just academic knowledge

Journal of Educational Administration

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 609-629

  Bowers, Alex J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Data collection; Decision making; Educational tests; Schools; United States of America

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350376639     PISSN: 09578234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09578230910981080     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. ACT (2007), ACT, Inc.: Educational/Career Planning and Workforce Development, ACT, St Louis, MO.
2. Alexander, K.L., Entwisle, D.R. and Kabbani, N.S. (2001), "The dropout process in life course perspective: early risk factors at home and school", The Teachers College Record, Vol. 103 No. 5, pp. 760-822.
3. Allensworth, E.M. and Easton, J.Q. (2005), "The on-track indicator as a predictor of high school graduation", paper presented at the Consortiumon Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, available at: www.consortium-chicago.org/publications/p78.html
4. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L. and Maciver, D.J. (2007), "Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: identification and effective interventions", Educational Psychologist, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 223-35.
5. Bernhardt, V. (2004), Data Analysis for Continuous School Improvement, Eye on Education, Larchmont, NY.
6. Borg, I. and Gorenen, P. (1997), Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, NY.
7. Bowers, A.J. (2007), "Grades and data driven decision making: issues of variance and student patterns", unpublished PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
8. Bowers, A.J. (2008), "Promoting excellence: good to great, NYC's district 2, and the case of a high performing school district", Leadership and Policy in Schools, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 154-77.
9. Brennan, R.T., Kim, J., Wenz-Gross, M. and Siperstein, G.N. (2001), "The relative equitability of high-stakes testing versus teacher-assigned grades: an analysis of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS)", Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 173-215.
10. Brookhart, S.M. (1991), "Grading practices and validity", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 35-6.
11. Brookhart, S.M. (2004), "Classroom assessment: tensions and intersections in theory and practice", Teachers College Record, Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 429-58.
12. Brunner, C., Fasca, C., Heinze, J., Honey, M., Light, D., Mandinach, E. and Wexler, D. (2005), "Linking data and learning: the grow network study", Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 241-67.
13. Busick, K. (2000), "Grading and standards-based assessment", in Trumbull, E. and Farr, B. (Eds), Grading and Reporting Student Progress in an Age of Standards, Christopher-Gordon, Norwood, MA, pp. 71-86.
14. Carr, J. (2000), "Technical issues of grading methods", in Trumbull, E. and Farr, B. (Eds), Grading and Reporting Student Progress in an Age of Standards, Christopher-Gordon, Norwood, MA, pp. 45-70.
15. Cizek, G.J. (2000), "Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 16-33.
16. Cizek, G.J., Fitzgerald, S.M. and Rachor, R.E. (1995/1996), "Teachers' assessment practices: preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink", Educational Assessment, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 159-79.
17. Coburn, C.E. and Talbert, J.E. (2006), "Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: mapping the terrain", American Journal of Education, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 469-95.
18. Creighton, T.B. (2001), "Data analysis and the principalship", Principal Leadership, Vol. 1 No. 9, pp. 52-7.
19. Cross, L.H. and Frary, R.B. (1999), "Hodgepodge grading: endorsed by students and teachers alike", Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 53-72.
20. Davidson, M.L. (1983), Multidimensional Scaling, Wiley, New York, NY.
21. Dynarksi, M. (2004), "Interpreting the evidence from recent federal evaluations of dropout-prevention programs: the state of scientific research", in Orfield, G. (Ed.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the Graduation Rate Crisis, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 255-68.
22. Dynarski, M. and Gleason, P. (2002), "How can we help? What we have learned from recent federal dropout prevention evaluations", Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 43-69.
23. Earle, L. and Fullan, M. (2003), "Using data in leadership for learning", Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 383-94.
24. Evans, F.B. (1976), "What research says about grading", in Simon, S.B. and Bellanca, J.A. (Eds), Degrading the Grading Myths: A Primer of Alternatives to Grades and Marks, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Washington, DC, pp. 30-50.
25. Farr, B.P. (2000), "Grading practices: an overview of the issues", in Trumbull, E. and Farr, B. (Eds), Grading and Reporting Student Progress in an Age of Standards, Christopher-Gordon, Norwood, MA, pp. 1-22.
26. Flanagan, K.S., Bierman, K.L. and Kam, C.-M. (2003), "Identifying at-risk children at school entry: the usefulness of multibehavioral problem profiles", Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 396-407.
27. Frary, R.B., Cross, L.H. and Weber, L.J. (1993), "Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: implications for instruction in measurement", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 23-30.
28. Glass, G.V. (1967), "Factors in teachers' perceptions of students", Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 87-93.
29. Gleason, P. and Dynarski, M. (2002), "Do we know whom to serve? Issues in using risk factors to identify dropouts", Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 25-41.
30. Guskey, T.R. (2007), "Multiple sources of evidence: an analysis of stakeholder perceptions of various indicators of student learning", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 19-27.
31. Hallinan, M.T. (1992), "The organization of students for instruction in middle school", Sociology of Education, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 114-27.
32. Halverson, R.R., Prichett, R., Grigg, J. and Thomas, C. (2005), "The new instructional leadership: creating data-driven instructional systems in schools", WCER Working Paper No. 2005-9, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, available at: www.wcer.wisc.edu/Publications/workingPapers/ Working_Paper_No_2005_9.pdf
33. Hammond, C., Linton, D., Smink, J. and Drew, S. (2007), Dropout Risk Factors and Exemplary Programs: A Technical Report, National Dropout Prevention Center, Clemson, SC, available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/29/91/0b.pdf
34. Hamre, B.K. and Pianta, R.C. (2001), "Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eight grade", Child Development, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 625-38.
35. Hamre, B.K. and Pianta, R.C. (2005), "Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure", Child Development, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 949-67.
36. Hargis, C.H. (1990), Grades and Grading Practices: Obstacles to Improving Education and Helping At-Risk Students, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
37. Kerr, K.A., Marsh, J.A., Schuyler-Ikemoto, G., Darilek, H. and Barney, H. (2006), "Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts", American Journal of Education, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 496-520.
38. Kirschenbaum, H., Napier, R. and Simon, S.B. (1971), Wad-Ja-Get? The Grading Game in American Education, Hart Publishing, New York, NY.
39. Kuncel, N.R., Crede, M. and Thomas, L.L. (2005), "The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 63-83.
40. Lekholm, A.K. and Cliffordson, C. (2008), "Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school level: effects of gender and family background", Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 181-99.
41. Linn, R.L. (1982), "Ability testing: individual differences, prediction, and differential prediction", in Wigdor, A.K. and Garner, W.R. (Eds), Ability Testing: Uses, Consequences, and Controversies, National Academy, Washington, DC, pp. 335-88.
42. McMillan, J.H. (2001), "Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 20-32.
43. McMillan, J.H. (2003), "Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision making: implications for theory and practice", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 34-43.
44. Mead, A. (1992), "Review of the development of multidimensional scaling methods", Statistician, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 27-39.
45. NCES (n.d.), NCES Common Core of Data, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
46. Parsons, T. (1959), "The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society", Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 297-318.
47. Pincus, H.S. and Schmelkin, L.P. (2003), "Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty: a multidimensional scaling analysis", The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 196-209.
48. Rau, W. and Durand, A. (2000), "The academic ethic and college grades: does hard work help students to 'Make the grade'?", Sociology of Education, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 19-38.
49. Raudenbush, S.W. (2005), "Learning from attempts to improve schooling: the contribution of methodological diversity", Educational Researcher, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 25-31.
50. Rencher, A.C. (2002), Methods in Multivariate Analysis, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
51. Salpeter, J. (2004), "Data: mining with a mission", Technology & Learning, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 30-32, 34, 36.
52. Shepard, L.A. (2006), "Classroom assessment", in Brennan, R.L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement, 4th ed., Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 623-46.
53. Shepard, L.A., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J.B., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, C. and Pacheco, A. (2005), "Assessment", in Darling-Hammond, L. and
54. Bransford, J. (Eds), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 275-326.
55. Smith, J.K. (2003), "Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading", Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 26-33.
56. Song, M. and Miskel, C.G. (2007), "Exploring the structural properties of the state reading policy domain using network visualization technique", Educational Policy, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 589-614.
57. SPSS (2006), SPSS Inc. 15.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL.
58. Streifer, P.A. (2004), Tools and Techniques for Effective Data-Driven Decision Making, Scarecrow Education, Lanham, MD.
59. Streifer, P.A. (2005), "Using data mining to identify actionable information: breaking new ground in data-driven decision making", Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 281-93.
60. Subkoviak, M.J. (1975), "The use of multidimensional scaling in educational research", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 387-423.
61. Thorn, C.A. (2002), "Data use in the school and classroom: the challenges of implementing data-based decision making inside schools", WCER Working Paper No. 2002-2, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, available at: www.wcer.wisc.edu/Publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2002_2.pdf
62. Thorn, C.A. and Meyer, R.H. (2006), "Longitudinal data systems to support data-informed decision making: a tri-state partnership between Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin", WCER Working Paper No. 2006-1, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, available at: www.wcer.wisc.edu/Publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2006_1.pdf
63. Trumbull, E. (2000a), "Avoiding bias in grading systems", in Trumbull, E. and Farr, B. (Eds), Grading and Reporting Student Progress in an Age of Standards, Christopher-Gordon, Norwood, MA, pp. 105-28.
64. Trumbull, E. (2000b), "Why do we grade - and should we?", in Trumbull, E. and Farr, B. (Eds), Grading and Reporting Student Progress in an Age of Standards, Christopher-Gordon, Norwood, MA, pp. 23-44.
65. Wayman, J.C. (2005), "Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection", Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 295-308.
66. Wayman, J.C. and Stringfield, S. (2006a), "Data use for school improvement: school practices and research perspectives", American Journal of Education, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 463-8.
67. Wayman, J.C. and Stringfield, S. (2006b), "Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement", American Journal of Education, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 549-71.
68. Wayman, J.C., Cho, V. and Johnston, M.T. (2007), The Data-Informed District: A District-Wide Evaluation of Data Use in the Natrona County School District, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, available at: http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/Wayman_data_use_evaluation.pdf
69. Wayman, J.C., Stringfield, S. and Yakimowski, M. (2004), "Software enabling school improvement through the analysis of student data", Report No. 67, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1c/2d/4d.pdf
70. Wilson, M. (2004), Towards Coherence Between Classroom Assessment and Accountability: 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
71. Wood, L.A. (1994), "An unintended impact of one grading practice", Urban Education, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 188-201.
72. Woodruff, D.J. and Ziomek, R.L. (2004), "High school grade inflation from 1991 to 2003", Research Report Series 2004-04, ACT, Iowa City, IA, available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/a5/0e.pdf
73. Young, V.M. (2006), "Teachers' use of data: loose coupling, agenda setting and team norms", American Journal of Education, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 521-48.