Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context

System

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 434-446

  Zeng, Gang ^a   Takatsuka, Shigenobu ^b  

^a HYOGO UNIVERSITY OF TEACHER EDUCATION   (Japan)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collaborative dialogue; Computer mediated communication; English as a foreign language; Language related episode

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650999513     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aljaafreh A., and Lantolf J.P. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78 (1994) 465-483
2. Appel C., and Mullen T. Pedagogical considerations for a web-based tandem language learning environment. Computers and Education 34 (2000) 291-308
3. Blake R. Computer mediated communication: a window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology 4 (2000) 120-136
4. Cole J. Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System (2005), O' Reilly Community Press, Sebastopol
5. Darhower M. Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: a sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal 19 (2002) 249-277
6. Donato R. Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: Lantolf J.P., and Appel G. (Eds). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (1994), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 33-56
7. Donato R. Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24 (2004) 284-302
8. Ewald J.D. Language-related episodes in an assessment context: a 'small-group quiz'. Canadian Modern Language Review 61 (2005) 565-586
9. Foster P., and Ohta A.S. Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics 26 (2005) 402-430
10. Gánem Gutiérrez G.A. Beyond interaction: the study of collaborative activity in computer-mediated tasks. ReCALL 15 (2003) 94-112
11. Gánem Gutiérrez G.A. Sociocultural theory and its application to CALL: a study of the computer and its relevance as a meditational tool in the process of collaborative activity. ReCALL 18 (2006) 230-251
12. Kern R. Reconstructing classroom interaction with networked computers: effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal 79 (1995) 457-476
13. Kern R. Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40 (2006) 183-210
14. Kern R., and Warschauer M. Introduction: theory and practice of networked language teaching. In: Warschauer M., and Kern R. (Eds). Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1-19
15. Kern R., Ware P., and Warschauer M. Crossing frontiers: new directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24 (2004) 243-260
16. Kitade K. The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning and Technology 12 (2008) 64-84
17. Krashen S.D. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications (1985), Longman, New York
18. Kumuravadivelu B. Understanding Language Teaching (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, Mahwah, NJ
19. Lantolf J.P. Introducing sociocultural theory. In: Lantolf J. (Ed). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1-26
20. Lapkin S., Swain M., and Smith M. Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal 86 (2002) 485-507
21. Lee L. Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology 8 (2004) 83-100
22. Leeser M.J. Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8 (2004) 55-81
23. Long M.H. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie W.C., and Bhatia T.K. (Eds). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (1996), Academic Press, San Diego 413-468
24. Mayer R.E. Learners as information processors: legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist 31 (1996) 151-161
25. Morris F. Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class. Language Learning and Technology 9 (2005) 29-45
26. Naughton D. Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal 90 (2006) 169-184
27. Ohta A.S. Rethinking interaction in SLA: developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In: Lantolf J. (Ed). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford 51-78
28. O'Rourke B. Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal 22 (2005) 433-466
29. Schwienhorst K. Learner autonomy and tandem learning: putting principles into practice in synchronous and asynchronous telecommunications environments. Computer-Assisted Language Learning 16 (2003) 427-443
30. Schwienhorst K. Native-speaker/non native-speaker discourse in the MOO: participation and engagement in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer-Assisted Language Learning 17 (2004) 35-50
31. Shekary M., and Tahririan M.H. Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. Modern Language Journal 90 (2006) 557-573
32. Smith B. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: an expanded model. Modern Language Journal 87 (2003) 38-58
33. Smith B. The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly 39 (2005) 33-58
34. Storch N. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52 (2002) 119-158
35. Storch N. Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research 37 (2003) 305-322
36. Swain M. Communicative competence. some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development in its development. In: Gass S., and Madden C. (Eds). Input in Second Language Acquisition (1985), Newbury House, Rowley, MA 235-253
37. Swain M. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In: Doughty C., and Williams J. (Eds). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 64-82
38. Swain M. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In: Lantolf J. (Ed). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford 97-114
39. Swain M. Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review 58 (2001) 44-63
40. Swain M. Examining dialogue: another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing 18 (2001) 275-302
41. Swain M., and Lapkin S. Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal 82 (1998) 320-337
42. Swain M., and Lapkin S. Talking it through: two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37 (2002) 285-304
43. Swain M., Brooks L., and Tocalli-Beller A. Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22 (2002) 171-185
44. Tanaka N. Collaborative interaction as the process of task completion in task-based CALL classrooms. JALT CALL Journal 1 (2005) 21-40
45. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Warschauer M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. Modern Language Journal 81 (1997) 470-481
47. Watanabe Y., and Swain M. Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research 11 (2007) 121-142
48. Williams J. Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49 (1999) 583-625