Beyond interaction: The study of collaborative activity in computer-mediated tasks

ReCALL

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 94-112

  Gutiérrez, Gabrielaadelagánem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248695030     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344003000818     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001) The effects of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Language Learning and Technology 5(1): 202-232.
2. Anderson, A., Mayes, J. T. and Kibby, M. R. (1995) Small group collaborative discovery learning from hypertext. In: O'Malley, C. (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 23-38.
3. Chapelle, C. (1997) CALL in the year 2000: still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning and Technology 1(1): 19-43. http://polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vol1num1/chapelle/default.html
4. Chapelle, C. (1998) Multimedia CALL: lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology 2 (1): 22-34. http://polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vol2num1/article/index.html
5. Chapelle, C. (2001) Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and Research: Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
6. Chun, D. M. and Plass, J. L. (1996) Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System 24(4): 503-519.
7. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2001) Research Methods in Education (5th Ed). London: Routledge/Falmer.
8. Coughlan, P. and Duff, P. A. (1994) Same Task, Different Activities: Analysis of SLA Task from an Activity Theory Perspective. In: Lantolf, P. and Appel, G. (eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
9. Crook, C. (1994) Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge.
10. De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1994) In: Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.),
11. Donato, R. (1994) Collective Scaffolding in Second Language Learning. In: Lantolf, P. and Appel, G. (eds.), op cit.
12. Egbert, J. L. and Jessup, L. M. (1996) Analytic and Systemic Analyses of Computer-Supported Language Learning Environments, TESL-EJ 2(2) http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej06/a1.html
13. Ellis, R. (2001) Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., and Swain, M. (eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Harlow: Longman, 49-74.
14. Frawley, W. (1992) Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2003) The Processes of Collaborative Activity in Computer-Mediated Tasks: In Search for Microgenesis. University of Southampton, PhD Dissertation in progress.
16. Hegelheimer, V. and Chapelle, C. (2000) Methodological Issues in Research on Learner-Computer interaction in CALL. Language Learning and Technology 4(1): 41-49.
17. Hubbard, P. (1992) A Methodological Framework for CALL Courseware Development. In: Pennington, M. C. and Stevens, V. (eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: an international perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Kowal, M. and Swain, M. (1997) From semantic to syntactic processing. How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In: Johnson, R. K. and Swain, M. (eds.) Immersion Education: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284-309.
19. Krashen, S. D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Lantolf, J. P. (2000) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Krashen, S. D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
22. Long, M. H. (1985) Input and second language acquisition theory. In: Gass, S. and Madden, C. G. (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 377-393.
23. Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1993) Units of Analysis in Syllabus Design - The Case for Task. In Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
24. McCafferty, S. G. (1994) The Use of Private Speech by Adult ESL Learners at Different Levels of Proficiency. In: Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G.
25. Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. (1998) Second Language Learning Theories. London: Arnold.
26. Mohan, B. (1992) Models of the Role of the Computer in Second Language Development. In Pennington, M. C. and Stevens, V. (eds.),
27. Ohta, A. S. (2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51-78.
28. Pica, T. (1994) Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44(3): 493-527.
29. Plass J. L. (1998) Design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software: a cognitive approach. Language Learning and Technology 2(1): 35-45. http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article2/index.html
30. Robbins, D. (2001) Vygotsky's Psychology-Philosophy: A Metaphor for Language Theory and Learning. New York: Kluwer Academic.
31. Roebuck, R. (2000) Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), 79-95.
32. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S. D. (1995) The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. In O'Malley, C. (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 69-97.
33. Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Skehan, P. (2001) Tasks and language performance assessment. In: Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (eds.), 167-185.
35. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (2001) Cognition and Tasks. In: Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
37. Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. (eds.) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245-256.
38. Swain, M. (1997) Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34:115-132.
39. Swain, M. (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In: Doughty, C. and Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-81.
40. Swain, M. (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.),
41. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In: Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (eds.) Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. London: Longman, 99-118.
42. Thorne, S. L. (2000) Second language acquisition theory and the truth(s) about relativity. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), 219-243.
43. Ur, P. (1981) Discussions that work: Task-centred fluency practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Warschauer, M. (1996) Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In: Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center (University of Hawaiʼni Press), 29-46. http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW01/