Child-to-child interaction and corrective feedback in a computer mediated L2 class

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-45

  Morris, Frank ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744293481     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the Passé Composé and the Imparfait. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 226-243.
2. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer assisted classroom discussion in foreign language classrooms: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455-464.
3. Beck, M. L., & Eubank, L. (1991). Acquisition theory and experimental design: A critique of Tomasello and Herron. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 73-76.
4. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
5. Braidi, S. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52(1), 1-42.
6. Breen, M (2001). Overt participation and covert acquisition in the language classroom. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 112-140). London: Longman.
7. Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. Modern Language Journal, 55(3), 380-397.
8. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29-46.
9. Chaudron, C. (1986). Teachers's priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 64-84). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
10. Chaudron, C. (1987). The role of error correction in second language teaching. In B. K. Das (Ed.), Patterns in classroom interaction in Southeast Asia (pp. 17-50). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
11. Chun, D. M. (1998). Using computer-assisted class discussion to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 57-80). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
12. Chun, A. E., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native-nonnative conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 537-547.
13. Darhower, M. (2002). Instructional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(3), 249-277.
14. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of the critical period effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
15. Doughty, C. (1994). Fine tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table (GURT) 1993 (pp. 96-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Lowen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in Communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281-318.
18. Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10(4), 583-593.
19. Fernândez-Garcia, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker-non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 279-294.
20. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Grimshaw, J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Positive and negative evidence in language acquisition. Behavioral and Brain Science, 12(2), 341-342.
22. Hamayan, E., & Tucker, E. (1980). Language input in the bilingual classroom and its relationship to second language achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 453-468.
23. Haas, C., & Neuwirth, C. M. (1994). Writing the technology that write us. In S. Hilligoss & C. Self (Eds.), Literacy and computers (pp. 319-335). New York: Modern Languages Association.
24. Hall, J. (2000). Classroom interaction and additional language learning: Implications for teaching and research. In J. Hall & L. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 287-298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Han, Z-H. (2002). A study of impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 543-572.
26. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newburry House.
27. Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441-454.
28. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with network computers. Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
29. Kim, Y. (1998). The effect of a network computer-mediated discussion on subsequent oral discussion in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
30. Krashen, S (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In M. Burt, H. Dulay, & M. Finocchiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 152-161). New York: Regents.
31. Krashen, S. (1994). The Input Hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
32. Leeman, J. (2000). Towards a new classification of input: An empirical study of the effect of recasts, negative evidence and enhanced salience on L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
33. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37-63.
34. Lightbown, P., & White, L. (1987). The influence of linguistics theories on language acquisition research. Language Learning, 37(4), 483-510.
35. Lin, Y. H., & Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low proficiency Chinese speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46(4), 567-611.
36. Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177-193.
37. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In D. C. K. de Bot, C. Kramsch, & R. Ginsburg (Eds.), Foreign language research in a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
39. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
41. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts explicit correction in relation to error types and learning repairs in L2 classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-213.
42. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recast, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in second language acquisition, 20, 51-81.
43. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
44. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35-66.
45. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversation interaction and second language development: Recasts, response and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.
46. Moroishi, M. (2001). Recasts and learner uptake in Japanese classroom discourse. In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present and future of second language research. Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 197-208). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
47. Morris, F. (2002a). Learner-learner interaction in the Spanish foreign language classroom: The effects of recasts and negotiation on L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
48. Morris, F. (2002b). Negotiation and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair. Foreign Language Annals, 35(4), 395-404.
49. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction with a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50(4), 617-673.
50. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11(1), 43-62.
51. Nystrom, N. (1983). Teacher-student interaction in bilingual classrooms: four approaches to error feedback. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 169-188). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
52. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 77(4), 459-481.
54. Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 372-386.
55. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50(1), 119-151.
56. Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97-111.
57. Oskoz, A., & Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2001). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and teacher's beliefs: A pilot study. In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present and future of second language research Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 209-228). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
58. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and classroom uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595.
59. Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Davis.
60. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodum, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
61. Pinker, S. (1989). Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. In M. L. Rice, & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), The teachability of language (pp. 13-62). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.
62. Salaberry, R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39-56.
63. Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-161.
64. Saxton, M., Kulcsar, B., Marshall, G., & Rupra, M. (1998). Long term effects of corrective input and experimental approach. Journal of Child Language, 25, 701-721.
65. Singleton, D. (1995). Introduction: A critical look at the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengeyl (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 1-29). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
66. Smith, B. (2001). Taking students to task: Task-based computer mediated communication and negotiated interaction in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
67. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 57(1), 38-57.
68. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
69. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70. Tarone, E., & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation and SLA theory. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: A festschrift for H. G. Widdowson (pp. 107-124). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
71. Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437-456.
72. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 287-301.
73. Walther, J., Anderson, J., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 460-487.
74. Warschauer, M (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-25.
75. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 95-110.
76. White, L. (1990). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 121-133.