Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 305-322

  Storch, Neomy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classroom based research; Pair work; Patterns of interaction; Second language learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844475156     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00007-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1996). Cooperative learning. Critical thinkiny and collaboration across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
2. Ahmed, M. K. (1994). Speaking as cognitive regulation. A Vygotskian perspective on dialogicc communication. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 157-171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. Allwriglit, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156-171.
4. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Bennett, N., & Cass, A. (1988). The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 19-32.
6. Bygate, M. (1988). Units of oral expression and language learning in small group interaction. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 59-82.
7. Chang, G., & Wells, G. (1988). The literate potential of collaborative talk. In T. MacLure, T. Phillips, & A. Wilkson (Eds.), Oracy matters (pp. 95-109). Stony Stratford, England: Open University Press.
8. Crook, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 102-117). London: Routledge.
9. de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(iv), 484-496.
10. DiCamilla, F. J., & Anton, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.
11. Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
12. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Duff, P. A. (2000). Repetition in foreign language classroom interaction. In J. K. Hall, & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 109-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Bloom.
15. Ellis, R. (1991). The interaction hypothesis: A critical evaluation. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (pp. 179-211). Singapore: Regional English Centre.
16. Ellis, S., & Gauvain, M. (1992). Social and cultural influences on children's collaborative interactions. In L. T. Winegar, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children's development within social context, Vol. 2. (pp. 155-180). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
18. Forrester, M. A. (1992). The development of young children's social-cognitive skills. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiations of meaning. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn; Conversations in SLA (pp. 327-351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73-93.
23. Lantolf, J. (1998). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Seminar series delivered at the University of Melbourne, Australia, May 22.
24. Leki, I. (2001). "A narrow thinking system": Nonnativc-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 3S(1), 39-68.
25. Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language learning, 45(4), 605-655.
26. Long, M. H. (1983a). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
27. Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Clarke, & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82; Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching (pp. 207-228). Washington, DC: TESOL.
28. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchic, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
29. Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-227.
30. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Negotiations of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
31. Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135-141.
32. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff, & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 172-193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching Journal, 47(3), 203-210.
34. Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93-121.
35. Pica, T. (1987). Intcrlanguagc adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38(1), 45-73.
36. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
37. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 63-90.
38. Putney, L. A., Green, J., Dixon, C., Duran, R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions. Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In O. D. Lee, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vyaotskianperspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 86-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 192-196.
40. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
41. Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.
42. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54.
44. Storch, N. (2001). An investigation into the nature of pair work in an ESL classroom and its effect on grammatical development. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
45. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.
46. Swain, M. (1995). Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Plenary paper presented at the Annual American Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Long Beach, CA.
47. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
48. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.
49. Takahashi, T. (1989). The influence of the listener on L2 speech. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preson, & L. Sclinker (Eds.), Variations in second language acquisition. Discourse and pragmatics, Vol. 1, (pp. 245-279). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
50. Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetic of talk. Language, 63, 574-605.
51. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetitions, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1985a). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 71-90.
53. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. M. (1985b). Miscommunication in native/nonnative conversation. Language in Society, 14(3), 327-343.
54. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.