Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it

Human Communication Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 538-563

  Lee, Kwan Min ^a   Park, Namkee ^a   Song, Hayeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26644453740     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/31.4.538     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Arkin, R. C., Fujita, M., Takagi, T., & Hasegawa, R. (2003). An ethological and emotional basis for human-robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 191-201.
2. Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1-15.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved September 20, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html
6. Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, C., & Stoner, M. (2001). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Paper presented at Presence 2001. Retrieved September 15,2003, from http://astro.temple.edu/~lombard/P2001/Bioccal.pdf
7. Bloom, P., & Veres, C. (1999). The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition, 71, B1-B9.
8. Breazeal, C. (1998). A motivational system for regulating human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 54-61). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
9. Breazeal, C. (2002). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Breazeal, C. (2003a). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 119-155.
11. Breazeal, C. (2003b). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.
12. Brooks, R. (2002). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. New York: Pantheon Books.
13. Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I., & Simmons, R. (2001). The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Emotional and Intelligent II: The Tangled Knot of Society of Cognition (pp. 17-21). North Falmouth, MA: AAAI Press.
14. Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Fox, D., Hahnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., & Schulz, D. (1999). Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot. Artificial Intelligence, 114, 3-55.
15. Cañamero, L. (Ed.). (2001). Emotional and intelligent II: The tangled knot of social cognition (Tech. Rep. No. FS-01-02). North Falmouth, MA: AAAI Press.
16. Clark, H. H. (1999). How do real people communicate with virtual partners? Proceedings of 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium, Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 43-47). North Falmouth, MA: AAAI Press.
17. Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61, 1584-1595.
18. Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots. Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 192-197). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
19. Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In S. Payr & R. Trappl (Eds.), Agent culture: Human-agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 45-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Dautenhahn, K., & Billard, A. (1999). Bringing up robots, or the psychology of socially intelligent robots: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 366-367). Seattle, WA: ICAA.
21. Dautenhahn, K., Ogden, B., & Quick, T. (2002). From embodied to socially embedded agents: Implications for interaction-aware robots. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3). 397-428.
22. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
23. Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177-190.
24. Fernald, A. (1992). Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 391-428). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143-166.
26. Fujita, M. (2001). AIBO: Toward the era of digital creatures. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(10), 781-794.
27. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
28. Hyde, K. R., Kurdek, L., & Larson, P. (1983). Relationship between pet ownership and self-esteem, social sensitivity, and interpersonal trust. Psychological Reports, 42(1), 110.
29. Isbister, K., & Nass, C. (2000). Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(2), 251-267.
30. Khan, Z. (1998). Attitudes towards intelligent service robots (Tech. Rep. No. TRITA-NA-P9821, NADA, KTH). Stockholm, Sweden.
31. Kiesler, S., & Goetz, J. (2002). Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants. Proceedings of CHI '02 on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 576-577). Minneapolis, MN: CHI.
32. Klein, L. R. (1999). Creating virtual experiences in the new media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
33. Kozima, H., & Yano, H. (2001). Arobot that learns to communicate with human caregivers. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, 85, 47-52. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
34. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50.
35. Lee, K. M., Jin, S. A., Park, N., & Kang, S. (2005, May). Effects of narrative on feelings of presence in computer/video games. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), New York, NY.
36. Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2004). The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: Doubly disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Human Communication Research, 30, 182-207.
37. Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7, 31-45.
38. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 3(2), Retrieved September 15, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/
39. McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
40. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 669-678.
41. Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2001). Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 171-181.
42. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103.
43. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(2), 223-239.
44. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender Stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864-876.
45. Nourbakhsh, I. R., Bobenage, J., Grange, S., Lutz, R., Meyer, R., & Soto, A. (1999). An affective mobile robot educator with a full-time job. Artificial Intelligence, 114, 95-124.
46. st IEEE Conference on Humanoid Robots. Cambridge, MA.
47. Persson, P., Laaksolathi, J., & Lönnqvist, P. (2001). Understanding socially intelligent agents: A multi-layered phenomenon. Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans on Socially Intelligent Agents - The Human in the Loop, 31(5), 349-360.
48. Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. (1987). Companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60, 743-746.
50. Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. (1988). Children's pets and adults' self-concept. Journal of Psychology, 122(5), 463-469.
51. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
52. Russell, D. W., & Cutrona, C. E. (1988). Development and evolution of the UCLA loneliness scales. Unpublished manuscript. Center for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
53. Russell, D. W., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminative validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
54. Scheeff, M., Pinto, J., Rahardja, K., Snibbe, S., & Tow, R. (2002). Experiences with Sparky, a social robot. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Caftamero, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationship with computers and robots (pp. 173-180). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55. Searle, J. R. (1981). Minds, brains, and programs. In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Bantam Books.
56. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
57. Ziemke, T. (2001, July). Disentangling notions of embodiment. Paper presented at the Workshop on Developmental Embodied Cognition, Edinburgh, UK.